Background: Increased maximum resting anal pressures (MRAP) have been found in patients with large prolapsed hemorrhoids undergoing hemorrhoidectomy, but their pathogenic role is controversial especially in view of the sphincteric damage that occurs with open and stapled procedures. This prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted to compare anal pressure changes in early symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease before and after successful treatment with band ligation or injection sclerotherapy, and to compare these pressures with those in normal asymptomatic controls. Methods: 32 patients with symptomatic grade II hemorrhoids were randomized to treatment with either band ligation or injection sclerotherapy. Anal manometry was done before treatment and 8 weeks after completion of treatment, and compared with 20 normal age-matched controls. Results: The pretreatment values in both study groups were similar to each other (69.38 cm H2O, 95% CI 58.67–80.08, vs. 67.75 cm H2O, 95% CI 56.86–78.64; p = 0.790), but were significantly higher (p = 0.0001 in both groups) than in the controls (45.25 cm H2O, 95% CI 38.36–52.14). After successful completion of treatment, there was a highly significant drop in the MRAP in both study groups (p = 0.0001 in group A, and p = 0.001 in group B) reaching normal values. Conclusions: Our study shows that even in early-stage hemorrhoids, the anal pressures are significantly raised, but after successful treatment with band ligation or injection sclerotherapy, these pressures return to normal, showing that they do not play a pathogenic role but are secondary to the congested hemorrhoidal cushions.

Keywords:
Hemorrhoids, Manometry, anal, Band ligation, Sclerotherapy, injection
1.
Williams NS: Hemorrhoidal diseases; in Keighley MRB, Williams NS (eds): Surgery of the Anus, Rectum and Colon. London, Saunders, 1993, vol 1, pp 295–363.
2.
Thompson WH: The nature of hemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1975;62:542–552.
3.
Gibbons CP, Trowbridge EA, Bannister JJ, Read NW: The role of the anal cushions in maintaining continence. Lancet 1986;1:886–888.
4.
Sun WM, Read NW, Shorthouse AJ: Hypertensive anal cushions as a cause of the high anal canal pressures in patients with hemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1990;77:458–462.
5.
Ho YH, Tan M: Ambulatory anorectal manometric findings in patients before and after hemorrhoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 1997;12:296–297.
6.
El-Gendi MA, Abdel-Baky N: Anorectal pressure in patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:388–391.
7.
Khalil KH, O’Bichere A, Sellu D: Randomized clinical trial of sutured versus stapled closed haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2000;87:1352–1355.
8.
Roe AM, Bartolo DC, Vellacott KD, Locke-Edmunds J, Mortensen NJ: Submucosal versus ligation excision haemorrhoidectomy: a comparison of anal sensation, anal sphincter manometry and postoperative pain and function. Br J Surg 1987;74:948–951.
9.
Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tsang C, Eu KW: Randomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:1449–1455.
10.
van Tets WF, Kuijpers JH, Tran K, Mollen R, van Goor H: Influence of Park’s anal retractor on anal sphincter pressures. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:1042–1045.
11.
Hancock BD, Smith K: The internal sphincter and Lord’s procedure for hemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1975;62:833–836.
12.
Arabi Y, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MR: Anal pressures in hemorrhoids and anal fissures. Am J Surg 1977;134:608–610.
13.
Read MG, Read NW, Haynes WG, Donnelly TC, Johnson AG: A prospective study of the effect of hemorrhoidectomy on sphincter function and fecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1982;69:396–398.
14.
Shafik A: The pathogenesis of hemorrhoids and their treatment by anorectal bandotomy. J Clin Gastroenterol 1984;6:129–137.
15.
Hancock BD: Internal sphincter and the nature of hemorrhoids. Gut 1977;18:651–655.
16.
Teramoto T, Parks AG, Swash M: Hypertrophy of the external anal sphincter in hemorrhoids: a histometric study. Gut 1981;22:45–48.
17.
Vellacott KD, Hardcastle JD: Is continued anal dilatation necessary after a Lords procedure for hemorrhoids? Br J Surg 1980;67:658–659.
18.
Deutsch AA, Moshkovitz M, Nudelman I, Dinari G, Reiss R: Anal pressure measurements in the study of hemorrhoid etiology and their relation to treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:855–857.
19.
Chen WS, Leu SY, Wang FM: The roles of hemorrhoidectomy and lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids – clinical and manometric study. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) 1989;43:255–260.
20.
Felt-Bersma RJ, van Baren R, Koorevaar M, Strijers RL, Cuesta MA: Unsuspected sphincter defects shown by anal endosonography after anorectal surgery. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:249–253.
21.
Hiltunen KM, Matikainen M: Anal manometric findings in symptomatic hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:807–809.
22.
Sun WM, Peck RJ, Shorthouse AJ, Read NW: Hemorrhoids are associated not with hypertrophy of the internal anal sphincter, but with hypertension of the anal cushions. Br J Surg 1992;79:592–594.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
2007
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.