Background: Requisite to the application of clinical databases for observational research in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is the identification of an accurate case cohort. There is limited information on the validity of using diagnosis codes to identify HS and cutaneous abscess (CA) case cohorts. Objectives: The objective of the study was to assess the validity in utilizing diagnosis codes to establish the HS and CA cohorts from an integrated health system clinical database. Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated a case-finding algorithm for HS which included the presence of at least one diagnosis code for HS and no diagnosis codes for CA of the axilla, groin, perineum, or buttock at any time. We evaluated a case-finding algorithm for CA which included the presence of at least one diagnosis code for abscess in the axilla, groin, perineum, or buttock and no codes for HS at any time. Medical records for a random sample of 100 patients meeting algorithm criteria were reviewed and adjudicated by dermatologists for accuracy of diagnosis. The positive predictive values (PPVs) of the ICD code-based case definitions were calculated, using the dermatologist’s chart-based adjudication as the reference standard. Results: Among 100 HS patients, median age (interquartile range) in the HS cohort was 33 (24.75, 43.25) years. HS patients were predominantly female (82%) and white (70%). Median age among 100 CA patients was 31.5 (95% CI 6.75, 47.25) years. The majority of CA patients were female (56%) and white (69%). The PPVs of the ICD-based case-finding algorithms for HS and CA were 88% (95% CI 81.6–94.4%) and 75.0% (95% CI 66.5–83.5%), respectively. Conclusion: The case-finding algorithms employing at least one diagnosis code for HS and CA of the axilla, groin, perineum, or buttock, with the exclusion of the other’s diagnosis codes, has good to strong PPV and may provide balance in achieving accuracy and adequate power for cohorts identified within clinical databases.

Keywords:
Hidradenitis suppurativa, Abscess, Validation, Diagnosis, Codes
1.
Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US); 2021. [updated 2021 Mar 10; cited 2022 Sep 7]. Available from: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/index.html.
2.
Strunk A, Midura M, Papagermanos V, Alloo A, Garg A. Validation of a case-finding algorithm for hidradenitis suppurativa using administrative coding from a clinical database. Dermatology. 2017;233(1):53–7.
3.
Kim GE, Shlyankevich J, Kimball AB. The validity of the diagnostic code for hidradenitis suppurativa in an electronic database. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171(2):338–42.
4.
Zouboulis CC, Del Marmol V, Mrowietz U, Prens EP, Tzellos T, Jemec GBE. Hidradenitis suppurative/acne inversa: criteria for diagnosis, severity assessment, classification and disease evaluation. Dermatology. 2015;231(2):184–90.
5.
Celsus AC. De medicina. Self-published. A.D. 25.
6.
DeFrances CJ, Lucas CA, Buie VC, Golosinskiy A. 2006 National hospital discharge survey. Natl Health Stat Report. 2008;5:1–20.
7.
Hall MJ, DeFrances CJ, Williams SN, Golosinskiy A, Schwartzman A. National hospital discharge survey: 2007 summary. Natl Health Stat Report. 2010;(29):1–12.
8.
Shlyankevich J, Chen AJ, Kim GE, Kimball AB. Hidradenitis suppurativa is a systemic disease with substantial comorbidity burden: a chart-verified case-control analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(6):1144–50.
© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2022
You do not currently have access to this content.