Background: The organization of a scientific program and the arrangement of the speakers require a considerable amount of time and effort. However, little is known about how to reinforce the participants’ satisfaction with scientific programs at a large-scale academic congress with multiple parallel sessions. Objectives: This study had three main purposes: (1) to create a reference for future congresses, (2) to determine session popularity and participation rate, and (3) to identify which characteristics of sessions can affect the perception of the audience. Methods: A total of 216 scientific sessions during the 22nd World Congress of Dermatology were evaluated using printed evaluation surveys. Results: The average scores for all sessions and speakers were relatively high. There were significant differences in the numbers of total session scores, collected surveys and speakers for each session category. The number of speakers at each session was not related to the session results. It was found that among the three different session grades (excellent, fair and poor), the proportion of speakers of each grade especially contributed to the perceived quality of the poor-grade sessions. Conclusions: This survey will help to organize scientific sessions and improve the quality of academic congresses.

Keywords:
Continuing medical education, Data analysis, Questionnaires, Scientific program evaluation, World Congresses of Dermatology
1.
Casebeer L, Engler S, Bennett N, Irvine M, Sulkes D, DesLauriers M, Zhang S: A controlled trial of the effectiveness of internet continuing medical education. BMC Med 2008;6:37.
2.
Phillips SP: Does hands-on CME in gynaecologic procedures alter clinical practice? Med Teach 2010;32:259–261.
3.
Fordis M, King JE, Ballantyne CM, Jones PH, Schneider KH, Spann SJ, Greenberg SB, Greisinger AJ: Comparison of the instructional efficacy of internet-based CME with live interactive CME workshops: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005;294:1043–1051.
4.
International League of Dermatological Societies. A brief history of ILDS. London, International League of Dermatological Societies, 2011.
5.
Drexel C, Merlo K, Basile JN, Watkins B, Whitfield B, Katz JM, Pine B, Sullivan T: Highly interactive multi-session programs impact physician behavior on hypertension management: outcomes of a new CME model. J Clin Hypertens 2011;13:97–105.
6.
Lowe MM, Bennett N, Aparicio A: The role of audience characteristics and external factors in continuing medical education and physician change: effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines. Chest 2009;135:56S–61S.
7.
Davis D, O’Brien MAT, Freemantle N, Wolf FM, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A: Impact of formal continuing medical education. JAMA 1999;282:867–874.
8.
Davis D, Evans M, Jadad A, Perrier L, Rath D, Ryan D, Sibbald G, Straus S, Rappolt S, Wowk M, Zwarenstein M: The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect. BMJ 2003;327:33–35.
9.
Mazmanian PE, Johnson RE, Zhang A, Boothby J, Yeatts EJ: Effects of a signature on rates of change: a randomized controlled trial involving continuing education and the commitment-to-change model. Acad Med 2001;76:642–646.
10.
Pereles L, Lockyer J, Hogan D, Gondocz T, Parboosingh J: Effectiveness of commitment contracts in continuing medical education. Acad Med 1996;71:394.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.