Background: Real-time tissue elastography is a new, noninvasive method in ultrasonography, differentiating tissues according to their stiffness. Earlier studies have highlighted this technique as a useful diagnostic tool for the detection of noncutaneous malignancies like breast, prostate and thyroid cancer based on the principle that tumor cells present a higher stiffness compared to the adjacent normal tissue. Objective: The purpose of our study was to investigate the value of real-time tissue elastography for the differentiation of benign and metastatic peripheral lymph nodes (LN) in patients with cutaneous melanoma by comparing this technique with conventional B-mode sonography combined with power Doppler sonography (PDS). Methods: In this prospective study, 36 melanoma patients (23 females and 13 males, mean age 62.7 ± 11.1 years) undergoing LN excision at the Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University of Bonn, were included between July 2011 and July 2012. Real-time tissue elastography was planned prior to surgery and histopathological examination. Elasticity images had been qualitatively scored for the proportion of stiff areas from pattern 1-5 (soft to stiff) on the basis of a newly defined system for LNs. Results: A total of 42 LNs have been removed in 36 patients. Of these 42 LNs, 21 carried melanoma cells and 21 were benign LNs. Significant differences in elastographic patterns were found between metastatic and nonmetastatic LNs. In real-time tissue elastography, 19 (90.5%) of 21 metastatic LNs showed a pattern of 3, 4 or 5. Of all benign LNs, 76.2% had a pattern of 1 or 2 in their elastogram. Sensitivity and specificity of B-mode sonography combined with PDS were 80.9 and 76.2%, respectively, 90.5 and 76.2% for elastography and 95.2 and 76.2% for the combined evaluation. Conclusion: An elastography pattern ≥3 was identified as an independent significant factor, predicting a metastatic LN involvement. The combination of elastography with conventional B-mode sonography has the potential to further improve the differentiation between benign and metastatic peripheral LNs in melanoma patients.

Keywords:
Real-time tissue elastography, High-resolution ultrasound, Peripheral lymph node, Melanoma
1.
Rossi CR, Mocellin S, Scagnet B, et al: The role of preoperative ultrasound scan in detecting lymph node metastasis before sentinel node biopsy in melanoma patients. J Surg Oncol 2003;83:80-84.
2.
Starrit EC, Uren RF, Scolyer RA, et al: Ultrasound examination of sentinel nodes in the initial assessment of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2005;12:18-23.
3.
Hocevar M, Bracko M, Pogacnik A, et al: The role of preoperative ultrasound scan in reducing the number of sentinel lymph node procedures in melanoma. Melanoma Res 2004;14:533-536.
4.
Sanki A, Uren RF, Moncrieff M, et al: Targeted high-resolution ultrasound is not an effective substitute for lymph node biopsy in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:5614-5619.
5.
Schmid-Wendtner MH, Paerschke G, Baumert J, et al: Value of ultrasonography compared with physical examination for the detection of locoregional metastases in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Melanoma Res 2003;13:183-188.
6.
Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al: Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors among 2,313 patients with stage III melanoma: comparison of nodal micrometastases versus macrometastases. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:2452-2459.
7.
Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, et al: Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 1991;13:111-134.
8.
Ginat DT, Destounis SV, Barr RG, et al: US elastography of breast and prostate lesions. Radiographics 2009;29:2007-2016.
9.
Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al: Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006;239:341-350.
10.
Garra BS: Imaging and estimation of tissue elasticity by ultrasound. Ultrasound Q 2007;23:255-268.
11.
Giurgiu CR, Manea C, Crisan N, et al: Real-time sonoelastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Med Ultrason 2011;13:5-9.
12.
Moon HJ, Sung JM, Kim EK, et al: Diagnostic performance of gray-scale US and elastography in solid thyroid nodules. Radiology 2012;262:1002-1013.
13.
Krouskop TA, Younes PS, Srinivasan S, et al: Differences in the compressive stress-strain response of infiltrating ductal carcinomas with and without lobular features: implications for mammography and elastography. Ultrason Imaging 2003;25:162-170.
14.
Westerland O, Howlett D: Sonoelastography techniques in the evaluation and diagnosis of parotid neoplasms. Eur Radiol 2012;22:966-969.
15.
