Background: Although needle knife precut papillotomy and needle knife fistulotomy have been considered useful alternatives for achieving selective biliary cannulation, controversies remain regarding the technical proficiency for performing this procedure and safety concerns. Aim: This retrospective study evaluates the feasibility and safety of combining needle knife precut papillotomy and fistulotomy (NKPPF) to assist endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for difficult biliary cannulation. Methods: Data were collected and analyzed for 48 patients who underwent NKPPF between January 2008 and September 2012 at our center. The operation success rate, mean procedure time, and post-ERCP complications were investigated and compared with those of standard cannulation. Results: The success rate for NKPPF was 96% (46/48) and the mean procedure time was 4.5 ± 1.6 min based on our data set. The major complications included pancreatitis, which occurred in 2 of the 48 patients (4%), and acute cholangitis, which was observed in 1 patient (2%). There was no significant difference between the complication rate of NKPPF (6%) and standard cannulation therapeutic ERCP (4%). Conclusion: NKPPF is an effective method for accessing the biliary system after failed standard cannulation and is not associated with an increased risk of complications.

Journal Section:
Original Paper
Keywords:
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Needle knife, Precut papillotomy, Fistulotomy
1.
Ong WC, Santosh D, Lakhtakia S, et al: A randomized controlled trial on use of propofol alone versus propofol with midazolam, ketamine, and pentazocine ‘sedato-analgesic cocktail' for sedation during ERCP. Endoscopy 2007;39:807-812.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1055%2Fs-2007-966725
2.
Schilling D, Rosenbaun A, Schweizer S, et al: Sedation with propofol for interventional endoscopy by trained nurses in high risk octogenarians: a prospect randomized controlled study. Endoscopy 2009;41:295-298.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1055%2Fs-0028-1119671
3.
Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al: Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37:383-393.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1016%2FS0016-5107%2891%2970740-2
4.
Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM, et al: Can early precut implementation reduce endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complication risk? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy 2010;42:381-388.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1055%2Fs-0029-1243992
5.
Goff JS: Common bile duct pre-cut sphincterotomy: transpancreatic sphincter approach. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;41:502-505.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1016%2FS0016-5107%2805%2980011-2
6.
Weber A, Roesch T, Pointner S, et al: Transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy for cannulation of inaccessible common bile duct: a safe and successful technique. Pancreas 2008;36:187-191.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1097%2FMPA.0b013e31815ac54c
7.
Freeman ML, Guda NM: ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:112-125.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1016%2FS0016-5107%2804%2902463-0
8.
Donnellan F, Zeb F, Courtney G, et al: Suprapapillary needleknife fistulotomy: a safe and effective method for accessing the biliary system. Surg Endosc 2010;24:1937-1940.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs00464-010-0881-9
9.
Tae HL, Byoung WB, Sang HP, et al: Precut fistulotomy for difficult biliary cannulation: is it a risky preference in relation to the experience of an endoscopist? Dig Dis Sci 2011;56:1896-1903.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10620-010-1483-z
10.
Hirotoshi F, Hirofumi K, Ryo H, et al: Quantitative assessment of technical proficiency in performing needle-knife precut papillotomy. Surg Endosc 2009;23:2066-2072.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs00464-008-9969-x
11.
Sriram PV, Rao GV, Nageshwar Reddy D: The precut - when, where and how? A review. Endoscopy 2003;35:S24-S30.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1055%2Fs-2003-41528
12.
Tang SJ, Haber GB, Kortan P, et al: Precut papillotomy versus persistence in difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy 2005;37:58-65.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1055%2Fs-2004-826077
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2013
You do not currently have access to this content.