Background/Aims: A temporary loop ileostomy is constructed to protect a distal colonic anastomosis. Closure is usually performed not earlier than 8–12 weeks after the primary operation. During this period, stoma-related complications can occur and enhance the adverse effect on quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the length of time between ileostomy construction and closure, to quantify stoma-related morbidity and to examine the potential advantages of early ileostomy closure. Methods: Sixty-nine patients with a temporary, protective loop ileostomy (constructed between January 1996 and December 2000) were retrospectively analysed. The analysis was done by reviewing the medical records and the notes of the stoma care nurse. Results: Sixty ileostomies (87%) were closed after a median period of 24 weeks (range 2–124 weeks). Stoma-related complications occurred in 29 of the 69 patients (42%), and 11 patients (18%) had complications after ileostomy closure. Conclusion: The length of time between ileostomy construction and closure was substantially longer than initially planned. Earlier ileostomy closure (preferably even during the initial admission) could reduce the frequently occurring stoma-related morbidity in these patients and thus improve quality of life.

Keywords:
Temporary loop ileostomies, Morbidity, Ileostomy closure
1.
Rolandelli RH, Roslyn JJ: Colon and rectum; in Townsend CM (ed): Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders, 2001, pp 929–973.
2.
Amin SN, Memon MA, Armitage NC, Scholefield JH: Defunctioning loop ileostomy and stapled side-to-side closure has low morbidity. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2001;83:246–249.
3.
Chen F, Stuart M: The morbidity of defunctioning stomata. Aust NZ J Surg 1996;66:218–221.
4.
Sakai Y, Nelson H, Larson D, Maidl L, Young-Fadok T, Ilstrup D: Temporary transverse colostomy vs. loop ileostomy in diversion: A case-matched study. Arch Surg 2001;136:338–342.
5.
Kairaluoma M, Rissanen H, Kultti V, Mecklin JP, Kellokumpu I: Outcome of temporary stomas. A prospective study of temporary intestinal stomas constructed between 1989 and 1996. Dig Surg 2002;19:45–51.
6.
Williams NS, Nasmyth DG, Jones D, Smith AH: De-functioning stomas: A prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy. Br J Surg 1986;73:566–570.
7.
Rullier E, Le Toux N, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Parneix M, Saric J: Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 2001;25:274–277.
8.
Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R, Heald RJ, Moran BJ: Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 2001;88:360–363.
9.
Shellito PC: Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1562–1572.
10.
Pakkastie TE, Ovaska JT, Pekkala ES, Luukkonen PE, Jarvinen HJ: A randomised study of colostomies in low colorectal anastomoses. Eur J Surg 1997;163:929–933.
11.
Poon RT, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW, Law WL, Wong J: Prospective evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma for low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. World J Surg 1999;23:463–467.
12.
Golub R, Golub RW, Cantu R Jr, Stein HD: A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomoses. J Am Coll Surg 1997;184:364–372.
13.
Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P, Heald RJ: Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1994;81:1224–1226.
14.
Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Hittinger R, Blesovsky L: Covering stoma for elective anterior resection of the rectum: An outmoded operation? Am J Surg 1984;147:524–530.
15.
Keighley MR, Williams NS: Ileostomy; in Keighley MR, Williams NS (eds): Surgery of the Anus, Rectum and Colon. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders, 1993, pp 139–199.
16.
Senapati A, Nicholls RJ, Ritchie JK, Tibbs CJ, Hawley PR: Temporary loop ileostomy for restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1993;80:628–630.
17.
Winslet MC, Barsoum G, Pringle W, Fox K, Keighley MR: Loop ileostomy after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis – is it necessary? Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:267–270.
18.
Phang PT, Hain JM, Perez-Ramirez JJ, Madoff RD, Gemlo BT: Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown. Am J Surg 1999;177:463–466.
19.
O’Leary DP, Fide CJ, Foy C, Lucarotti ME: Quality of life after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and temporary loop ileostomy for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 2001;88:1216–1220.
20.
O’Toole GC, Hyland JM, Grant DC, Barry MK: Defunctioning loop ileostomy: A prospective audit. J Am Coll Surg 1999;188:6–9.
21.
Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, Lagaay MB, Gooszen HG: Quality of life with a temporary stoma: Ileostomy vs. colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:650–655.
22.
Hallbook O, Matthiessen P, Leinskold T, Nystrom PO, Sjodahl R: Safety of the temporary loop ileostomy. Colorectal Dis 2002;4:361–364.
23.
Saghir JH, McKenzie FD, Leckie DM, McCourtney JS, Finlay IG, McKee RF, Anderson JH: Factors that predict complications after construction of a stoma: A retrospective study. Eur J Surg 2001;167:531–534.
24.
Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, Lagaay MB, Gooszen HG: Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: Randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. Br J Surg 1998;85:76–79.
25.
Park JJ, Del Pino A, Orsay CP, Nelson RL, Cintron JR, Abcarian H: Stoma complications: The Cook County Hospital experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:1575–1580.
26.
Bakx R, Busch OR, van Geldere D, Bemelman WA, Slors JF, van Lanschot JJ: Feasibility of early closure of loop ileostomies: A pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:1680–1684.
© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
2004
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.