Colonoscopy has been established as a screening tool for colorectal cancer and precursors in some countries. Efforts to improve instrument performance as well as patient comfort, safety and compliance have led to modifications of existing endoscopes as well as to the development of new scopes with different working mechanisms, including the colon capsule. While the former have not substantially changed performance, the true value of new scopes – partially single use and/or self propelling – can not be fully assessed, since they are either still under development and/or tested only in animals and in small groups of patients or volunteers. The colon capsule holds promise but has a too complicated preparatory regimen and too low a sensitivity at the moment. Future developments and further studies will show which of these techniques may complement or even replace traditional screening colonoscopy.

1.
Pox C, Schmiegel W, Classen M: Current status of screening colonoscopy in Europe and in the United States. Endoscopy 2007;39:168–173.
[PubMed]
2.
Winawer SJ; NPS investigators: The achievements, impact, and future of the National Polyp Study. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;64:975–978.
[PubMed]
3.
Lau P, Sung J: Screening for colorectal cancer. Chin J Dig Dis 2004;5:87–92.
4.
Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, Bond J, Burt R, Ferrucci J, Ganiats T, Levin T, Woolf S, Johnson D, Kirk L, Litin S, Simmang C: Gastrointestinal Consortium Panel. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale – update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003;124:544–560.
[PubMed]
5.
Lieberman DA: Cost-effectiveness model for colon cancer screening. Gastroenterology 1995;109:1781–1790.
[PubMed]
6.
Altenhofen L, Knoepnadel J, Schmiegel W, Brenner G, Classen M: Acceptance and findings of the first nationwide screening colonoscopy round in Germany (abstract). Gastroenterology 2005;128:A96.
7.
Gili M, Roca M, Ferrer V, Obrador A, Cabeza E: Psychosocial factors associated with the adherence to a colorectal cancer screening program. Cancer Detect Prev 2006;30:354–360.
[PubMed]
8.
Bleiker EM, Menko FH, Taal BG, Kluijt I, Wever LD, Gerritsma MA, Vasen HF, Aaronson NK: Screening behavior of individuals at high risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2005;128:280–287.
[PubMed]
9.
Nicholson FB, Korman MG: Acceptance of flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy for screening and surveillance in colorectal cancer prevention. J Med Screen 2005;12:89–95.
[PubMed]
10.
Nicholson FB, Barro JL, Atkin W, Lilford R, Patnick J, Williams CB, Pignone M, Steele R, Kamm MA: Review article: population screening for colorectal cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005;22:1069–1077.
[PubMed]
11.
Wee CC, McCarthy EP, Phillips RS: Factors associated with colon cancer screening: the role of patient factors and physician counseling. Prev Med 2005;41:23–29.
[PubMed]
12.
Seeff LC, Nadel MR, Klabunde CN, Thompson T, Shapiro JA, Vernon SW, Coates RJ: Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult US population. Cancer 2004;100:2093–2103.
[PubMed]
13.
Bader L, Blumenstock G, Birkner B, Leiss O, Heesemann J, Riemann JF, Selbmann HK: HYGEA (Hygiene in gastroenterology – endoscope reprocessing): study on quality of reprocessing flexible endoscopes in hospitals and in the practice setting (in German). Z Gastroenterol 2002;40:157–170.
[PubMed]
14.
Birkner BR, Selbman HK, Kleff S, Munte A: Mandatory hygiene control as a key of decreasing failures of endoscopic reprocessing in ambulatory care (abstract). Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59:P118.
15.
Nelson DB, Muscarella LF: Current issues in endoscope reprocessing and infection control during gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:3953–3964.
[PubMed]
16.
Burdick JS, Hambrick D: Endoscope reprocessing and repair costs. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2004;14:717–724.
[PubMed]
17.
Vader JP, Wietlisbach V, Harris JK, Burnand B, Froehlich F, Gonvers JJ: Gastroenterologists overestimate the appropriateness of colonoscopies they perform: an international observational study. Endoscopy 2005;37:840–846.
[PubMed]
18.
Thomas-Gibson S, Rogers PA, Suzuki N, Vance ME, Rutter MD, Swain D, Nicholls AJ, Saunders BP, Atkin W: Development of a video assessment scoring method to determine the accuracy of endoscopist performance at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Endoscopy 2006;38:218–225.
[PubMed]
19.
Cheung HY, Chung CC, Kwok SY, Tsang WW, Li MK: Improvement in colonoscopy performance with adjunctive magnetic endoscope imaging: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2006;38:214–217.
[PubMed]
20.
Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, Clark DW, Helper DJ, Lehman GA, Mark DG: Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997;112:24–28.
[PubMed]
21.
Bensen S, Mott LA, Dain B, Rothstein R, Baron J: The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps. Polyp Prevention Study Group. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:194–199.
