Background: Wound complications occur quite often after abdominal operations. Numerous studies have been performed in the last decades focusing on closure methods, incisions and suture materials. However, the most important factor, the individual surgeon, has hardly been taken into account in these studies. Methods: This study presents results from a prospective randomised study on abdominal wall closure focusing on the results of the individual surgeon. Results/Conclusions: We found no differences in the complication rate between different suture materials or between continuous and interrupted closure techniques. There are marked individual differences in complication rates between surgeons. Regular audit with feedback to individual surgeons is an important instrument for quality improvement.

Keywords:
Abdominal wall closure, Dehiscence, Wound infection, Incisional hernia
1.
Bucknall TE, Cox PJ, Ellis H: Burst abdomen and incisional hernia: A prospective study of 1,129 major laparotomies. Br Med J 1982;27:931–933.
2.
Riou JPA, Cohen JR, Johnson H: Factors influencing wound dehiscence. Am J Surg 1992;163:324–330.
3.
Bucknall TE, Ellis H: Abdominal wound closure: A comparison of monofilament nylon and polyglycolic acid. Surgery 1981;89:672–677.
4.
Gislason H, Grønbech JE, Søreide O: Burst abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations: Comparison of three closure techniques. Eur J Surg 1995;161:349–354.
5.
Leaper DJ, Pollock AV, Evans M: Abdominal wound closure: A trial of nylon, polyglycolic acid and steel sutures. Br J Surg 1977;64:603–606.
6.
Wissing J, van Vroonhoven TJ, Schattenkerk ME, Veen HF, Ponsen RJG, Jeekel J: Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: Results of a randomized trial. Br J Surg 1987;74:738–741.
7.
Osther PJ, Gjøde P, Mortensen BB, Bartholin J, Gottrup F: Randomized comparison of polyglycolic acid and polyglyconate sutures for abdominal fascial closure after laparotomy in patients with suspected impaired wound healing. Br J Surg 1995;82:1080–1082.
8.
Sahlin S, Ahlberg J, Granström L, Ljungström KG: Monofilament versus multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal closure. Br J Surg 1993;80:322–324.
9.
Israelsson LA, Jonsson T: Closure of midline laparotomy incisions with polydioxanone and nylon: The importance of suture technique. Br J Surg 1994;81:1606–1608.
10.
Kendall SWH, Brennan TG, Guillou PJ: Suture length to wound length ratio and the integrity of midline and lateral paramedian incisions. Br J Surg 1991;78:705–707.
11.
Krukowski ZH, Cusick EL, Engeset J, Matheson NA: Polydioxanone or polypropylene for closure of midline abdominal incisions: A prospective comparative clinical trial. Br J Surg 1987;74:828–830.
12.
Cameron AEP, Parker CJ, Field ES, Gray RCF, Wyatt P: A randomised comparison of polydioxanone (PDS) and polypropylene (Prolene) for abdominal wound closure. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1987;69:113–115.
13.
Corman ML, Veidenheimer MC, Coller JA: Controlled clinical trial of three suture materials for abdominal wall closure after bowel operations. Am J Surg 1981;141:510–513.
14.
Schoetz DJ, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC: Closure of abdominal wounds with polydioxanone. Arch Surg 1988;123:72–74.
15.
Wadström J, Gerdin B: Closure of the abdominal wall: How and why? Acta Chir Scand 1990;156:75–82.
16.
Medina M, Sillero M, Martinez-Gallego G, Delgado-Rodriguez M: Risk factors of surgical wound infection in patients undergoing herniorrhaphy. Eur J Surg 1997;163:191–198.
17.
Jenkins TPN: The burst abdominal wound: A mechanical approach. Br J Surg 1976;63:873–876.
18.
Israelsson LA, Jonsson T: Suture length to wound length ratio and healing of midline laparotomy incisions. Br J Surg 1993;80:1284–1286.
© 1999 S. Karger AG, Basel
2000
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.