Background/Aim: Various instruments based on electrical properties of the skin are currently used to assess the stratum corneum (SC) hydration state or water holding capacity. However, no direct relation with the quantity of water measured is provided. The objective of the present study was to calibrate the Corneometer, a device displaying electrical-capacitance-related values (which reflect the skin hydration state), and the amount and behaviour of the water taken up by the outer part of the SC during a sorption-desorption test. Methods: The experiment was performed on the ventral forearms of 20 healthy volunteers after a rest in an environmentally controlled room. Corneometer and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) values were measured at intervals over the desorption process. The areas under the TEWL-versus-time curve provided the absolute amounts of residual sorbed water. Results: The decrease kinetics of both signals after subtraction of prehydration values were very similar and bi-exponential, both showing a rapid, then a slower phase. The absolute amount of water taken up by the SC (hygroscopicity) and the two desorption rates were obtained. The Corneometer values were mono-exponentially related to the amount of water remaining within the SC. This allowed the in vivo calibration of the Corneometer in terms of absolute amount of water over the desorption range. Conclusion: The method may be used to calibrate in vivo other electrical devices aimed at assessing SC hydration during a sorption-desorption test. It may also provide new ways to measure SC water uptake and water holding capacity following application of products.

Keywords:
Stratum corneum, Water content, Sorption-desorption test, Transepidermal water loss
1.
Leveque JL, De Rigal J: Impedance methods for studying skin hydration. J Soc Cosmet Chemist 1983;34:419–428.
2.
Gabard B: Testing the efficacy of moisturizers; in Elsner P, Berardesca E, Maibach H (eds): Bioengineering of the Skin: Water and Stratum corneum. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 1994, pp 147–167.
3.
Barel AO, Clarys P: In vitro calibration of the capacitance method (Corneometer CM 825) and conductance method (Skincon-200) for the evaluation of the hydration state of the skin. Skin Res Technol 1997;3:107–113.
4.
Hashimoto-Kumasaka K, Takahashi K, Tagami H: Electrical measurement of the water content of the stratum corneum in vivo and in vitro under various conditions: Comparison between skin surface hygrometer and corneometer in evaluation of the skin surface hydration state. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1993;73:335–359.
5.
Berardesca E: EEMCO guidance for the assessment of stratum corneum hydration: Electrical methods. Skin Res Technol 1997;7:126–132.
6.
Tagami H, Kanamura Y, Inoue K, Suehisa S, Inoue F, Iwatsuki K, Yashikuni K, Yamada M: Water-sorption-desorption test of the skin in vivo for functional assessment of the stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol 1982;78:425–428.
7.
Pinnagoda J, Tupker RA, Agner T, Serup J: Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. Contact Dermatitis 1990;22:164–178.
8.
Panisset F, Treffel P, Faivre B, Brunet-Lecomte P, Agache P: Transepidermal water loss related to volar forearm sites in humans. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1992;72:4–5.
9.
Nilsson GE: Measurement of water exchange through skin. Med Biol Eng Comput 1977;15:209–218.
10.
Wheldon AE, Monteith JL: Performance of a skin evaporimeter. Med Biol Eng Comput 1980;18:201–205.
11.
Petro AJ, Komor JA: Correction to absolute values of evaporation rates measured by the Servo-Med7 Evaporimeter. Bioeng Skin 1987;3:271–280.
12.
Agache P: Principales constantes biologiques de la peau; in Agache P (ed): Physiologie de la peau et explorations fonctionnelles cutanées. Cachan, Editions Médicales Internationales, 2000, pp 671–681.
13.
Agache P: Principales constantes physiques de la peau; in Agache P (ed): Physiologie de la peau et explorations fonctionnelles cutanées. Cachan, Editions Médicales Internationales, 2000, pp 663–669.
14.
Martinsen ØG, Grimnes S, Haug E: Measuring depth depends on frequency in electrical skin impedance measurements. Skin Res Technol 1999;5:179–181.
15.
Fluhr JW, Gloor M, Lazzerini S, Kleesz P, Grieshaber R, Berardesca E: Comparative study of five instruments measuring stratum corneum hydration (Corneometer CM 820 and CM 825, Skicon 200, Nova DPM 9003, DermaLab). I. In vitro. Skin Res Technol 1999;5:161–170.
16.
Courage W: Hardware and measuring probe principle: Skin conductance; in Elsner P, Berardesca E, Maibach HI (eds): Bioengineering of the Skin: Water and the Stratum corneum. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 1994, pp 197–203.
17.
Blichmann C, Serup J: Assessment of skin moisture: Measurement of electrical conductance, capacitance and transdermal water loss. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1988;68:284–290.
18.
Clarys P, Barel AO, Gabard B: Non-invasive electrical measurements for the evaluation of the hydration state of the skin: Comparison between three conventional instruments – the Corneometer®, the Skicon® and the Nova DPM®. Skin Res Technol 1999;5:14–20.
19.
Fluhr WJ, Gloor M, Lazzerini S: Comparative study of five instruments measuring stratum corneum hydration (Corneometer CM 820 and CM 825, Skicon 200, Nova DPM 9003, Dermalab). II. In vivo. Skin Res Technol 1999;5:171–178.
© 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel
2001
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.