Background/Aim: Data on informed consent procedures in endoscopy centers in China are lacking. The aim of this study was to record the current status of informed consent procedures in four tertiary endoscopy centers in China. Methods: All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examinations in four tertiary endoscopy centers in China from August 2006 to October 2006. Data on patients’ age, gender, education level, type of endoscopic procedures, complication rates, and satisfaction were recorded prospectively. Results: Totally, 1,303 patients were included (mean age 47.7 years, 50.2% males, 88.3% outpatients, 13.1% with university education) and underwent 1,308 endoscopic procedures. Of these patients, 994 were informed prior to the endoscopic procedures; the remaining patients were not asked for their oral or written informed consent before the procedure. No serious complications occurred, but 9 patients were not satisfied with the procedures and 5 patients refused to complete the endoscopic examination. Conclusions: Gastrointestinal endoscopic examinations, especially diagnostic gastroscopy, are safe, carrying minimal patient risk, but the current practice of informed consent procedures in China is suboptimal. More efforts should be made to improve the standards of informed consent for endoscopic procedures in China.

Journal Section:
Original Paper
Keywords:
Informed consent, GI endoscopy, Gastrointestinal endoscopy, Gastroscopy
1.
Kondziolka DS, Pirris SM, Lunsford LD: Improving the informed consent process for surgery. Neurosurgery 2006;58:1184–1189.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1227%2F01.NEU.0000215958.26175.EA
2.
Stanciu C, Novis B, Ladas S, Sommerville A, Zabovowski P, Isaacs P, Papatheodoridis G, James T: Recommendations of the ESGE Workshop on Informed Consent for Digestive Endoscopy. First European Symposium on Ethics in Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Kos, Greece, June 2003. Endoscopy 2003;35:772–774.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1055%2Fs-2003-41590
3.
Levine RJ: Informed consent: some challenges to the universal validity of the Western model. Law Med Health Care 1991;19:207–213.
[PubMed]
4.
Levine EG, Brandt LJ, Plumeri P: Informed consent: a survey of physician outcomes and practices. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;41:448–452.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1016%2FS0016-5107%2805%2980002-1
5.
Vila JJ, Jimenez FJ, Inarrairaegui M, Prieto C, Nantes O, Borda F: Informed consent document in gastrointestinal endoscopy: understanding and acceptance by patients. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2006;98:101–111.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.4321%2FS1130-01082006000200005
6.
Shepherd HA, Bowman D, Hancock B, Anglin J, Hewett D: Postal consent for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gut 2000;46:37–39.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1136%2Fgut.46.1.37
7.
Thornton RG: Informed consent. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2000;13:187–190.
8.
Skene L, Smallwood R: Informed consent: lessons from Australia. BMJ 2002;324:39–41.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1136%2Fbmj.324.7328.39
9.
British Society of Gastroenterology: Guidelines for Informed Consent for Endoscopic Procedures. Guidelines in Gastroenterology 11. London, British Society of Gastroenterology, 1999.
10.
Ladas SD: Informed consent: still far from ideal? Digestion 2006;73:187–188.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1159%2F000094527
11.
Woodrow SR, Jenkins AP: How thorough is the process of informed consent prior to outpatient gastroscopy? A study of practice in a United Kingdom District Hospital. Digestion 2006;73:189–197.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1159%2F000094528
12.
Mayberry MK, Mayberry JF: Towards better informed consent in endoscopy: a study of information and consent processes in gastroscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001;13:1467–1476.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1097%2F00042737-200112000-00010
13.
Thuraisingam AI: Survey of informed consent for endoscopy. Gut 2001;49:874.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1136%2Fgut.49.6.874
14.
Parmar VN, Mayberry JF: An audit of informed consent in gastroscopy: investigation of a hospital’s informed consent procedure in endoscopy by assessing current practice. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;17:721–724.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1097%2F00042737-200507000-00005
15.
Gerstenberger P, Plumeri P: Malpractice claims in gastrointestinal endoscopy: analysis of an insurance industry data base. Gastrointest Endosc 1993;39:132–138.
[PubMed]
16.
Quine MA, Bell GD, McCloy RF, Matthews HR: Prospective audit of perforation rates following upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England. Br J Surg 1995;82:530–533.
[PubMed]
https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fbjs.1800820430
17.
Reference Guide to Consent for Examination or Treatment. London, Department of Health, 2001.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2007
You do not currently have access to this content.