Abstract
We discuss the presentation and management of a young person who presented to the emergency department with butane toxicity. A delay in recognition of butane toxicity can have fatal consequences. On the contrary, prompt recognition of the clinical scenario by physicians can lead to early commencement of appropriate treatment with a potential for full recovery.
Introduction
Volatile solvent abuse, including that due to butane gas (contained in cigarette lighter fuel), is common among young people for achieving a quick “high” because of ease of availability of cigarette lighter fuel. Butane inhalation can cause brain permanent damage due to asphyxia. However, butane is also cardiotoxic and can cause both ventricular fibrillation as well as cardiac arrest.
Case Report
A 25-year-old woman was brought in by ambulance to the accident and emergency (A&E) department as a case of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, but the exact time of onset was not known as the patient had been found unconscious in her bedroom. Taking a collateral history from the next of kin, there were no constitutional or systemic symptoms such as fever, night sweats, shortness of breath, or chest pain in the hours and days preceding her cardiac arrest. However, 2 empty canisters of butane gas (total 300 mL) were found by her bed side.
On examination in the A&E, her pupils were equal (3 mm) but sluggishly reactive to light. The Glasgow Coma Scale score was 5/15 (E1, V1, and M3). An electrocardiogram subsequently showed fine ventricular fibrillation which was terminated with direct electrical cardioversion, and she was given 2 ampoules of adrenaline intravenously. She was taken to the intensive care unit (ICU), intubated, and ventilated with 100% oxygen.
Laboratory tests on admission are shown in Table 1. She had an electroencephalogram twice while off sedation, neither of which showed any evidence of seizure activity but did suggest she had a diffuse brain injury (Fig. 1). An MRI scan of the head after admission showed evidence of hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury (Fig. 2) and slightly high signal in basal ganglia (Table 2 for differential diagnoses [1]). A follow-up MRI scan after a month showed established bilateral occipital infarcts and brain atrophy (Fig. 3).
Once sedation was stopped after a couple of days in the ICU, she was left in an akinetic and mute state. The most distressing feature for the family was the florid post-hypoxic myoclonus. This took several days to control with escalating dose of several anti-epileptic drugs (levetiracetam, sodium valproate, and clonazepam). She spent a nearly month on the ICU and required a tracheostomy but was able to breathe spontaneously. She had nasogastric tube feeding and regular physiotherapy but remained cognitively impaired with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 6/15 (E4, V1, and M1) and tetraplegic. She spent a further 3 weeks on the neurology ward for neurorehabilitation where she had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and was later transferred to a long-term rehabilitation facility as there was no further improvement in her clinical state.
Discussion/Conclusion
Volatile solvent abuse is one of the most common forms of drug abuse in the 11–15 year age group in En-gland and Wales. It is estimated that in the UK, 3.5–10% of young people have at least experimented with volatile solvents and that 0.5–1% are current users of volatile solvents [2]. Butane (and isobutane), which is a component of cigarette lighter fuel, can be easily abused because cigarette lighters and lighter fuel are not contraband. One of the major pathophysiological mechanisms of butane toxicity to the brain is related to asphyxia, which is due to the displacement of oxygen by butane in the lungs [3]. This can result in permanent and severe brain damage due to hypoxia. Butane also seems to have a cardiotoxic effect and can induce ventricular fibrillation and subsequent cardiac arrest [4] as we report in our case.
Toxicological examination, where no clear history is available, can be used to confirm butane gas in blood and urine samples by means of gas chromatography [5]. However, if there is a long delay in sending blood samples to the appropriate laboratory, butane can still be detected in adipose tissue at autopsy up to 2 weeks after death from suspected butane inhalation [6]. Since we had a clear history of butane abuse and no exposure to any other toxins or burning stoves or gas heaters, we did not request chromatographic analysis of blood samples for butane or request carboxyhaemoglobin levels in blood. Unfortunately, there are no specific antidotes for inhalant intoxication [7].
Treatment involves ventilation and oxygenation, while closely monitoring blood gases to prevent the damaging effects of prolonged hypoxia on the brain, blood pressure homeostasis that sometimes requires the use of vasopressors such as dopamine or norepinephrine to preserve brain perfusion [8, 9], close monitoring, and aggressive treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, ideally in an ICU setting. If intubation is required, the patient should be anaesthetised as sudden surge of catecholamines during the process of intubation can provoke ventricular arrhythmias [8]. Furthermore, one has to be cautious in administering large doses of catecholamines, such as adrenaline injections, during resuscitation as that can also provoke recurrent ventricular fibrillation [9].
Despite the presence of cerebral oedema after cardiorespiratory arrest following butane inhalation (indicating brain injury), prompt management of the hypoxia in an ICU and aggressive management of cardiac arrhythmias with anti-arrhythmic agents [9] can lead to a complete recovery with no sequelae [9, 10], but time is of the essence to obtain such an outcome. Any delay in such timely intervention may leave the patient with significantly impaired cognitive function as in our case or be left in a permanent vegetative state. A patient presenting to the A&E with suspected butane toxicity should be admitted to the ICU even if no cardiac arrhythmias are evident initially on a standard 12-lead ECG for telemetry and close observation because they can later develop arrhythmias due to a catecholamine surge.
Conclusion
In summary, this case should warn us against being complacent when managing young people attending the A&E with suspected solvent abuse even if they do not look seriously unwell at presentation.
Statement of Ethics
Ethical approval is not required for this case report as all data is anonymized and a formal written consent was obtained for publishing this case report. As the patient lacked the capacity to read or write, the written informed consent was obtained from the patient family for publishing the case report and any accompanying images.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Funding Sources
The authors did not receive any funding for this study.
Author Contributions
All the authors contributed equally to the article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.