Background: γ (∼30-80 Hz) brain rhythms are thought to be abnormal in neurodevelopmental disorders such as schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). In adult populations, auditory 40-Hz click trains or 40-Hz amplitude-modulated tones are used to assess the integrity of superior temporal gyrus (STG) 40-Hz γ-band circuits. As STG 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) are not fully developed in children, tasks using these stimuli may not be optimal in younger patient populations. The present study examined this issue in typically developing (TD) children as well as in children with ASD, using source localization to directly assess activity in the principal generators of the 40-Hz ASSR in the left and right primary/secondary auditory cortices. Methods: 40-Hz amplitude-modulated tones of 1 s duration were binaurally presented while magnetoencephalography data were obtained from 48 TD children (45 males; 7-14 years old) and 42 ASD children (38 males; 8-14 years old). T1-weighted structural MRI was obtained. Using single dipoles anatomically constrained to each participant's left and right Heschl's Gyrus, left and right 40-Hz ASSR total power (TP) and intertrial coherence (ITC) measures were obtained. Associations between 40-Hz ASSR TP, ITC and age as well as STG gray matter cortical thickness (CT) were assessed. Group STG function and structure differences were also examined. Results: TD and ASD did not differ in 40-Hz ASSR TP or ITC. In TD and ASD, age was associated with left and right 40-Hz ASSR ITC (p < 0.01). The interaction term was not significant, indicating in both groups a ∼0.01/year increase in ITC. 40-Hz ASSR TP and ITC were greater in the right than left STG. Groups did not differ in STG CT, and no associations were observed between 40-Hz ASSR activity and STG CT. Finally, right STG transient γ (50-100 ms and 30-50 Hz) was greater in TD versus ASD (significant for TP, trend for ITC). Conclusions: The 40-Hz ASSR develops, in part, via an age-related increase in neural synchrony. Greater right than left 40-Hz ASSRs (ITC and TP) suggested earlier maturation of right versus left STG neural network(s). Given a ∼0.01/year increase in ITC, 40-Hz ASSRs were weak or absent in many of the younger participants, suggesting that 40-Hz driving stimuli are not optimal for examining STG 40-Hz auditory neural circuits in younger populations. Given the caveat that 40-Hz auditory steady-state neural networks are poorly assessed in children, the present analyses did not point to atypical development of STG 40-Hz ASSRs in higher-functioning children with ASD. Although groups did not differ in 40-Hz auditory steady-state activity, replicating previous studies, there was evidence for greater right STG transient γ activity in TD versus ASD.

1.
Gandal MJ, Edgar JC, Klook K, Siegel SJ: Gamma synchrony: towards a translational biomarker for the treatment-resistant symptoms of schizophrenia. Neuropharmacology 2012;62:1504-1518.
2.
Rojas DC, Wilson LB: γ-Band abnormalities as markers of autism spectrum disorders. Biomarkers Med 2014;8:353-368.
3.
Gandal MJ, Edgar JC, Ehrlichman RS, et al: Validating γ oscillations and delayed auditory responses as translational biomarkers of autism. Biol Psychiatry 2010;68:1100-1106.
4.
Wilson TW, Wetzel MW, White ML, Knott NL: Gamma-frequency neuronal activity is diminished in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a pharmaco-MEG study. J Psychopharmacol 2012;26:771-777.
5.
Spencer KM, Nestor PG, Perlmutter R, et al: Neural synchrony indexes disordered perception and cognition in schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:17288-17293.
6.
Spencer KM, Nestor PG, Niznikiewicz MA, et al: Abnormal neural synchrony in schizophrenia. J Neurosci 2003;23:7407-7411.
7.
Uhlhaas PJ, Phillips WA, Mitchell G, Silverstein SM: Perceptual grouping in disorganized schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 2006;145:105-117.
8.
Lee SH, Kim DW, Kim EY, Kim S, Im CH: Dysfunctional gamma-band activity during face structural processing in schizophrenia patients. Schizophr Res 2010;119:191-197.
9.
