Background: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) are well known to be sensitive to irritation from the environment due to the impaired function of the stratum corneum (SC). Electrical current perception threshold (CPT) evaluation quantifies the sensory threshold to transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the sensory nerves. Objective: To study the CPT in a noninvasive fashion using Neurometer® CPT/C, together with measurements of various functions of the SC. Methods: We measured the CPT on the flexor forearm and cheek of AD patients and normal individuals. Subsequently, we evaluated the CPT and skin sensitivity to a 30% aqueous solution of lactic acid after the infliction of various mildly disruptive measures on the SC on the flexor forearm of healthy individuals by the following three methods: (1) removal of the superficial sebum with acetone/ether, (2) scarification with a needle and (3) tape stripping of the SC. Finally, we examined the effect of topical applications of emollients such as petrolatum or a moisturizing cream to the scratched skin. Results: AD patients showed a lower barrier function and lower CPT than normal individuals. In subsequent studies conducted in normal individuals, the CPT was found to be inversely correlated with transepidermal water loss (TEWL) levels after tape stripping. However, most of all, the partial superficial scarification with a needle decreased the CPT and increased the lactic acid stinging response. Prolonged removal of lipids from the SC with acetone/ether for 30 min that increased the TEWL levels for only 1 day decreased the high-frequency conductance value for 2 days and the CPT only on the 2nd day after treatment. Topical applications of emollients were effective to prevent the increased sensitivity caused by scratching. Conclusions: AD patients showed functional abnormalities of the SC and tended to have more sensitive skin on the cheek and flexor forearm than healthy controls. Even focal SC damage caused by superficial cracking may lead to further disruption of the already damaged SC in AD patients, by eliciting scratching and facilitating the permeation of various environmental allergens and also the induction of hypersensitive skin.

1.
Berardesca E, Fideli D, Borroni G, Rabbiosi G, Maibach H: In vivo hydration and water-retention capacity of stratum corneum in clinically uninvolved skin in atopic and psoriatic patients. Acta Derm Venereol 1990;70:400–404.
2.
Werner Y, Lindberg M: Transepidermal water loss in dry and clinically normal skin in patients with atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1985;65:102–105.
3.
Watanabe M, Tagami H, Horii I, Takahashi M, Kligman AM: Functional analyses of the superficial stratum corneum in atopic xerosis. Arch Dermatol 1991;127:1689–1692.
4.
Loden M, Olsson H, Axell T, Linde YW: Friction, capacitance and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) in dry atopic and normal skin. Br J Dermatol 1992;126:137–141.
5.
Tupker RA, Pinnagoda J, Coenraads PJ, Nater JP: Susceptibility to irritants: Role of barrier function, skin dryness and history of atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1990;123:199–205.
6.
Stander S, Steinhoff M: Pathophysiology of pruritus in atopic dermatitis: An overview. Exp Dermatol 2002;11:12–24.
7.
Felix R, Shuster S: A new method for the measurement of itch and the response to treatment. Br J Dermatol 1975;93:303–312.
8.
Ebata T, Aizawa H, Kamide R: An infrared video camera system to observe nocturnal scratching in atopic dermatitis patients. J Dermatol 1996;23:153–155.
9.
Ebata T, Iwasaki S, Kamide R, Niimura M: Use of a wrist activity monitor for the measurement of nocturnal scratching in patients with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2001;144:305–309.
10.
Wahlgren CF: Measurement of itch (review). Semin Dermatol 1995;14:277–284.
11.
Cormia F: Experimental histamine pruritus. J Invest Dermatol 1952;19:21–34.
12.
Heyer G, Hornstein O, Handwerker H: Skin reactions and itch sensation induced by epicutaneous histamine application in atopic dermatitis and controls. J Invest Dermatol 1989;93:492–496.
13.
Katims JJ, Naviasky EH, Ng LK, Rendell M, Bleecker ML: New screening device for assessment of peripheral neuropathy. J Occup Med 1986;28:1219–1221.