[PubMed]
22.
van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E: Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:343–350.
[PubMed]
23.
Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR: Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:352–359.
[PubMed]
24.
Arnesen RB, Adamsen S, Svendsen LB, Raaschou HO, von Benzon E, Hansen OH: Missed lesions and false-positive findings on computed-tomographic colonography: a controlled prospective analysis. Endoscopy 2005;37:937–944.
[PubMed]
25.
Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, Rothwell DM, Vinden C, Rabeneck L: Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2007;132:96–102.
[PubMed]
26.
Pabby A, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, Burt R, Kikendall JW, Lance P, Shike M, Lanza E, Schatzkin A: Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:385–391.
[PubMed]
27.
Thomas-Gibson S, Rogers P, Cooper S, Man R, Rutter MD, Suzuki N, Swain D, Thuraisingam A, Atkin W: Judgement of the quality of bowel preparation at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is associated with variability in adenoma detection rates. Endoscopy 2006;38:456–460.
[PubMed]
28.
Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RL: Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2533–2541.
[PubMed]
29.
Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, Hoffman B, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Petersen BT, Safdi MA, Faigel DO, Pike IM; ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy: Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:873–885.
[PubMed]
30.
Bowles CJ, Leicester R, Romaya C, Swarbrick E, Williams CB, Epstein O: A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut 2004;53:277–283.
[PubMed]
31.
Altenhofen L, Knoepnadel J, Schmiegel W, Brenner G, Classen M: Acceptance and findings of the first nationwide screening colonoscopy round in Germany (abstract). Gastroenterology 2005;128:A96.
32.
Heldwein W, Birkner B, Strauch L, Konig A: Quality assurance in coloscopy in private practice and the hospital. The Gastroenterology Quality Circle (GEQC) Munich (in German). Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1996;121:1040–1045.
[PubMed]
33.
Cotton PB, Connor P, McGee D, Jowell P, Nickl N, Schutz S, Leung J, Lee J, Libby E: Colonoscopy: practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:352–357.
[PubMed]
34.
Fasoli R, Repaci G, Comin U, Minoli G; Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists: A multi-centre North Italian prospective survey on some quality parameters in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 2002;34:833–841.
[PubMed]
35.
Minoli G, Meucci G, Prada A, Terruzzi V, Bortoli A, Gullotta R, Rocca F, Lesinigo E, Curzio M: Quality assurance and colonoscopy. Endoscopy 1999;31:522–527.
[PubMed]
36.
Rex DK, Khalfan HK: Sedation and the technical performance of colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2005;15:661–672.
[PubMed]
37.
Baumann UA: Water intubation of the sigmoid colon: water instillation speeds up left-sided colonoscopy. Endoscopy 1999;31:314–317.
[PubMed]
38.
Brocchi E, Pezzilli R, Bonora M, Tomassetti P, Romanelli M, Corinaldesi R: Oil-lubricated colonoscopy: easier and less painful? Endoscopy 2005;37:340–345.
[PubMed]
39.
Shah SG, Brooker JC, Williams CB, Thapar C, Saunders BP: Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on colonoscopy performance: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000;356:1718–1722.
[PubMed]
40.
Cheung HY, Chung CC, Kwok SY, Tsang WW, Li MK: Improvement in colonoscopy performance with adjunctive magnetic endoscope imaging: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2006;38:214–217.
[PubMed]
41.
Brooker JC, Saunders BP, Shah SG, Williams CB: A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2000;46:801–805.
[PubMed]
42.
Yoshikawa I, Honda H, Nagata K, Kanda K, Yamasaki T, Kume K, Tabaru A, Otsuki M: Variable stiffness colonoscopes are associated with less pain during colonoscopy in unsedated patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:3052–3055.
[PubMed]
43.
Al-Shurieki SH, Marshall JB: Is the variable-stiffness paediatric colonoscope more effective than a standard adult colonoscope for outpatient adult colonoscopy? A randomised controlled trial. Dig Liver Dis 2005;37:698–704.
[PubMed]
44.
Lee DW, Li AC, Ko CW, Chu DW, Chan KC, Poon CM, Sin KS, Leung KF, Sze TS, Chan AC, Chung SC: Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope decreases the dose of patient-controlled sedation during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison of 3 colonoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;65:424–429.
[PubMed]
45.
Hoff G, Bretthauer M, Huppertz-Hauss G, Sauar J, Paulsen J, Dahler S, Kjellevold O: Evaluation of a novel colonoscope designed for easier passage through flexures: a randomized study. Endoscopy 2005;37:1123–1126.
[PubMed]
46.
Lee YT, Hui AJ, Wong VW, Hung LC, Sung JJ: Improved colonoscopy success rate with a distally attached mucosectomy cap. Endoscopy 2006;38:739–742.
[PubMed]
47.
