Background/Aims: Recently, postendoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) has attracted attention. However, the criteria for computed tomography (CT) scanning following esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are unclear. In this study, we aimed to identify the predictive factors of PEECS and the usefulness of CT scanning after esophageal ESD. Methods: A total of 245 lesions in 223 patients who underwent esophageal ESD between February 2008 and October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with double cancers, those who experienced procedural accidents, such as aspiration pneumonitis or perforation, and those who were unable to undergo CT were excluded from the study. PEECS evaluation items included body temperature (≤37.7°C = 1 point, ≥37.8°C = 2 points), white blood cell count (<10,800/μL = 1 point, ≥10,800/μL = 2 points), and chest pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] ≤4 = 1 point, NRS ≥5 = 2 points). Scores of ≥5 points were categorized as the PEECS-positive group, and scores of ≤4 points were categorized as the PEECS-negative group. The degree of mediastinal emphysema on CT was stratified into 5 grades, in which grades 0 and 1 were considered as the “low-grade” group, and grades 2, 3, and 4 were considered as the “high-grade” group. We analyzed the prognostic factors of high-grade mediastinal emphysema, including the presence or absence of PEECS. Results: The PEECS-positive group comprised 18 out of the 163 patients (11.0%), and mediastinal emphysema was stratified into grades 0 (94), 1 (51), 2 (12), 3 (5), and 4 (1 patient). Three independent risk factors for the onset of PEECS were identified, as follows: resected area ≥750 mm2 (OR 7.28, 95% CI 1.42–37.33, p = 0.017), treatment duration ≥75 min (OR 10.26, 95% CI 1.20–87.77, p = 0.034), and muscle layer exposure (OR 10.92, 95% CI 2.22–53.74, p = 0.003). Two independent predictive factors of high-grade mediastinal emphysema were identified, which were PEECS positivity (OR 4.31, 95% CI 1.29–14.41, p = 0.018), and muscle layer exposure (OR 4.08, 95% CI 1.18–14.06, p = 0.026). Conclusions: A large resected area, prolonged treatment duration, and muscle layer exposure are risk factors for the onset of PEECS. Mediastinal emphysema was observed in 43% of patients following ESD. When marked clinical symptoms of PEECS appear, high-grade mediastinal emphysema may be observed, and therefore CT should be performed in these cases.

1.
Das A, Singh V, Fleischer DE, Sharma VK. A comparison of endoscopic treatment and surgery in early esophageal cancer: an analysis of surveillance epidemiology and end results data. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jun;103(6):1340–5.
2.
Fujishiro M. Perspective on the practical indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jul;14(27):4289–95.
3.
Nagami Y, Ominami M, Otani K, Hosomi S, Tanaka F, Taira K, et al. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagogastric Junction. Digestion. 2018;97(1):38–44.
4.
Tsujii Y, Nishida T, Nishiyama O, Yamamoto K, Kawai N, Yamaguchi S, et al. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Endoscopy. 2015 Sep;47(9):775–83.
5.
Hirasawa K, Kokawa A, Oka H, Yahara S, Sasaki T, Nozawa A, et al. Superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: long-term results of endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Nov;72(5):960–6.
6.
Fujita I, Toyokawa T, Matsueda K, Omote S, Fujita A, Ueda Y, et al. Association between CT-Diagnosed Pneumonia and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Neoplasms. Digestion. 2016;94(1):37–43.
7.
Toyonaga T, Nishino E, Hirooka T, Dozaiku T, Sugiyama T, Iwata Y, et al. Use of short needle knife for esophgeal endscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc. 2005;17(3):246–52.
8.
Takeuchi M, Kobayashi M, Narisawa R. Management for complications from esophageal ESD. Gastroent Endosc. 2006;48:2005.
9.
Kuroha M, Hirasawa D, Fujita N, et al. ­Mediastinal emphysema in endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal cancer-evaluation with C. Endoscopy. 2007;39:A353.
10.
Maeda Y, Hirasawa D, Fujita N, Suzuki T, Obana T, Sugawara T, et al. Mediastinal emphysema after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: its prevalence and clinical significance. Dig Endosc. 2011 Jul;23(3):221–6.
