Experience in early life can affect the development of the nervous system. There is now evidence that experience-dependent plasticity exists in adult insects. To uncover the molecular basis of plasticity, an invertebrate model, such as Drosophila melanogaste r, is a powerful tool, as many established genetic and molecular methods can be applied. To establish a model system in which behavioral plasticity can be examined, we investigated the optomotor response, a behavior common to most sight-reliant animals, in Drosophila and found that the response could be modified by the level of light during rearing. The angle turned by the head in response to a moving stimulus was used to quantify the response. Deprivation of light increased the response to low-contrast stimuli in wild-type Drosophila at 4 days after eclosion and this plastic change did not appear in rutabaga, a known mutant defective in short-term memory. In addition, the change was transient and was markedly decreased at 6 days after eclosion. Further, we found that Dark-flies, which have been kept in constant darkness for more than 50 years, showed a higher response to low-contrast stimuli even at 6 days after eclosion compared to wild type and this characteristic was not lost in Dark-flies placed in a normal light environment for 2 generations, suggesting that this high response has a hereditary nature. Thus, our model system can be used to examine how the environment affects behaviors.

Keywords:
Optomotor response, Drosophila melanogaster, Visual system, Dark-fly, Plasticity
1.
Tieman SB, Hirsch HV: Exposure to lines of only one orientation modifies dendritic morphology of cells in the visual cortex of the cat. J Comp Neurol 1982;211:353- 362.
2.
Hirsch HV: The role of visual experience in the development of cat striate cortex. Cell Mol Neurobiol 1985;5:103-121.
3.
Mimura K: Developmental of visual pattern discrimination in the fly depends on light experience. Science 1986;232:83-85.
4.
Technau GM: Fiber number in the mushroom bodies of adult Drosophila melanogaster depends on age, sex and experience. J Neurogenet 1984;1:113-126.
5.
Balling A, Technau G, Heisenberg M: Are the structural changes in adult Drosophila mushroom bodies memory traces? Studies on biochemical learning mutants. J Neurogenet 1987;4:65-73.
6.
Barth M, Hirsch HV, Meinertzhagen IA, Heisenberg M: Experience-dependent developmental plasticity in the optic lobe of Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurosci 1997;17:1493-1504.
7.
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN: The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens. J Physiol 1970;206:419-436.
8.
Morishita H, Hensch TK: Critical period revisited: impact on vision. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2008;18:101-107.
9.
Jarecki J, Keshishian H: Role of neural activity during synaptogenesis in Drosophila. J Neurosci 1995;15:8177-8190.
10.
Kral K, Meinertzhagen IA: Anatomical plasticity of synapses in the lamina of the optic lobe of the fly. Phil Trans R Soc Lond Biol Sci 1989;323:155-183.
11.
Mori S: Changes of characters of Drosophila melanogaster brought about during life in constant darkness and considerations on the processes through which these changes were induced. Zool Sci 1986;3:945-957.
12.
Mori S: Variations of Drosophila in relation to its environment VIII. Change of behavior of Drosophila melanogaster as seen during 581 generations kept successively in total darkness. 2. Zool Mag 1983;92:138-148.
13.
Izutsu M, Zhou J, Sugiyama Y, Nishimura O, Aizu T, Toyoda A, Fujiyama A, Agata K, Fuse N: Genome features of ‘Dark-fly', a Drosophila line reared long-term in a dark environment. Plos One 2012;7:e33288.
14.
Levin LR, Han PL, Hwang PM, Feinstein PG, Davis RL, Reed RR: The Drosophila learning and memory gene rutabaga encodes a Ca2+/calmodulin-responsive adenylyl cyclase. Cell 1992;68:479-489.
15.
Renger J, Ueda A, Atwood HL, Govind CK, and Wu C-F: Role of cAMP cascade in synaptic stability and plasticity: ultrastructural and physiological analyses of individual synaptic boutons in Drosophila memory mutants. J Neurosci 2000;20:3980-3992.
16.
Imaizumi T: Elongation of head bristles found in a strain of Drosophila melanogaster, which have been kept under constant darkness for about 24 years. Jpn J Genet 1979;54:55-67.
17.
Imafuku M, Haramura T: Activity rhythm of Drosophila kept in complete darkness for 1,300 generations. Zool Sci 2011;28:195- 198.
18.
Heisenberg M, Wolf R: Vision in Drosophila; in Heisenberg M, Wolf R (eds): Genetics of Microbehavior. Heidelberg, Springer, 1984, p 264.
