Traumatic brain injury in children commonly involves the frontal lobes and is associated with distinct structural and behavioral changes. Despite the clinical significance of injuries localized to this region during brain development, the mechanisms underlying secondary damage and long-term recovery are poorly understood. Here, we have characterized the first model of unilateral focal traumatic injury to the developing frontal lobe. Male C57Bl/6J mice at postnatal day (p)21, an age approximating a toddler-aged child, received a controlled cortical impact or sham surgery to the left frontal lobe and were euthanized 1 or 7 days later. A necrotic cavity and local inflammatory response were largely confined to the unilateral frontal lobe, dorsal corpus callosum and striatum anterior to the bregma. While cell death and accumulated β-amyloid precursor protein were characteristic features of the pericontusional motor cortex, corpus callosum, cingulum and dorsal striatum, underlying structures including the hippocampus showed no overt pathology. To determine the long-term functional consequences of injury at p21, two additional cohorts were subjected to a battery of behavioral tests in adolescence (p35-45) or adulthood (p70-80). In both cohorts, brain-injured mice showed normal levels of anxiety, sociability, spatial learning and memory. The signature phenotypic features were deficits in motor function and motor learning, coincident with a reduction in ipsilateral cortical brain volumes. Together, these findings demonstrate classic morphological features of a focal traumatic injury, including early cell death and axonal injury, and long-term volumetric loss of cortical volumes. The presence of deficits in sensorimotor function and coordination in the absence of abnormal findings related to anxiety, sociability and memory likely reflects several variables, including the unique location of the injury and the emergence of favorable compensatory mechanisms during subsequent brain development.

1.
Langlois JA: Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Assessing Outcomes in Children. Atlanta, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 2000. http://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/pdf/TBI_assessing.pdf.
2.
Claus CP, Tsuru-Aoyagi K, Adwanikar H, Walker B, Manvelyan H, Whetstone W, Noble-Haeusslein LJ: Age is a determinant of leukocyte infiltration and loss of cortical volume after traumatic brain injury. Dev Neurosci 2010;32:454-465.
3.
Potts MB, Koh SE, Whetstone WD, Walker BA, Yoneyama T, Claus CP, Manvelyan HM, Noble-Haeusslein LJ: Traumatic injury to the immature brain: inflammation, oxidative injury, and iron-mediated damage as potential therapeutic targets. NeuroReport 2006;3:143-153.
4.
Tsuru-Aoyagi K, Potts MB, Trivedi A, Pfankuch T, Raber J, Wendland M, Claus CP, Koh SE, Ferriero D, Noble-Haeusslein LJ: Glutathione peroxidase activity modulates recovery in the injured immature brain. Ann Neurol 2009;65:540-549.
5.
Anderson V, Godfrey C, Rosenfeld JV, Catroppa C: 10 years outcome from childhood traumatic brain injury. Int J Dev Neurosci 2012;30:217-224.
6.
Levin HS, Zhang L, Dennis M, Ewing-Cobbs L, Schachar R, Max J, Landis JA, Roberson G, Scheibel RS, Miller DL, Hunter JV: Psychosocial outcome of TBI in children with unilateral frontal lesions. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2004;10:305-316.
7.
Anderson V, Jacobs R, Harvey AS: Prefrontal lesions and attentional skills in childhood. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2005;11:817-831.
8.
Eslinger PJ, Biddle KR: Adolescent neuropsychological development after early right prefrontal cortex damage. Dev Neuropsychol 2000;18:297-329.
9.
Wilde EA, Hunter JV, Newsome MR, Scheibel RS, Bigler ED, Johnson JL, Fearing MA, Cleavinger HB, Li X, Swank PR, Pedroza C, Roberson GS, Bachevalier J, Levin HS: Frontal and temporal morphometric findings on MRI in children after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2005;22:333-344.
10.
Lindner MD, Plone MA, Cain CK, Frydel B, Francis JM, Emerich DF, Sutton RL: Dissociable long-term cognitive deficits after frontal versus sensorimotor cortical contusions. J Neurotrauma 1998;15:199-216.
11.
Hoane MR, Lasley LA, Akstulewicz SL: Middle age increases tissue vulnerability and impairs sensorimotor and cognitive recovery following traumatic brain injury in the rat. Behav Brain Res 2004;153:189-197.
12.
Bravo TP, Matchett GA, Jadhav V, Martin RD, Jourdain A, Colohan A, Zhang JH, Tang J: Role of histamine in brain protection in surgical brain injury in mice. Brain Res 2008;1205:100-107.
13.
Jadhav V, Matchett G, Hsu FP, Zhang JH: Inhibition of Src tyrosine kinase and effect on outcomes in a new in vivo model of surgically induced brain injury. J Neurosurg 2007;106:680-686.
14.
Kilbourne M, Kuehn R, Tosun C, Caridi J, Keledjian K, Bochicchio G, Scalea T, Gerzanich V, Simard JM: Novel model of frontal impact closed head injury in the rat. J Neurotrauma 2009;26:2233-2243.