11.
Waye JD, Lewis BS, Yessayan S. Colonoscopy: a prospective report of complications. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992 Dec;15(4):347–51.
12.
Christie JP, Marrazzo J 3rd. “Mini-perforation” of the colon–not all postpolypectomy perforations require laparotomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991 Feb;34(2):132–5.
13.
Waye JD, Kahn O, Auerbach ME. Complications of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1996 Apr;6(2):343–77.
14.
Lee H, Cheoi KS, Chung H, Park JC, Shin SK, Lee SK, et al. Clinical features and predictive factors of coagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasm. Gastric Cancer. 2012 Jan;15(1):83–90.
15.
Pain: clinical manual for nursing practice Pain: clinical manual for nursing practice Margo McCaffery Alexander Beebe Mosby Yearbook UK £17.25 0 7234 1992 2. Nurs Stand. 1994;9(11):55.
16.
Christie JP, Levin B. Selected papers from the Second International Congress on Colonoscopy and Diseases of the Large Bowel, March 6 to 8, 1980. Gastrointest Endosc. 1981 Aug;27(3):184–7.
17.
Kim ES, Cho KB, Park KS, Lee KI, Jang BK, Chung WJ, et al. Factors predictive of perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colorectal tumors. Endoscopy. 2011 Jul;43(7):573–8.
18.
Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Nakamura M, Kakushima N, Kodashima S, Ono S, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal epithelial neoplasia. Endoscopy. 2006 May;38(5):493–7.
19.
Tamegai Y, Saito Y, Masaki N, Hinohara C, Oshima T, Kogure E, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a safe technique for colorectal tumors. Endoscopy. 2007 May;39(5):418–22.
20.
Jung D, Youn YH, Jahng J, Kim JH, Park H. Risk of electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colon and rectum. Endoscopy. 2013 Sep;45(9):714–7.
21.
Hong MJ, Kim JH, Lee SY, Sung IK, Park HS, Shim CS. Prevalence and clinical features of coagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms. Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Jan;60(1):211–6.
22.
Kobayashi R, Hirasawa K, Sato C, Makazu M, Kaneko H, Ikeda R, et al. Utility of multi-detector computed tomography scans after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):818–26.
23.
Onogi F, Araki H, Ibuka T, Manabe Y, Yamazaki K, Nishiwaki S, et al. “Transmural air leak”: a computed tomographic finding following endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric tumors. Endoscopy. 2010 Jun;42(6):441–7.
24.
Ma DW, Youn YH, Jung DH, Park JJ, Kim JH, Park H. Risk factors of electrocoagulation syndrome after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;24(10):1144–51.
25.
Nivatvongs S. Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy: lessons to learn from an experience with 1576 polyps. Am Surg. 1988 Feb;54(2):61–3.
26.
Yamashina T, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N, Hamada K, Aoi K, Yamasaki Y, et al. Features of electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasm. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Mar;31(3):615–20.
27.
Unruh AM. Gender variations in clinical pain experience. Pain. 1996 May-Jun;65(2-3):123–67.
28.
Greenspan JD, Craft RM, LeResche L, Arendt-Nielsen L, Berkley KJ, Fillingim RB, et al.; Consensus Working Group of the Sex, Gender, and Pain SIG of the IASP. Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: a consensus report. Pain. 2007 Nov;132(suppl 1):S26–45.
29.
Min BH, Chang DK, Kim DU, Kim YH, Rhee PL, Kim JJ, et al. Low frequency of bacteremia after an endoscopic resection for large colorectal tumors in spite of extensive submucosal exposure. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Jul;68(1):105–10.
30.
Lee SP, Sung IK, Kim JH, Lee SY, Park HS, Shim CS, et al. A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic antibiotics in the prevention of electrocoagulation syndrome after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Aug;86(2):349–357.e2.
31.
Takeda T, Nagahara A, Ishizuka K, Okubo S, Haga K, Suzuki M, et al. Improved Visibility of Barrett’s Esophagus with Linked Color Imaging: Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability and Quantitative Analysis. Digestion. 2018;97(2):183–94.
You do not currently have access to this content.