Background: Little information is available about the complexity and function of skin cells contributing to the high stability of tattoos. It has been shown that dermal macrophages play an important role in the storage and maintenance of pigment particles. By contrast, the impact of dermal fibroblasts, forming the connective tissue of the skin, on the stability of the tattoo is not known. Method: In this study, we compared the cell number and the particle load in dermal macrophages versus dermal fibroblasts, isolated from tail skin of tattooed mice. Results: Microscopic analysis revealed that both cell populations contained the tattoo particles, although in largely different amounts. A small number of macrophages with high side scatter intensity contained a large quantity of pigment particles, whereas a high number of dermal fibroblasts harbored only a few pigment particles. Using the CD64dtr mouse model that allows for selective, diphtheria toxin-mediated depletion of macrophages, we have previously shown that macrophages hold the tattoo in place by capture-release and recapture cycles. In the tattooed skin of macrophage-depleted mice, the content of pigment particles in fibroblasts did not change; however, the total number of fibroblasts carrying particles increased. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that dermal macrophages and fibroblasts contribute in different ways to the tattoo stability and further improves our knowledge on tattoo persistence.

Keywords:
Tattoo, Macrophage, Fibroblast, Tattoo maintenance
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel
2020
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.