Background: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of on-demand therapy using 20-mg vonoprazan for mild reflux esophagitis (RE). Methods: On-demand therapy by taking one 20-mg tablet of vonoprazan only when reflux symptoms occurred was performed for 24 weeks using 30 patients with mild RE who were receiving maintenance therapy with proton pomp inhibitors (PPIs). The presence or absence of RE, degree of overall satisfaction with the treatment, score of symptoms, and fasting gastrin level before breakfast were examined before and after on-demand therapy. The number of tablets taken during the 24-week period was also noted. Results: One of the 30 patients dropped out of on-demand therapy 1 week after its initiation. Remission was maintained in 25 (86.2%) of the 29 patients (all 10 [100%] Los Angeles classification grade A patients and 15 (78.9%) of the 19 grade B patients). However, 4 grade B patients exhibited grade B relapse. There were no differences in the degree of overall satisfaction, score of symptoms or the gastrin level between PPI and on-demand therapies. The number of vonoprazan tablets taken during the observation period was 33 tablets (median)/24 weeks. Conclusion: On-demand therapy using 20-mg vonoprazan tablets is an effective alternative maintenance therapy for mild RE.

Keywords:
Mild reflux esophagitis, Vonoprazan, On-demand therapy, Maintenance therapy
1.
Iwakiri K, Kinoshita Y, Habu Y, Oshima T, Manabe N, Fujiwara Y, Nagahara A, Kawamura O, Iwakiri R, Ozawa S, Ashida K, Ohara S, Kashiwagi H, Adachi K, Higuchi K, Miwa H, Fujimoto K, Kusano M, Hoshihara Y, Kawano T, Haruma K, Hongo M, Sugano K, Watanabe M, Shimosegawa T: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2015. J Gastroenterol 2016; 51: 751–767.
2.
Manabe N, Yoshihara M, Sasaki A, Tanaka S, Haruma K, Chayama K: Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with low-grade reflux esophagitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 17: 949-954
3.
Manabe N, Haruma K: Optimal acid suppressive treatment for adequate symptom relief and prevention of the complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease: differences in long term clinical course and pathophysiology among disease subtypes. Esophagus 2017; 14: 113–121.
4.
Glise H, Hallerbäck B, Johansson B: Quality-of-life assessments in evaluation of laparoscopic Rosetti fundoplication. Surg Endos 1995; 9: 183–189.
5.
Pace F, Tonini M, Pallotta S, Molteni P, Porro GB: Systematic review: maintenance treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with proton pump inhibitors taken “on-demand”. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26: 195–204.
6.
Bayerdörffer E, Bigard MA, Weiss W, Mearin F, Rodrigo L, Dominguez Muñoz JE, Grundling H, Persson T, Svedberg LE, Keeling N, Eklund S: Randomized, multicenter study: on-demand versus continuous maintenance treatment with esomeprazole in patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. BMC Gastroenterol 2016; 16: 48
7.
Sakurai Y, Mori Y, Okamoto H, Nishimura A, Komura E, Araki T, Shiramoto M: Acid-inhibitory effects of vonoprazan 20 mg compared with esomeprazole 20 mg or rabeprazole 10 mg in healthy adult male subjects – a randomised open-label cross-over study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015; 42: 719–730.
8.
Furuta K, Kohata Y, Fujiwara Y, Sugimoto M, Uotani T, Yamade M, Sahara S, Ichikawa H, Furuta T, Nio K, Iwakiri R, Inamori M, Kawamura O, Kusano M, Kato M, Kawami N, Iwakiri K, Takeuchi T, Higuchi K, Aimi M, Naora K, Fujimoto K, Arakawa T, Kinoshita Y: Intra-gastric pH following single oral administrations of rabeprazole and esomeprazole: double-blind cross-over comparison. J Clin Biochem Nutr 2014; 55: 178–183.
9.
Bell NJ, Hunt RH: Time to maximum effect of lansoprazole on gastric pH in normal male volunteers. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1996; 10: 897–904.