Orekhova EV, Stroganova TA, Nygren G, et al: Excess of high frequency electroencephalogram oscillations in boys with autism. Biol Psychiatry 2007;62:1022-1029.
10.
Cornew L, Roberts TP, Blaskey L, Edgar JC: Resting-state oscillatory activity in autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 2012;42:1884-1894.
11.
Grice SJ, Spratling MW, Karmiloff-Smith A, et al: Disordered visual processing and oscillatory brain activity in autism and Williams syndrome. NeuroReport 2001;12:2697-2700.
12.
Khan S, Gramfort A, Shetty NR, et al: Local and long-range functional connectivity is reduced in concert in autism spectrum disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:3107-3112.
13.
Popov T, Rockstroh B, Weisz N, Elbert T, Miller GA: Adjusting brain dynamics in schizophrenia by means of perceptual and cognitive training. PLoS One 2012;7:e39051.
14.
Heinrichs-Graham E, Franzen JD, Knott NL et al: Pharmaco-MEG evidence for attention related hyper-connectivity between auditory and prefrontal cortices in ADHD. Psychiatry Res 2014;221:240-245.
15.
Rubenstein JL, Merzenich MM: Model of autism: increased ratio of excitation/inhibition in key neural systems. Genes Brain Behav 2003;2:255-267.
16.
Tamas G, Buhl EH, Lorincz A, Somogyi P: Proximally targeted GABAergic synapses and gap junctions synchronize cortical interneurons. Nat Neurosci 2000;3:366-371.
17.
Cardin JA, Carlén M, Meletis K, et al: Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses. Nature 2009;459:663-667.
18.
Tiesinga P, Sejnowski TJ: Cortical enlightenment: are attentional gamma oscillations driven by ING or PING? Neuron 2009;63:727-732.
19.
Bartos M, Vida I, Jonas P: Synaptic mechanisms of synchronized gamma oscillations in inhibitory interneuron networks. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007;8:45-56.
20.
Wang XJ: Neurophysiological and computational principles of cortical rhythms in cognition. Physiol Rev 2010;90:1195-1268.
21.
Brenner CA, Sporns O, Lysaker PH, O'Donnell BF: EEG synchronization to modulated auditory tones in schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and schizotypal personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2003;160:2238-2240.
22.
Hamm JP, Gilmore CS, Picchetti NA, Sponheim SR, Clementz BA: Abnormalities of neuronal oscillations and temporal integration to low- and high-frequency auditory stimulation in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2011;69:989-996.
23.
Hong LE, Summerfelt A, McMahon R, et al: Evoked gamma band synchronization and the liability for schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2004;70:293-302.
24.
Lenz D, Fischer S, Schadow J, Bogerts B, Herrmann CS: Altered evoked γ-band responses as a neurophysiological marker of schizophrenia? Int J Psychophysiol 2011;79:25-31.
25.
Light GA, Hsu JL, Hsieh MH, et al: Gamma band oscillations reveal neural network cortical coherence dysfunction in schizophrenia patients. Biol Psychiatry 2006;60:1231-1240.
26.
Edgar JC, Chen YH, Lanza M, et al: Cortical thickness as a contributor to abnormal oscillations in schizophrenia? NeuroImage Clin 2014;4:122-129.
27.
Wilson TW, Rojas DC, Reite ML, Teale PD, Rogers SJ: Children and adolescents with autism exhibit reduced MEG steady-state gamma responses. Biol Psychiatry 2007;62:192-197.
28.
Rojas DC, Teale PD, Maharajh K, et al: Transient and steady-state auditory gamma-band responses in first-degree relatives of people with autism spectrum disorder. Mol Autism 2011;2:11.
29.
Maurizi M, Almadori G, Paludetti G, et al: 40-Hz steady-state responses in newborns and in children. Audiology 1990;29:322-328.
30.
Stapells DR, Galambos R, Costello JA, Makeig S: Inconsistency of auditory middle latency and steady-state responses in infants. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988;71:289-295.
31.
Aoyagi M, Kiren T, Furuse H, et al: Effects of aging on amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1994;511:15-22.
32.