15.
Tong W, Igarashi T, Ferriero DM, Noble LJ: Traumatic brain injury in the immature mouse brain: characterization of regional vulnerability. Exp Neurol 2002;176:105-116.
16.
Pullela R, Raber J, Pfankuch T, Ferriero DM, Claus CP, Koh SE, Yamauchi T, Rola R, Fike JR, Noble-Haeusslein LJ: Traumatic injury to the immature brain results in progressive neuronal loss, hyperactivity and delayed cognitive impairments. Dev Neurosci 2006;28:396-409.
17.
Spencer CM, Alekseyenko O, Serysheva E, Yuva-Paylor LA, Paylor R: Altered anxiety-related and social behaviors in the Fmr1 knockout mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Genes Brain Behav 2005;4:420-430.
18.
Semple BD, Canchola SA, Noble-Haeusslein LJ: Deficits in social behavior emerge during development after pediatric traumatic brain injury in mice. J Neurotrauma 2012;29:2672-2683.
19.
Duvoisin RM, Villasana L, Davis MJ, Winder DG, Raber J: Opposing roles of mGluR8 in measures of anxiety involving non-social and social challenges. Behav Brain Res 2011;221:50-54.
20.
Yang M, Silverman JL, Crawley JN: Automated three-chambered social approach task for mice. Curr Protoc Neurosci 2011;chapter 8:unit 8.26.
21.
Ryan BC, Young NB, Moy SS, Crawley JN: Olfactory cues are sufficient to elicit social approach behaviors but not social transmission of food preference in C57BL/6J mice. Behav Brain Res 2008;193:235-242.
22.
Yang M, Crawley JN: Simple behavioral assessment of mouse olfaction. Curr Protoc Neurosci 2009;chapter 8:unit 8.24.
23.
Johnson VE, Stewart W, Smith DH: Axonal pathology in traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol 2012;246:35-43.
24.
Moy SS, Nadler JJ, Perez A, Barbaro RP, Johns JM, Magnuson TR, Piven J, Crawley JN: Sociability and preference for social novelty in five inbred strains: an approach to assess autistic-like behavior in mice. Genes Brain Behav 2004;3:287-302.
25.
Gerlai R: Behavioral tests of hippocampal function: simple paradigms, complex problems. Behav Brain Res 2001;125:269-277.
26.
Yoneyama-Sarnecky T, Olivas AD, Azari S, Ferriero DM, Manvelyan HM, Noble-Haeusslein LJ: Heme oxygenase-2 modulates early pathogenesis after traumatic injury to the immature brain. Dev Neurosci 2010;32:81-90.
27.
Oni MB, Wilde EA, Bigler ED, McCauley SR, Wu TC, Yallampalli R, Chu Z, Li X, Hunter JV, Vasquez AC, Levin HS: Diffusion tensor imaging analysis of frontal lobes in pediatric traumatic brain injury. J Child Neurol 2010;25:976-984.
28.
Wilde EA, Merkley TL, Bigler ED, Max JE, Schmidt AT, Ayoub KW, McCauley SR, Hunter JV, Hanten G, Li X, Chu ZD, Levin HS: Longitudinal changes in cortical thickness in children after traumatic brain injury and their relation to behavioral regulation and emotional control. Int J Dev Neurosci 2012;30:267-276.
29.
Wilde EA, Ayoub KW, Bigler ED, Chu ZD, Hunter JV, Wu TC, McCauley SR, Levin HS: Diffusion tensor imaging in moderate-to-severe pediatric traumatic brain injury: changes within an 18 month post-injury interval. Brain Imaging Behav 2012;6:404-416.
30.
Kolb B, Whishaw IQ: Neonatal frontal lesions in hamsters impair species-typical behaviors and reduce brain weight and neocortical thickness. Behav Neurosci 1985;99:691-706.
31.
Goldman PS: Functional recovery after lesions of the nervous systems. 3. Developmental processes in neural plasticity. Recovery of function after CNS lesions in infant monkeys. Neurosci Res Program Bull 1974;12:217-222.
32.
Lemon RN, Griffiths J: Comparing the function of the corticospinal system in different species: organizational differences for motor specialization? Muscle Nerve 2005;32:261-279.
33.
Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Hoppe B, Golge M, Dreesmann M, Damm-Stunitz U, Ritz A: Sensorimotor recovery in children after traumatic brain injury: analyses of gait, gross motor, and fine motor skills. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003;45:821-828.
34.
Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Stolze H, Golge M, Ritz A: Analyses of gait, reaching, and grasping in children after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:424-430.
35.
Katz-Leurer M, Rotem H, Lewitus H, Keren O, Meyer S: Relationship between balance abilities and gait characteristics in children with post-traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2008;22:153-159.
36.
Basford JR, Chou LS, Kaufman KR, Brey RH, Walker A, Malec JF, Moessner AM, Brown AW: An assessment of gait and balance deficits after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:343-349.
37.