10.
Norris V, Baisley K, Dunn K, Warrington S, Morocutti A: Combined analysis of three crossover clinical pharmacology studies of effects of rabeprazole and esomeprazole on 24-h intragastric pH in healthy volunteers. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 25: 501–510.
11.
Jenkins H, Sakurai Y, Nishimura A, Okamoto H, Hibberd M, Jenkins R, Yoneyama T, Ashida K, Ogama Y, Warrington S: Randomised clinical trial: safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of repeated doses of TAK-438 (vonoprazan), a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, in healthy male subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015; 41: 636–648.
12.
Ashida K, Sakurai Y, Nishimura A, Kudou K, Hiramatsu N, Umegaki E, Iwakiri K, Chiba T: Randomised clinical trial: a dose-ranging study of vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, vs. lansoprazole for the treatment of erosive oesophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015; 42: 685–695.
13.
Hoshino S, Kawami N, Takenouchi N, Umezawa M, Hanada Y, Hoshikawa Y, Kawagoe T, Sano H, Hoshihara Y, Nomura T, Iwakiri K: Efficacy of vonoprazan for proton pump inhibitor-resistant reflux esophagitis. Digestion 2017; 95: 1561–1561.
14.
Yamashita H, Kanamori A, Kano C, Hashimura H, Matsumoto K, Tsujimae M, Yoshizaki T, Momose K, Obata D, Eguchi T, Fujita M, Okada A: The effects of switching to vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, on gastric acidity and reflux patterns in patients with erosive esophagitis refractory to proton pump inhibitors. Digestion 2017; 96: 52–59.
15.
Okuyama M, Nakahara K, Iwakura N, Hasegawa T, Oyama M, Inoue A, Ishizu H, Satoh H, Fujiwara Y. Factors associated with potassium-competitive acid blocker non-response in patients with proton pump inhibitor-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. Digestion 2017; 95: 281–287.
16.
Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Armstrong D, Galmiche JP, Johnson F, Hongo M, Richter JE, Spechler SJ, Tytgat GN, Wallin L: Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut 1999; 45: 172–180.
17.
Iwakiri K, Kawami N, Sano H, Tanaka Y, Umezawa M, Kotoyori M, Hoshihara Y, Sakamoto C: Mechanisms of excessive esophageal acid exposure in patients with reflux esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54: 1686–1692.
18.
Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, Kern M, Arndorfer RC, Reece A: Esophageal peristaltic dysfunction in peptic esophagitis. Gastroenterology 1986; 91: 897–904.
19.
Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ: Effect of peristaltic dysfunction on esophageal volume clearance. Gastroenterology 1988; 94: 73–80.
20.
Iwakiri K, Hoshino S, Kawami N: Mechanisms underlying excessive esophageal acid exposure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Esophagus 2017; 14: 221–228.
21.
Iwakiri K, Sugiura T, Hayashi Y, Kotoyori M, Kawakami A, Makino H, Nomura T, Miyashita M, Takubo K, Sakamoto C: Esophageal motility in Japanese patients with Barrett’s esophagus. J Gastroenterol 2003; 38: 1036–1041.
22.
Sugiura T, Iwakiri K, Kotoyori M, Kobayashi M: Relationship between severity of reflux esophagitis according to the Los Angeles classification and esophageal motility. J Gastroenterol 2001; 36: 226–230.
23.
Sjöstedt S, Befrits R, Sylvan A, Harthon C, Jörgensen L, Carling L, Modin S, Stubberöd A, Toth E, Lind T: Daily treatment with esomeprazole is superior to that taken on-demand for maintenance of healed erosive oesophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 22: 183–191.
24.
Ashida K, Sakurai Y, Hori T, Kudou K, Nishimura A, Hiramatsu N, Umegaki E, Iwakiri K: Randomised clinical trial: vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, vs. lansoprazole for the healing of erosive oesophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2016; 43: 240–251.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.