Background: An increased incidence of Barrett’s esophagus in cases with combined acidic and bile reflux is reported. The volunteers serving as controls in those studies were significantly younger than the patients. The aim of this study was to analyze bile reflux patterns of healthy volunteers aged comparably to patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Subjects and Methods: 19 older (8 f, 11 m; median age 51 years) (OV) and 20 younger (10 f, 10 m; median age 25 years) (YV) healthy volunteers without history of gastrointestinal disease or medication underwent simultaneous 24-hour pH and bile monitoring (Bilitec®). All subjects consumed a special diet that did not interfere with bile measurements. Indicators for bile reflux in the stomach and esophagus: bilirubin probe absorption >0.25 in total measuring period (TM), upright position (excluding postprandial periods) (UP) and supine period (SP). Results: There were no differences between older and younger volunteers in pH monitoring. Comparing the periods of bilirubin exposure of the stomach, the median (lower and upper quartile) percentage of time was OV = 5.7% (1.0–15.0%) and YV = 3.5% (0.1–7.8%) respectively for TM (n.s.), OV = 3.1% (0.7–9.4%) and YV = 0.4% (0.0–7.1%) for UP (n.s.), and OV = 2.1% (0.2–16.7%) and YV = 5.9% (0.0–12.2%) respectively for SP (n.s.). In 10/19 older volunteers and in 18/20 younger volunteers, no reflux of bile into the esophagus was measured. However, 4 older volunteers presented bile reflux from 4.6 to 51% of the total measuring period in contrast to the younger group with a maximum of 1.3% of TM. Conclusion: No significant differences in bile reflux into the stomach were distinguishable between younger and older healthy volunteers, but older volunteers more frequently exhibited bile reflux into the esophagus.

1.
Sato T, Miwa K, Sahara H, et al: The sequential model of Barrett’s esophagus and adenocarcinoma induced by duodeno-esophageal reflux without exogenous carcinogens. Anticancer Res 2002;22:39–44.
[PubMed]
2.
Vaezi MF, Richter JE: Duodenogastroesophageal reflux and methods to monitor nonacidic reflux. Am J Med 2001;111(suppl 8A):160S–168S.
3.
Gutschow CA, Schroder W, Holscher AH: Barrett’s esophagus: What is the poison – alkaline, biliary or acidic reflux? Dis Esophagus 2002;15:5–9.
[PubMed]
4.
Martinez de Haro L, Ortiz A, Parrilla P, et al: Intestinal metaplasia in patients with columnar lined esophagus is associated with high levels of duodenogastroesophageal reflux. Ann Surg 2001;233:34–38.
[PubMed]
5.
Vaezi MF, Richter JE: Role of acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 1996;111:1192–1199.
[PubMed]
6.
Sharma P, Sampliner R: GERD, DGER, or both in Barrett’s esophagus? Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92:903–904.
[PubMed]
7.
Bowrey DJ, Williams GT, Carey PD, et al: Inflammation at the cardio-oesophageal junction: Relationship to acid and bile exposure. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003;15:49–54.
[PubMed]
8.
Becchi P, Cianchi F: Technical aspects and clinical indications of 24-hour intragastric bile monitoring. Hepatogastroenterology 1999;46:54–59.
[PubMed]
9.
Caldwell MT, Byrne PJ, Brazil N, et al: An ambulatory bile reflux monitoring system: An in vitro appraisal. Physiol Meas 1994;15:57–65.
[PubMed]
10.
Vaezi MF, Lacamera RG, Richter JE: Validation studies of Bilitec 2000®: An ambulatory duodenogastric reflux monitoring system. Am J Physiol 1994;267:1050–1057.
11.
Kauer WK, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, et al: Mixed reflux of gastric and duodenal juices is more harmful to the esophagus than gastric juice alone. The need for surgical therapy re-emphasized. Ann Surg 1995;222:525–531.
[PubMed]
12.
Caldwell MT, Lawlor P, Byrne PJ, et al: Ambulatory oesophageal bile reflux monitoring in Barrett’s oesophagus. Br J Surg 1995;82:657–660.
[PubMed]
13.
Champion G, Richter JE, Vaezi MF, et al: Duodenogastroesophageal reflux: Relationship to pH and importance in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 1994;107:747–754.
[PubMed]
14.
Vaezi MF, Richter JE. Fiberoptic sensor for bilirubin. Am J Surg 1995;170:310–312.
[PubMed]
15.
Fein M, Fuchs KH, Bohrer T, et al: Fiberoptic technique for 24-hour bile reflux monitoring. Standards and normal values for gastric monitoring. Dig Dis Sci 1996;41:216–225.
[PubMed]
16.
Byrne JP, Romagnoli R, Bechi P, et al: Duodenogastric reflux of bile in health: The normal range. Physiol Meas 1999;1:149–158.
[PubMed]
17.
Thomas H, Wilhelm L, Petermann J, et al: Simultaneous long-term measurement of duodenogastric reflux and gastroduodenal motility. Chirurg 1997;68:618–623.
[PubMed]
18.
Marshall RE, Anggiansah A, Owen WA, et al: The extent of duodenogastric reflux in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001;13:5–10.
[PubMed]
19.
Tack J, Bisshops R, Koek G, et al: Dietary restrictions during ambulatory monitoring of dudenogastroesophageal reflux. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48:1213–1220.
[PubMed]
20.
Vaezi MF, Richter JE: Role of acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 1996;111:1192–1199.
[PubMed]
21.
Okholm M, Sorensen H, Wallin L, et al: Bile reflux into the esophagus. Bilitec 2000® measurements in normal subjects and in patients after Nissen fundoplication. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999;34:653–657.
[PubMed]
22.
Achem AC, Achem SR, Stark ME, et al: Failure of esophageal peristalsis in older patients: Association with esophageal acid exposure. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:35–39.
[PubMed]
23.
Hölscher AH, Bollschweiler E, Bumm R: pH-Metrie von Oesophagus und Magen; in Classen M, Siewert JR, Blum AL (eds): Aktuelle Gastroenterologische Diagnostik, ed 2. Berlin, Springer, 1992.
You do not currently have access to this content.