Introduction: The virtual scale endoscope (VSE) is a newly introduced endoscope that helps endoscopists in measuring colorectal polyp size (CPS) during colonoscopy by displaying a virtual scale. This study aimed to determine the usefulness of the VSE for CPS measurement and the educational benefit of using VSE images to improve CPS estimation accuracy. Methods: This study included 42 colorectal polyps in 26 patients treated at Hiroshima University Hospital. In study 1, CPS measured using a VSE before endoscopic mucosal resection was compared with CPS measured on resected specimens, and the agreement between the two measurement methods was evaluated via Bland-Altman analysis. In study 2, 14 endoscopists (5 beginners, 5 intermediates, and 4 experts) took a pre-test to determine the size of 42 polyps. After the pre-test, a lecture on CPS measurement using VSE images was given. One month later, the endoscopists took a post-test to compare CPS accuracy before and after the lecture. Results: In study 1, Bland-Altman analysis revealed no fixed or proportional errors. The mean bias ±95% limits of agreement (±1.96 standard deviations) of the measurement error was −0.05 ± 0.21 mm, indicating that the agreement between two measurement methods was sufficient. In study 2, the accuracy of CPS measurement was significantly higher among beginners (59.5% vs. 26.7%, p < 0.01) and intermediates (65.2% vs. 44.3%, p < 0.05) in the post-test than in the pre-test. Conclusion: The VSE accurately measures CPS before resection, and its images are useful teaching tools for beginner and intermediate endoscopists.

1.
Lieberman
DA
,
Rex
DK
,
Winawer
SJ
,
Giardiello
FM
,
Johnson
DA
,
Levin
TR
.
Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer
.
Gastroenterology
.
2012 Sep
143
3
844
57
.
2.
Hassan
C
,
Quintero
E
,
Dumonceau
JM
,
Regula
J
,
Brandão
C
,
Chaussade
S
et al
.
Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline
.
Endoscopy
.
2013 Oct
45
10
842
51
.
3.
Gupta
S
,
Lieberman
D
,
Anderson
JC
,
Burke
CA
,
Dominitz
JA
,
Kaltenbach
T
et al
.
Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer
.
Gastroenterology
.
2020 Mar
158
4
1131
53.e5
.
4.
Vleugels
J
,
Dekker
E
.
Does polyp size matter
.
Endosc Int Open
.
2017 Aug
5
8
E746
8
.
5.
Ninomiya
Y
,
Oka
S
,
Tanaka
S
,
Boda
K
,
Yamashita
K
,
Sumimoto
K
et al
.
Clinical impact of surveillance colonoscopy using magnification without diminutive polyp removal
.
Dig Endosc
.
2017 Nov
29
7
773
81
.
6.
Uraoka
T
,
Oka
S
,
Ichihara
S
,
Iwatate
M
,
Tamai
N
,
Kawamura
T
et al
.
Endoscopic management of colorectal tumors less than 10 mm in size: current status and future perspectives in Japan from a questionnaire survey
.
Dig Endosc
.
2018 Apr
30
Suppl 1
36
40
.
7.
Chang
CY
,
Chiu
HM
,
Wang
HP
,
Lee
CT
,
Tai
JJ
,
Tu
CH
et al
.
An endoscopic training model to improve accuracy of colonic polyp size measurement
.
Int J Colorectal Dis
.
2010 May
25
5
655
60
.
8.
Shamsi
N
,
Shaukat
A
,
Halperin-Goldstein
S
,
Colton
J
.
Sizing of polyp illustrations differs by endoscopists’ gender and improves with a measurement reference
.
Eval Health Prof
.
2020 Dec
43
4
270
3
.
9.
Eichenseer
PJ
,
Dhanekula
R
,
Jakate
S
,
Mobarhan
S
,
Melson
JE
.
Endoscopic mis-sizing of polyps changes colorectal cancer surveillance recommendations
.
Dis Colon Rectum
.
2013 Mar
56
3
315
21
.
10.
Anderson
BW
,
Smyrk
TC
,
Anderson
KS
,
Mahoney
DW
,
Devens
ME
,
Sweetser
SR
et al
.
Endoscopic overestimation of colorectal polyp size
.
Gastrointest Endosc
.
2016 Jan
83
1
201
8
.
11.
Utsumi
T
,
Horimatsu
T
,
Nishikawa
Y
,
Teramoto
A
,
Hirata
D
,
Iwatate
M
et al
.
Factors associated with inaccurate size estimation of colorectal polyps: a multicenter cross-sectional study
.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol
.
2021 Aug
36
8
2224
9
.
12.
Atalaia-Martins
C
,
Marcos
P
,
Leal
C
,
Barbeiro
S
,
Fernandes
A
,
Santos
A
et al
.
Variation between pathological measurement and endoscopically estimated size of colonic polyps
.
