Abstract
In 21 unoperated male duodenal ulcer patients, i.v. 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2 DG) produced significantly higher gastric acid responses than i.v. insulin. The acid response appeared earlier with 2 DG than insulin. The dose of 2 DG (50 mg/kg) was probably submaximal and that of insulin (0.2 U/kg) is regarded as maximal for acid secretion in duodenal ulcer patients. The side effects with 2 DG and insulin were similar, appeared in about equal frequency and required no treatment. In all patients, 2 DG increased the blood glucose level. The potential value of 2 DG is for testing the completeness of vagotomy, but the experience with 2 DG in man is still too limited to warrant its use in routine clinical secretory tests.
Journal Section:
Original Paper
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1972 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
1972
You do not currently have access to this content.