Rojas DC, Maharajh K, Teale PD, et al: Development of the 40 Hz steady state auditory evoked magnetic field from ages 5 to 52. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:110-117.
33.
Cho RY, Walker CP, Polizzotto NR, et al: Development of sensory gamma oscillations and cross-frequency coupling from childhood to early adulthood. Cereb Cortex 2015;25:1509-1518.
34.
Poulsen C, Picton TW, Paus T: Age-related changes in transient and oscillatory brain responses to auditory stimulation during early adolescence. Dev Sci 2009;12:220-235.
35.
Herdman AT, Wollbrink A, Chau W, et al: Determination of activation areas in the human auditory cortex by means of synthetic aperture magnetometry. NeuroImage 2003;20:995-1005.
36.
Ross B, Herdman AT, Pantev C: Right hemispheric laterality of human 40 Hz auditory steady-state responses. Cereb Cortex 2005;15:2029-2039.
37.
Ross B, Picton TW, Pantev C: Temporal integration in the human auditory cortex as represented by the development of the steady-state magnetic field. Hear Res 2002;165:68-84.
38.
Lord C, Risi S, Lambrecht L, et al: The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. J Autism Dev Disord 2000;30:205-223.
39.
Lord C, Rutter M, Le Couteur A: Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: a revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 1994;24:659-685.
40.
Taulu S, Simola J: Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements. Phys Med Biol 2006;51:1759-1768.
41.
Roberts TP, Khan SY, Rey M, et al: MEG detection of delayed auditory evoked responses in autism spectrum disorders: towards an imaging biomarker for autism. Autism Res 2010;3:8-18.
42.
Jacobson GP, Fitzgerald MB: Auditory evoked gamma band potential in normal subjects. J Am Acad Audiol 1997;8:44-52.
43.
Pantev C: Evoked and induced gamma-band activity of the human cortex. Brain Topogr 1995;7:321-330.
44.
Scherg M, Von Cramon D: Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985;62:32-44.
45.
Ponton C, Eggermont JJ, Khosla D, Kwong B, Don M: Maturation of human central auditory system activity: separating auditory evoked potentials by dipole source modeling. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113:407-420.
46.
Hoechstetter K, Bornfleth H, Weckesser D, et al: BESA source coherence: a new method to study cortical oscillatory coupling. Brain Topogr 2004;16:233-238.
47.
Berg P, Scherg M: A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;90:229-241.
48.
Lins OG, Picton TW, Berg P, Scherg M: Ocular artifacts in recording EEGs and event-related potentials. II. Source dipoles and source components. Brain Topogr 1993;6:65-78.
49.
Scherg M, Ebersole JS: Models of brain sources. Brain Topogr 1993;5:419-423.
50.
Scherg M, Ille N, Bornfleth H, Berg P: Advanced tools for digital EEG review: virtual source montages, whole-head mapping, correlation, and phase analysis. J Clin Neurophysiol 2002;19:91-112.
51.
Papp N, Ktonas P: Critical evaluation of complex demodulation techniques for the quantification of bioelectrical activity. Biomed Sci Instrum 1977;13:135-145.
52.
Edgar JC, Khan SY, Blaskey L, et al: Neuromagnetic oscillations predict evoked-response latency delays and core language deficits in autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 2015;45:395-405.
53.
Edgar JC, Hanlon FM, Huang MX, et al: Superior temporal gyrus spectral abnormalities in schizophrenia. Psychophysiology 2008;45:812-824.
54.
Fischl B, Dale AM: Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:11050-11055.
55.
Edgar JC, Hunter MA, Huang M, et al: Temporal and frontal cortical thickness associations with M100 auditory activity and attention in healthy controls and individuals with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2012;140:250-257.
56.
Constantino JN, Davis SA, Todd RD, et al: Validation of a brief quantitative measure of autistic traits: comparison of the Social Responsiveness Scale with the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised. J Autism Dev Disord 2003;33:427-433.
57.
Shahin AJ, Roberts LE, Miller LM, McDonald KL, Alain C: Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to the N1 and P2 auditory evoked responses modulated by spectral complexity of sounds. Brain Topogr 2007;20:55-61.