19.
Borst A, Haag J, Reiff DF: Fly motion vision. Annu Rev Neurosci 2010;33:49-70.
20.
Götz KG: Optomotor studies of the visual system of several eye mutants of the fruit fly Drosophila. Kybernetik 1964;2:77-92.
21.
Kirschfeld K: Tracking of small objects in front of a textured background by insects and vertebrates: phenomena and neural basis. Biol Cybern 1994;70:407-415.
22.
Götz KG: Course-control, metabolism and wing interference during ultra-long tethered flight in Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol 1987;128:35-46.
23.
Buchner E: Elementary movement detectors in an insect visual system. Biol Cybern 1976;24:85-101.
24.
Land MF: Head movement of flies during visually guided flight. Nature 1973;243:299-300.
25.
Zhu Y, Nern A, Zipursky SL, Frye MA: Peripheral visual circuits functionally segregate motion and phototaxis behaviors in the fly. Curr Biol 2009;19:613-619.
26.
Borst A, Egelhaaf M: Principles of visual motion detection. TINS 1989;12:297-306.
27.
Borst A, Haag J: Optic flow processing in the cockpit of the fly; in North G, Greenspan R (eds): Invertebrate Neurobiology. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2007, pp 101-122.
28.
Haag J, Denk W, Borst A: Fly motion vision is based on Reichardt detectors regardless of the signal-to-noise ratio. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:16333-16338.
29.
Fermi G, Reichardt W: Optomotor reactions of the fly, Musca domestica. Dependence of the reaction on wave length, velocity, contrast and median brightness of periodically moved stimulus patterns. Kybernetik 1963;2:15-28.
30.
Eckert H: Optomotor studies on the visual system of the housefly Musca domestica L. Determination of optic resolution-power, contrast sensitivity and of light-flow in complex-eye receptors as function of environmental brightness. Kybernetik 1973;14:1-23.
31.
Reiser MB, Dickinson MH: A modular display system for insect behavioral neuroscience. J Neurosci Methods 2008;167:127-139.
32.
Joesch M, Plett J, Borst A, Reiff DF: Response properties of motion-sensitive visual interneurons in the lobula plate of Drosophila melanogaster. Curr Biol 2008;18:368-374.
33.
Harris RA, O'Carroll DC, Laughlin SB: Contrast gain reduction in fly motion adaptation. Neuron 2000;28:595-606.
34.
Karmeier K, Tabor R, Egelhaaf M, Krapp HG: Early visual experience and the receptive-field organization of optic flow processing interneurons in the fly motion pathway. Visual Neurosci 2001;18:1-8.
35.
Scott EK, Reuter JE, Luo L: Dendric development of Drosophila high order visual system neurons is independent of sensory experience. BMC Neurosci 2003;4:1-6.
36.
Chiappe ME, Seelig JD, Reiser MB, Jayaraman V: Walking modulates speed sensitivity in Drosophila motion vision. Curr Biol 2010;20:1470-1475.
37.
Zhong Y, Wu C-F: Neuronal activity and adenylyl cyclase in environment-dependent plasticity of axonal outgrowth in Drosophila. J Neurosci 2004;24:1439-1445.
38.
Rister J, Pauls D, Schnell B, Ting CY, Lee CH, Sinakevitch I, Morante J, Strausfeld NJ, Ito K, Heisenberg M: Dissection of the peripheral motion channel in the visual system of Drosophila melanogaster. Neuron 2007;56:155-170.
39.
Deimel E, Kral K: Long-term sensitivity adjustment of the compound eyes of the housefly Musuca domestica during early adult life. J Insect Physiol 1992;38:425-430.
40.
Sanes DH, Reh TA, Harris WA: Refinement synaptic connections; in Sanes DH, Reh TA, Harris WA (eds): Development of the Nervous System. San Diego, Academic Press, 2000, pp 349-403.
41.
Kroger RHH, Knoblauch B, Wagner H-J: Rearing in different photic and spectral environments changes the optomotor response to chromatic stimuli in the cichlid fish Aequidens pulcher. J Exp Biol 2003;206:1643-1648.
42.
Wagner H-J, Kroger RH: Adaptive plasticity during the development of color vision. Prog Retin Eye Res 2005;24:521-536.
43.
Greiner B, Ribi WA, Warrant EJ: A neural network to improve dim-light vision? Dendritic fields of first-order interneurons in the nocturnal bee Megalopta genalis. Cell Tissue Res 2005;322:313-320.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.