GE Port J Gastroenterol
.
2019 May
26
3
163
8
.
13.
Sakata
S
,
McIvor
F
,
Klein
K
,
Stevenson
ARL
,
Hewett
DG
.
Measurement of polyp size at colonoscopy: a proof-of-concept simulation study to address technology bias
.
Gut
.
2018 Feb
67
2
206
8
.
14.
Hyun
YS
,
Han
DS
,
Bae
JH
,
Park
HS
,
Eun
CS
.
Graduated injection needles and snares for polypectomy are useful for measuring colorectal polyp size
.
Dig Liver Dis
.
2011 May
43
5
391
4
.
15.
Kaz
AM
,
Anwar
A
,
O’Neill
DR
,
Dominitz
JA
.
Use of a novel polyp “ruler snare” improves estimation of colon polyp size
.
Gastrointest Endosc
.
2016 Apr
83
4
812
6
.
16.
Watanabe
T
,
Kume
K
,
Yoshikawa
I
,
Harada
M
.
Usefulness of a novel calibrated hood to determine indications for colon polypectomy: visual estimation of polyp size is not accurate
.
Int J Colorectal Dis
.
2015 Jul
30
7
933
8
.
17.
Goldstein
O
,
Segol
O
,
Gross
SA
,
Jacob
H
,
Siersema
PD
.
Novel device for measuring polyp size: an ex vivo animal study
.
Gut
.
2018 Oct
67
10
1755
6
.
18.
Morales
TG
,
Sampliner
RE
,
Garewal
HS
,
Fennerty
MB
,
Aickin
M
.
The difference in colon polyp size before and after removal
.
Gastrointest Endosc
.
1996 Jan
43
1
25
8
.
19.
Rex
DK
,
Rabinovitz
R
.
Variable interpretation of polyp size by using open forceps by experienced colonoscopists
.
Gastrointest Endosc
.
2014 Mar
79
3
402
7
.
20.
Gopalswamy
N
,
Shenoy
VN
,
Choudhry
U
,
Markert
RJ
,
Peace
N
,
Bhutani
MS
et al
.
Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate
.
Gastrointest Endosc
.
1997 Dec
46
6
497
502
.
21.
Yoshioka
M
,
Sakaguchi
Y
,
Utsunomiya
D
,
Sonoda
S
,
Tatsuta
T
,
Ozawa
S
et al
.
Virtual scale function of gastrointestinal endoscopy for accurate polyp size estimation in real-time: a preliminary study
.
J Biomed Opt
.
2021 Sep
26
9
096002
.
22.
Shimoda
R
,
Akutagawa
T
,
Tomonaga
M
,
Murano
T
,
Shinmura
K
,
Yoshioka
M
et al
.
Estimating colorectal polyp size with a virtual scale endoscope and visual estimation during colonoscopy: prospective, preliminary comparison of accuracy
.
Dig Endosc
.
2022 Nov
34
7
1471
7
.
23.
Hewett
DG
.
Measurement of polyp size at colonoscopy: addressing human and technology bias
.
Dig Endosc
.
2022 Nov
34
7
1478
80
.
24.
Utsumi
T
,
Horimatsu
T
,
Nishikawa
Y
,
Teramoto
A
,
Hirata
D
,
Iwatate
M
et al
.
Short educational video to improve the accuracy of colorectal polyp size estimation: multicenter prospective study
.
Dig Endosc
.
2020 Nov
32
7
1074
81
.
25.
Giavarina
D
.
Understanding bland altman analysis
.
Biochem Med
.
2015
;
25
(
2
):
141
51
.
26.
Rubio
CA
,
Höög
CM
,
Broström
O
,
Gustavsson
J
,
Karlsson
M
,
Moritz
P
et al
.
Assessing the size of polyp phantoms in tandem colonoscopies
.
Anticancer Res
.
2009 May
29
5
1539
45
.
27.
Chaptini
L
,
Chaaya
A
,
Depalma
F
,
Hunter
K
,
Peikin
S
,
Laine
L
.
Variation in polyp size estimation among endoscopists and impact on surveillance intervals
.
Gastrointest Endosc
.
2014 Oct
80
4
652
9
.
28.
Schoen
RE
,
Gerber
LD
,
Margulies
C
.
The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate
.
Gastrointest Endosc
.
1997 Dec
46
6
492
6
.
29.
Altman
DG
,
Bland
JM
.
Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies
.
Statistician
.
1983 Sep
32
3
307
17
.
30.
Beukema
KR
,
Simmering
JA
,
Brusse-Keizer
M
,
John
S
,
Quispel
R
,
Mensink
PB
.
Factors influencing endoscopic estimation of colon polyp size in a colon model
.
Clin Endosc
.
2022 Jul
55
4
540
8
.
You do not currently have access to this content.