14.
Baquis GD, Brown WF, Capell JT, Chaudhry V, Cros D, Drexinger BR, Gelblum JB, Gilchrist JM, Gitter AJ, Haig AJ, et al: Technology review: The Neurometer – Current perception threshold (CPT). Muscle Nerve 1999;22:523–531.
15.
Masson EA, Veves A, Fernando D, Boulton AJ: Current perception thresholds: A new, quick, and reproducible method for the assessment of peripheral neuropathy in diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 1989;32:724–728.
16.
Masson EA, Boulton AJ: The Neurometer: Validation and comparison with conventional tests for diabetic neuropathy. Diabet Med 1991;8:S63–S66.
17.
Pitei DL, Watkins PJ, Stevens MJ, Edmonds ME: The value of the Neurometer in assessing diabetic neuropathy by measurement of the current perception threshold. Diabet Med 1994;11:872–876.
18.
Liu S, Kopacz DJ, Carpenter RL: Quantitative assessment of differential sensory nerve block after lidocaine spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1995;82:60–63.
19.
Tay B, Wallace MS, Irving G: Quantitative assessment of differential sensory blockade after lumbar epidural lidocaine. Anesth Analg 1997;84:1071–1075.
20.
Martin J: Pruritus (review). Int J Dermatol 1985;24:634–639.
21.
Al-Jaberi H, Marks R: Studies of the clinically uninvolved skin in patients with dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1984;111:437–443.
22.
Matsumoto M, Umemoto N, Sugiura H, Uehara M: Difference in ceramide composition between ‘dry’ and ‘normal’ skin in patients with atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1999;79:246–247.
23.
Hanifin JM, Rajka G: Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockholm) Suppl 1980;92:44–47.
24.
Tagami H, Ohi M, Iwatsuki K, Kanamaru Y, Yamada M, Ichijo B: Evaluation of the skin surface hydration in vivo by electrical measurement. J Invest Dermatol 1980;75:500–507.
25.
Nilsson GE: Measurement of water exchange through skin. Med Biol Eng Comput 1977;15:209–218.
26.
Ebata T, Aizawa H, Kamide R, Niimura M: The characteristics of nocturnal scratching in adults with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1999;141:82–86.
27.
Ya-Xian Z, Suetake T, Tagami H: Number of cell layers of the stratum corneum in normal skin – Relationship to the anatomical location on the body, age, sex and physical parameters. Arch Dermatol Res 1999;291:555–559.
28.
Hara M, Kikuchi K, Watanabe M, Denda M, Koyama J, Nomura J, Horii I, Tagami H: Senile xerosis: Functional, morphological, and biochemical studies. J Geriatr Dermatol 1993;1:111–120.
29.
Takamori K: Mechanism of itch sensation in dry skin. Clin Dermatol 2000;54:52–56.
30.
Tobin D, Nabarro G, Baart de la Faille H, van Vloten WA, van der Putte SC, Schuurman HJ: Increased number of immunoreactive nerve fibers in atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1992;90:613–622.
31.
Urashima R, Mihara M: Cutaneous nerves in atopic dermatitis: A histological, immunohistochemical and electron microscopic study. Virchows Arch 1998;432:363–370.
32.
Tabata N, O’Goshi K, Zhen Y, Kligman A, Tagami H: Biophysical assessment of persistent effects of moisturizers after their daily applications: Evaluation of corneotherapy. Dermatology 2000;200:308–313.
33.
Held E, Sveinsdottir S, Agner T: Effect of long-term use of moisturizer on skin hydration, barrier function and susceptibility to irritants. Acta Derm Venereol 1999;79:49–51.
34.
Hachem JP, De Paepe K, Vanpee E, Kaufman L, Rogiers V, Roseeuw D: The effect of two moisturisers on skin barrier damage in allergic contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol 2002;12:136–138.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.