Williams G, Galna B, Morris ME, Olver J: Spatiotemporal deficits and kinematic classification of gait following a traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2010;25:366-374.
38.
Walker WC, Pickett TC: Motor impairment after severe traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal multicenter study. J Rehabil Res Dev 2007;44:975-982.
39.
Adelson PD, Fellows-Mayle W, Kochanek PM, Dixon CE: Morris water maze function and histologic characterization of two age-at-injury experimental models of controlled cortical impact in the immature rat. Childs Nerv Syst 2013;29:43-53.
40.
Adelson PD, Dixon CE, Robichaud P, Kochanek PM: Motor and cognitive functional deficits following diffuse traumatic brain injury in the immature rat. J Neurotrauma 1997;14:99-108.
41.
Prins ML, Hovda DA: Traumatic brain injury in the developing rat: effects of maturation on Morris water maze acquisition. J Neurotrauma 1998;15:799-811.
42.
Adelson PD, Dixon CE, Kochanek PM: Long-term dysfunction following diffuse traumatic brain injury in the immature rat. J Neurotrauma 2000;17:273-282.
43.
Ajao DO, Pop V, Kamper JE, Adami A, Rudobeck E, Huang L, Vlkolinsky R, Hartman RE, Ashwal S, Obenaus A, Badaut J: Traumatic brain injury in young rats leads to progressive behavioral deficits coincident with altered tissue properties in adulthood. J Neurotrauma 2012;29:2060-2074.
44.
File SE: Factors controlling measures of anxiety and responses to novelty in the mouse. Behav Brain Res 2001;125:151-157.
45.
Lalonde R, Strazielle C: Relations between open-field, elevated plus-maze, and emergence tests as displayed by C57/BL6J and BALB/c mice. J Neurosci Methods 2008;171:48-52.
46.
Depino AM, Gross C: Simultaneous assessment of autonomic function and anxiety-related behavior in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. Behav Brain Res 2007;177:254-260.
47.
Kolb B, Gibb R, Gorny G: Cortical plasticity and the development of behavior after early frontal cortical injury. Dev Neuropsychol 2000;18:423-444.
48.
Jacobs R, Harvey AS, Anderson V: Executive function following focal frontal lobe lesions: impact of timing of lesion on outcome. Cortex 2007;43:792-805.
49.
Karver CL, Wade SL, Cassedy A, Taylor HG, Stancin T, Yeates KO, Walz NC: Age at injury and long-term behavior problems after traumatic brain injury in young children. Rehabil Psychol 2012;57:256-265.
50.
Spencer-Smith M, Anderson V: Healthy and abnormal development of the prefrontal cortex. Dev Neurorehabil 2009;12:279-297.
51.
Semple BD, Blomgren K, Gimlin K, Ferriero DM, Noble-Haeusslein LJ: Brain development in rodents and humans: identifying benchmarks of maturation and vulnerability to injury across species. Prog Neurobiol 2013;106-107:1-16.
52.
Kolb B, Holmes C, Whishaw IQ: Recovery from early cortical lesions in rats. III. Neonatal removal of posterior parietal cortex has greater behavioral and anatomical effects than similar removals in adulthood. Behav Brain Res 1987;26:119-137.
53.
Rudebeck PH, Walton ME, Millette BH, Shirley E, Rushworth MF, Bannerman DM: Distinct contributions of frontal areas to emotion and social behaviour in the rat. Eur J Neurosci 2007;26:2315-2326.
54.
Rudebeck PH, Buckley MJ, Walton ME, Rushworth MF: A role for the macaque anterior cingulate gyrus in social valuation. Science 2006;313:1310-1312.
55.
Martens KM, Vonder Haar C, Hutsell BA, Hoane MR: A discrimination task used as a novel method of testing decision-making behavior following traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2012;29:2505-2512.
56.
Levin HS, Hanten G: Executive functions after traumatic brain injury in children. Pediatr Neurol 2005;33:79-93.
57.
Hu P, Fan J, Xu P, Zhou S, Zhang L, Tian Y, Wang K: Attention network impairments in patients with focal frontal or parietal lesions. Neurosci Lett 2013;534:177-181.
58.
Laviola G, Macri S, Morley-Fletcher S, Adriani W: Risk-taking behavior in adolescent mice: psychobiological determinants and early epigenetic influence. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2003;27:19-31.
59.
Spear L: Modeling adolescent development and alcohol use in animals. Alcohol Res Health 2000;24:115-123.
60.
Salchner P, Lubec G, Singewald N: Decreased social interaction in aged rats may not reflect changes in anxiety-related behaviour. Behav Brain Res 2004;151:1-8.
61.
Spreng M, Rossier J, Schenk F: Spaced training facilitates long-term retention of place navigation in adult but not in adolescent rats. Behav Brain Res 2002;128:103-108.
62.
Cestari V, Lucidi A, Pieroni L, Rossi-Arnaud C: Memory for object location: a span study in children. Can J Exp Psychol 2007;61:13-20.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.