There is general concern about the possible cutaneous adverse effects of wearing garments treated with household laundry products, particularly on atopic skin. Our objective was to compare softened and non- softened fabrics in a forearm wet and dry test, under conditions simulating real-life conditions. Twenty atopic volunteers entered a single-blind 12-day (3 sessions per day) forearm wetting and drying test. Cotton fabrics were machine washed and liquid fabric conditioner was added or not to the final rinse. To simulate conditions of skin damage, a dilute solution of sodium lauryl sulphate was applied under occlusion to the forearm of each volunteer before the start of the study. Skin effects were evaluated by visual grading (redness, dryness and smoothness), squamometry and in vivo instrumental measurements (capacitance, transepidermal water loss and colorimetry). Rubbing of atopic skin with fabrics generally resulted in discrete to moderate alterations of the structure of the stratum corneum. Both for control and pre-irritated skin, all measured parameters indicated that softened fabric was less aggressive to the skin than unsoftened fabric. In the case of pre-irritated skin, the recovery of the skin was significantly faster when rubbed with softened than with unsoftened fabrics. In conclusion, softened fabrics help mitigate the skin condition in atopic patients.

Keywords:
Atopy, Fabrics, Biometrology, Conditioner
1.
Pavlik DF: Skin tolerance of softeners. Österr Ärztez 1976;31:1224–1225.
2.
Weaver JE: Dermatologic testing of household laundry products: A novel fabric softener. Int J Dermatol 1976;15:297–300.
3.
Rodriguez C, Daskaleros PA, Sauers LJ: Effects of fabric softeners on the skin. Derm Beruf Umwelt 1994;42:58–61.
4.
Piérard GE, Arrese JE, Rodriguez C, Daskaleros PA: Effects of softened and unsoftened fabrics on sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis 1994;30:286–291.
5.
Schneider W, Tronnier H, Schneider HJ, Schmitt GJ: Untersuchung über den Zusammenhang zwischen Wäscheweichspülmitteln und Windeldermatitis bei Säuglingen. Berufsdermatosen 1974;22:209–219.
6.
Jenkins HL, Batham DM: Fabric conditioners: Do they cause nappy rash? Midwife Health Visit Community Nurse 1983;19:464–466.
7.
Bouchier Hays TAI: Do fabric conditioners cause nappy rash? Midwife Healthy Visit Community Nurse 1988;24:276–279.
8.
Piérard GE, Arrese JE, Dowlati A, Daskaleros PA, Rodriguez C: Effects of softened and unsoftened fabrics on infant skin. Int J Dermatol 1994;33:138–141.
9.
Agner T: Susceptibility of atopic dermatitis patients to irritant dermatitis caused by sodium lauryl sulphate. Acta Derm Venereol 1990;71:296–300.
10.
Tupker RA, Pinnagoda J, Coenraads PJ, Nater JP: Susceptibility to irritants: Role of barrier function, skin dryness and history of atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1990;123:199–205.
11.
Nassif A, Chan SC, Storrs FJ, Hanifin JM: Abnormal skin irritancy in atopic dermatitis and in atopy without dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1994;130:1402–1407.
12.
Hatch KL, Maibach HI: Textile chemical finish dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1986;14:1–13.
13.
Basketter DA, Griffiths HA, Wang XM, Wilhelm KP, McFadden J: Individual, ethnic and seasonal variability in irritant susceptibility of skin: The implications for a predictive human patch test. Contact Dermatitis 1996;35:208–213.
14.
Judge MR, Griffiths HA, Basketter DA, White IR, Rycroft RJG, McFadden JP: Variation in response of human skin to irritant challenge. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34:115–117.
15.
Lukacovic MF, Dunlap FE, Michaels SE, Vischer MO, Watson DD: Forearm wash test to evaluate the clinical mildness of cleansing products. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1988;39:355–366.
16.
Murahata RI, Crowe DM, Roheim JR: The use of transepidermal water loss to measure and predict the irritation response to surfactants. Int J Cosmet Sci 1986;8:225–231.
17.
Piérard GE: EEMCO guidance for the assessment of skin colour. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1998;10:1–11.
18.
Berardesca E: EEMCO guidance for the assessment of stratum corneum hydration: Electrical methods. Skin Res Technol 1997;3:126–132.
19.
Piérard GE, Piérard-Franchimont C, Saint Léger D, Kligman A: Squamometry: The assessment of xerosis by colorimetry of D-squames adhesive discs. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1992;47:297–305.
20.
Piérard GE: EEMCO guidance to the assessment of dry skin (xerosis) and ichthyosis: Evaluation by stratum corneum strippings. Skin Res Technol 1996;2:3–11.
21.
Piérard GE, Goffin V, Piérard-Franchimont C: Squamometry and corneosurfametry in rating interactions of cleansing products with stratum corneum. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1994;45:269–277.
22.
Hatch KL, Wilson DR, Maibach HI: Fabric caused changes in human skin: In vivo stratum corneum water content and water evaporation. Text Res J 1987;57:583–591.
23.
Buecking HW, Loetsch K, Taeuber G: Adsorption and desorption behavior of stearyl dimethyl ammonium chloride. Tenside 1979;17:281–287.
24.
Freeman S, Maibach HI: Study of irritant contact dermatitis produced by repeat patch test with sodium lauryl sulphate and assessed by visual methods, transepidermal water loss and laser Doppler velocimetry. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988;19:496–502.
25.
Lee HL, Maibach HI: The sodium lauryl sulfate model: An overview. Contact Dermatitis 1995;33:1–7.
© 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel
2001
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.