Ueno E, Tohno E, Soeda S, et al: Dynamic tests in real-time breast elastography. Ultrasound Med Biol 1988;14:53-57.
16.
Hinz T, Wenzel J, Schmid-Wendtner MH: Real-time tissue elastography: a helpful tool in the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011;65:424-426.
17.
Aoyagi S, Izumi K, Hata H, et al: Usefulness of real-time elastography for detecting lymph-node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Exp Dermatol 2009;34:744-747.
18.
Schmid-Wendtner MH, Hinz T, Wenzel J, et al: Real-time tissue elastography for diagnosis of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2011;52:713-715.
19.
Kleinerman R, Whang TB, Bard RL, et al: Ultrasound in dermatology: principles and applications. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012;67:478-487.
20.
Vassallo P, Wernecke K, Ross N, et al: Differentiation of benign from malignant superficial lymphadenopathy: the role of high-resolution US. Radiology 1992;183:215-220.
21.
Solbiati L, Rizzatto G, Belotti E: High-resolution sonography of cervical lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: criteria for differentiation of reactive versus malignant nodes. Radiology 1988;169:113.
22.
Voit C, Van Akkooi AC, Schäfer-Hesterberg G, et al: Ultrasound morphology criteria predict metastatic disease of the sentinel nodes in patients with melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:847-852.
23.
Moehrle M, Blum A, Rassner G, et al: Lymph node metastases of cutaneous melanoma: diagnosis by B-scan and color Doppler sonography. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;41:703-709.
24.
Tschammler A, Wirkner H, Ott G, et al: Vascular patterns in reactive and malignant lymphadenopathy. Eur Radiol 1996;6:473-480.
25.
Alam F, Naito K, Horiguchi J, et al: Accuracy of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: comparison with conventional B-mode sonography. Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:604-610.
26.
Carlson GW, Murray DR, Lyles RH, et al: The amount of metastatic melanoma in a sentinel lymph node: does it have prognostic significance? Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:575-581.
27.
Spanknebel K, Coit DG, Bieligk SC, et al: Characterization of micrometastatic disease in melanoma sentinel lymph nodes by enhanced pathology: recommendations for standardizing pathologic analysis. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:305-317.
28.
Starrit EC, Uren RF, Scolyer RA, et al: Ultrasound examination of sentinel nodes in the initial assessment of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2005;12:18-23.
29.
Sanki A, Uren RF, Moncrieff M, et al: Targeted high-resolution ultrasound is not an effective substitute for lymph node biopsy in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:5614-5619.
30.
Schmid-Wendtner MH, Paerschke G, Baumert J, et al: Value of ultrasonography compared with physical examination for the detection of locoregional metastases in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Melanoma Res 2003;13:183-188.
31.
Garbe C, Büttner P, Bertz J, et al: Primary cutaneous melanoma. Identification of prognostic groups and estimation of individual prognosis for 5,093 patients. Cancer 1995;75:2484-2491.
32.
Updated, Interdisciplinary, Evidence-Based German Guidelines on Melanoma. Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology group (DeCOG), 2012.
33.
Hinz T, Wilsmann-Theis D, Buchner A, et al: High-resolution ultrasound combined with power Doppler sonography can reduce the number of sentinel lymph node biopsies in cutaneous melanoma. Dermatology 2011;222:180-188.
34.
Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R, et al: Cervical lymph node metastases: diagnosis at sonoelastography - initial experience. Radiology 2007;243:258-267.
35.
Ishibashi N, Yamagata K, Sasaki H, et al: Real-time tissue elastography for the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Ultrasound Med Biol 2012;38:389-395.
36.
Bhatia KS, Cho CC, Yuen YH, et al: Real-time qualitative ultrasound elastography of cervical lymph nodes in routine clinical practice: interobserver agreement and correlation with malignancy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010;36:1990-1997.
37.
Waki K, Murayama N, Matsumura T, et al: Investigation of strain ratio using ultrasound elastography technique. First Int Symp on Information and Computer Elements, Kitakyushu, 2007.
38.
Zhi H, Xiao XY, Yang HY, et al: Ultrasonic elastography in breast cancer diagnosis: Strain ratio vs 5-point scale. Acad Radiol 2010;17:1227-1233.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.