Aims: The results of patch testing in children visiting our out-patient clinic with suspected allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) were prospectively investigated and compared with those reported in the literature. A review of the literature on patch testing and ACD in children is provided. Methods: Children were patch tested using the TRUE® test, supplemented with tixocortol-17-pivalate, budesonide and 3 commonly used emollients. Supplementary patch tests were undertaken on indication. Results: Seventy-nine children (31 boys and 48 girls) were patch tested. Of the patients tested, 40 (51%) had 1 or more positive allergic patch test reactions. Twenty-two (55%) of these 40 children suffered from atopic dermatitis, 9 (23%) from hand or foot dermatitis, and 9 (23%) from other skin ailments. Nickel was the most common contact allergen, but many other common and less common allergens were noted to give positive patch tests in patients. Conclusion: Sensitization to contact allergens may begin in infancy and continue to be more common in toddlers and young children. In recalcitrant atopic dermatitis, especially at the age of 5 years and over, patch tests are indicated. Good information on preventing the development of ACD in children is useful for caregivers.

1.
Beattie PE, Green C, Lowe G, et al: Which children should we patch test? Clin Exp Dermatol 2006;32:6–11.
2.
Wilkinson DS, Fregert S, Magnusson B, Bandmann HJ, et al: Terminology of contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1970;50:287–292.
3.
de Waard-van der Spek FB, Oranje AP: Allergic contact dermatitis to chlorhexidine and para-amino compounds in a 4-year-old boy: a very rare observation. Contact Dermatitis 2008;58:239–241.
4.
Seidenari S, Giusti F, Pepe P, et al: Contact sensitization in 1,094 children undergoing patch testing over a 7-year period. Pediatr Dermatol 2005;22:1–5.
5.
Weston WL, Weston JA, Kinoshita J, et al: Prevalence of positive epicutaneous tests among infants, children and adolescents. Pediatrics 1986;78:1070–1074.
6.
Barros MA, Baptista A, Correia TM, et al: Patch testing in children: a study of 562 schoolchildren. Contact Dermatitis 1991;25:156–159.
7.
Bruckner AL, Weston WL, Morelli JG: Does sensitization to contact allergens begin in infancy? Pediatrics 2000;105:1–4.
8.
Oranje AP, Bruynzeel DP, Stenveld HJ, et al: Immediate- and delayed-type contact hypersensitivity in children older than 5 years with atopic dermatitis: a pilot study comparing different tests. Pediatr Dermatol 1994;11:209–215.
9.
Seidenari S, Manzini BM, Montelese A: Contact sensitization in infants: report of 3 cases. Contact Dermatitis 1992;27:319–320.
10.
Fisher AA: Allergic contact dermatitis in early infancy. Cutis 1994;54:300–302.
11.
Clayton TH, Wilkinson SM, Rawcliffe C, et al: Allergic contact dermatitis in children: should pattern of dermatitis determine referral? A retrospective study of 500 children tested between 1995 and 2004 in one UK centre. Br J Dermatol 2006;154:114–117.
12.
Fernandez Vozmediano JM, Armario Hita JM: Allergic contact dermatitis in children. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2005;19:42–46.
13.
Manzini BM, Ferdani G, Simonetti V, et al: Contact sensitization in children. Pediatr Dermatol 1998;15:12–17.
14.
Onder M, Adisen E: Patch test results in a Turkish paediatric population. Contact Dermatitis 2008;58:63–65.
15.
Goon AT-J, Goh C-L: Patch testing of Singapore children and adolescents: our experience over 18 years. Pediatr Dermatol 2006;23:117–120.
16.
Kohl L, Blondeel A, Song M: Allergic contact dermatitis from cosmetics. Dermatology 2002;204:334–337.
17.
Volkmann KK, India MJ, Reichl PG, et al: Adverse reactions to orthodontic appliances in nickel-allergic patients. Allergy Asthma Proc 2007;28:480–484.
18.
Kerosuo H, Kullaa A, Kerosuo E, et al: Nickel allergy in adolescents in relation to orthodontic treatment and piercing of ears. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:148–154.
19.
Kalimo K, Mattila L, Kautiainen H: Nickel allergy and orthodontic treatment. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2004;18:543–545.
20.
Keruso HM, Dahl JE: Adverse patient reactions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:789–795.
21.
Roul S, Ducombs G, Leaute-Labreze C, et al: Footwear contact dermatitis in children. Contact Dermatitis 1996;35:334–336.
22.
Teixeira M, Machado S, Teixeira A, et al: Severe contact allergy to footwear in a young child. Contact Dermatitis 2005;52:159–160.
23.
Neri I, Guareschi E, Savoia F, et al: Childhood allergic contact dermatitis from henna tattoo. Pediatr Dermatol 2002;19:503–505.
24.
Marcoux D, Couture-Trudel P-M, Riboulet-Delmas G, et al: Sensitization to para-phenylenediamine from a street side temporary tattoo. Pediatr Dermatol 2002;19:498–502.
25.
Sosted H, Kohansen JD, Andersen KE, et al: Severe allergic hair dye reactions in 8 children. Contact Dermatitis 2006;54:87–91.
26.
Raison-Peyron N, Meynadier JM, Meynadier J: Sorbic acid: an unusual cause of systemic contact dermatitis in an infant. Contact Dermatitis 2000;43:247–248.
27.
Corazza M, Mantovani L, Bacilieri S, et al: A child with ‘occupational’ allergic contact dermatitis due to MCI/MI. Contact Dermatitis 2001;1:46–47.
28.
Conti A, Motolese A, Manzini BM, et al: Contact sensitization to preservatives in children. Contact Dermatitis 1997;37:35–36.
29.
de Waard-van der Spek FB, Devillers AC, Oranje AP: Allergic contact dermatitis to sorbitan sesquioleate in Adaptic wound dressing. Contact Dermatitis 2007;57:54–56.
30.
Orton DI, Shaw S: Sorbitan sesquioleate as an allergen. Contact Dermatitis 2001;44:190–191.
31.
Paz Castenado-Tardan M, Jacob SE: Allergic contact dermatitis to sorbitan sesquioleate in children. Contact Dermatitis 2008;58:171–172.
32.
Foti C, Bonifazi E, Casulli C, et al: Contact allergy to topical corticosteroids in children with atopic dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2005;52:162–163.
33.
Mitello G, Jacob SE, Crawford GH: Allergic contact dermatitis in children. Curr Opin Pediatr 2006;18:385–390.
34.
Fisher AA: Patch testing in children including early infancy. Cutis 1994;54:387–388.
35.
Worm M, Aberer W, Agathos M, et al: Patch testing in children – recommendations of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG). J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2007;5:107–109.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.