Kondo S, Yamaji Y, Watabe H, Yamada A, Sugimoto T, Ohta M, Ogura K, Okamoto M, Yoshida H, Kawabe T, Omata M: A randomized controlled trial evaluating the usefulness of a transparent hood attached to the tip of the colonoscope. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:75–81.
[PubMed]
48.
Deenadayalu VP, Chadalawada V, Rex DK: 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:2138–2142.
[PubMed]
49.
Lapalus MG, Helbert T, Napoleon B, Rey JF, Houcke P, Ponchon T; Societe Francaise d’Endoscopie Digestive: Does chromoendoscopy with structure enhancement improve the colonoscopic adenoma detection rate? Endoscopy 2006;38:444–448.
[PubMed]
50.
Le Rhun M, Coron E, Parlier D, Nguyen JM, Canard JM, Alamdari A, Sautereau D, Chaussade S, Galmiche JP: High resolution colonoscopy with chromoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for the detection of colonic neoplasia: a randomized study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:349–354.
[PubMed]
51.
Rex DK, Helbig CC: High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology 2007;133:42–47.
[PubMed]
52.
Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS, Abou-Rebyeh H, Schachschal G, Veltzke-Schlieker W, Khalifa AC, Setka E, Koch M, Wiedenmann B, Rosch T: A prospective randomized study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does NBI induce a learning effect? Gut 2007; Epub ahead of print.
53.
Kiesslich R, Fritsch J, Holtmann M, Koehler HH, Stolte M, Kanzler S, Nafe B, Jung M, Galle PR, Neurath MF: Methylene blue-aided chromoendoscopy for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia and colon cancer in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2003;124:880–888.
[PubMed]
54.
Dekker E, van den Broek FJ, Reitsma JB, Hardwick JC, Offerhaus GJ, van Deventer SJ, Hommes DW, Fockens P: Narrow-band imaging compared with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of dysplasia in patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis. Endoscopy 2007;39:216–221.
[PubMed]
55.
Matsumoto T, Moriyama T, Yao T, Mibu R, Iida M: Autofluorescence imaging colonoscopy for the diagnosis of dysplasia in ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007;13:640–641.
[PubMed]
56.
Eickhoff A, Jakobs R, Kamal A, Mermash S, Riemann JF, van Dam J: In vitro evaluation of forces exerted by a new computer-assisted colonoscope (the NeoGuide Endoscopy System). Endoscopy 2006;38:1224–1229.
[PubMed]
57.
Eickhoff A, Van Dam J, Jakobs R, Kudis V, Hartmann D, Damian U, Weickert U, Schilling D, Riemann JF: Computer-assisted colonoscopy (The NeoGuide Endoscopy System): results of the first human clinical trial (‘PACE Study’). Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:261–266.
[PubMed]
58.
Long G, Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse CA, Mills T, Swain P: The Cath-Cam: a new concept in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;64:997–1001.
[PubMed]
59.
Fritscher-Ravens A, Fox S, Swain CP, Milla P, Long G: CathCam guide wire-directed colonoscopy: first pilot study in patients with a previous incomplete colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2006;38:209–213.
[PubMed]
60.
Pfeffer J, Grinshpon R, Rex D, Levin B, Rösch T, Arber N, Halpern Z: The Aer-O-Scope: proof of the concept of a pneumatic, skill-independent, self-propelling, self-navigating colonoscope in a pig model. Endoscopy 2006;38:144–148.
[PubMed]
61.
Vucelic B, Rex D, Pulanic R, Pfefer J, Hrstic I, Levin B, Halpern Z, Arber N: The Aer-O-Scope: proof of concept of a pneumatic, skill-independent, self-propelling, self-navigating colonoscope. Gastroenterology 2006;130:672–677.
[PubMed]
62.
Arber N, Grinshpon R, Maor L, Pfeffer J, Bar-Meir S, Rex D: Proof of concept study of the Aer-O-Scope™ omni-directional colonoscopic viewing system in ex-vivo and in-vivo porcine models. Endoscopy 2007;39:412–417.
[PubMed]
63.
Rosch T, Adler A, Wiedenmann B, Hoepffner N: A prospective pilot study to assess technical performance of a new single use colonoscope with inverted sleeve technology (abstract). Gastrointest Endosc 2007;65:AB340.
64.
Eliakim R, Fireman Z, Gralnek IM, Yassin K, Waterman M, Kopelman Y, Lachter J, Koslowsky B, Adler SN: Evaluation of the PillCam Colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter, prospective, comparative study. Endoscopy 2006;38:963–970.
[PubMed]
65.
Schoofs N, Deviere J, Van Gossum A: PillCam colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy for colorectal tumor diagnosis: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy 2006;38:971–977.
[PubMed]
You do not currently have access to this content.