High-fidelity simulation uses simulators that combine all of the physiological and pharmacological responses of a human in a manikin. These simulators change and respond to the users and trainees. Using simulators for teaching sedation in the field of gastroenterology unifies all the advantages of manikins. To understand the pharmacological and pharmacodynamical principles of drugs used for sedation in different clinical scenarios, such as cardiopulmonary diseases, a high-fidelity simulator is extremely useful. Respiratory complications and airway problems are the main side effects when using sedatives. To overcome these problems, exercise of precautionary measures are highly demanded to avoid hazards. High-fidelity simulation is increasingly being used for the development of crisis resource management. There are still limitations in using simulators for education and training. At present, applying simulation for teaching is expensive. The start-up costs and the expenses for instructors and technicians are high. Moreover, no direct evidence has demonstrated that simulation training improves actual patient safety outcome and, therefore, a lot of research in this field remains to be done. Even so, confidence is growing in the validity of medical simulation as the training tool of the future.

1.
Society for Simulation in Health Care. http://ssih.org.
2.
Grevnik A, Schaefer J: From Resusci-Anne to Sim Man: the evolution of simulators in medicine. Crit Care Med 2004;32(suppl 2):S56–S57.
3.
Denson J, Abrahamson S: A computer-controlled patient simulator. JAMA 1969;208:504–508.
[PubMed]
4.
METI Web site. www.meti.com/products.
5.
Scalese RJ, Obeso VT, Issenberg SB: Simulation technology for skills training and competency assessment in medical education. J Gen Intern Med 2007;23:46–49.
6.
American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists: Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 2002;96:1004–1017.
[PubMed]
7.
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:317–322.
[PubMed]
8.
Radaelli F, Meucci G, Sgroi G, et al: Technical performance of colonoscopy: the key role of sedation/analgesia and other quality indicators. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:1122–1130.
[PubMed]
9.
Rex DK, Heuss LT, Walker JA, et al: Trained registered nurses/endoscopy teams can administer propofol safely for endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2005;129:1384–1391.
[PubMed]
10.
Cohen LB, Dubovsky AN, Aisenberg J, et al: Propofol for endoscopic sedation: a protocol for safe and effective administration by the gastroenterologist. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:725–732.
[PubMed]
11.
Vargo JJ, Holub JL, Faigel Do, et al: Risk factors for cardiopulmonary events during propofol-mediated upper endoscopy and colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;24:955–963.
[PubMed]
12.
Patel S, Vargo JJ, Khandwala F, et al: Deep sedation occurs frequently during elective endoscopy with meperidine and midazolam. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:2689–2695.
[PubMed]
13.
Koch Ad, Buzink SN, Heemskerk J, et al: Expert and construct validity of the Simbionix GI Mentor II endoscopy simulator for colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 2008;22:158–162.
[PubMed]
14.
Kiesslich R, Moenk S, Reinhardt K, et al: Combined simulation training: a new concept and workshop is useful for crisis management in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Z Gastroenterol 2005;43:1031–1039.
[PubMed]
15.
DeMaria S, Levine AI, Cohen LB: Human patient simulation and its role in endoscopic sedation training. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2008;18:801–813.
[PubMed]
16.
Knudson MM, Khaw L, Bullard K, et al: Trauma training in simulation: translating skills from Sim to real time. J Trauma 2008;64:255–264.
[PubMed]
You do not currently have access to this content.