58.
Bohorquez J, Ozdamar O: Generation of the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) explained using convolution. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119:2598-2607.
59.
Yvert B, Crouzeix A, Bertrand O, Seither- Preisler A, Pantev C: Multiple supratemporal sources of magnetic and electric auditory evoked middle latency components in humans. Cereb Cortex 2001;11:411-423.
60.
Pantev C, Elbert T, Makeig S, et al: Relationship of transient and steady-state auditory evoked fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993;88:389-396.
61.
Ponton CW, Moore JK, Eggermont JJ: Prolonged deafness limits auditory system developmental plasticity: evidence from an evoked potentials study in children with cochlear implants. Scand Audiol Suppl 1999;51:13-22.
62.
Moore JK, Guan YL: Cytoarchitectural and axonal maturation in human auditory cortex. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2001;2:297-311.
63.
Moore JK, Linthicum FH Jr: The human auditory system: a timeline of development. Int J Audiol 2007;46:460-478.
64.
Gaetz W, Macdonald M, Cheyne D, Snead OC: Neuromagnetic imaging of movement-related cortical oscillations in children and adults: age predicts post-movement beta rebound. NeuroImage 2010;51:792-807.
65.
Berchicci M, Zhang T, Romero L, et al: Development of mu rhythm in infants and preschool children. Dev Neurosci 2011;33:130-143.
66.
Klimesch W: EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 1999;29:169-195.
67.
Edgar JC, Heiken K, Chen YH, et al: Resting-state alpha in autism spectrum disorder and alpha associations with thalamic volume. J Autism Dev Disord 2015;45:795-804.
68.
Ehlers CL, Wills DN, Desikan A, Phillips E, Havstad J: Decreases in energy and increases in phase locking of event-related oscillations to auditory stimuli occur during adolescence in human and rodent brain. Dev Neurosci 2014;36:175-195.
69.
Huttenlocher PR, Dabholkar AS: Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. J Comp Neurol 1997;387:167-178.
70.
Gao WJ, Newman DE, Wormington AB, Pallas SL: Development of inhibitory circuitry in visual and auditory cortex of postnatal ferrets: immunocytochemical localization of GABAergic neurons. J Comp Neurol 1999;409:261-273.
71.
Gogtay N, Giedd JN, Lusk L, et al: Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:8174-8179.
72.
Port RG, Ku M, Murray R, Blaskey L, Roberts TPL: Confirmation of M100 latency and gamma-band response maturation in healthy children and children with ASD using longitudinal study design. International Society for Autism Research 2015.
73.
Gross J, Baillet S, Barnes GR, et al: Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research. NeuroImage 2013;65:349-363.
74.
Ross B, Borgmann C, Draganova R, Roberts LE, Pantev C: A high-precision magnetoencephalographic study of human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones. J Acoust Soc Am 2000;108:679-691.
75.
Hipp JF, Siegel M: Dissociating neuronal gamma-band activity from cranial and ocular muscle activity in EEG. Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7:338.
76.
Lazzouni L, Ross B, Voss P, Lepore F: Neuromagnetic auditory steady-state responses to amplitude modulated sounds following dichotic or monaural presentation. Clin Neurophysiol 2010;121:200-207.
77.
Ross B, Picton TW, Herdman AT, Pantev C: The effect of attention on the auditory steady-state response. Neurol Clin Neurophysiol 2004;2004:22.
78.
Tiitinen H, Sinkkonen J, Reinikainen K, et al: Selective attention enhances the auditory 40-Hz transient response in humans. Nature 1993;364:59-60.
79.
Herdman AT: Neuroimaging evidence for top-down maturation of selective auditory attention. Brain Topogr 2011;24:271-278.
80.
Edgar JC, Heiken K, Chen Y, Herrington J, Chow V, Liu S, Bloy L, Huang MX, Pandey J, Cannon K, Qasmieh S, Levy SE, Schultz R, Roberts TPL: Resting-state alpha in autism spectrum disorder and alpha associations with thalamic volume. J Autism Dev Disord 2015;45:795-804.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.