Forty-two patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and 18 elderly healthy controls underwent quantitative EEG (qEEG) and regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF; 133Xe clearance) examinations. Correlations were sought between relative qEEG band powers and percent rCBF values in a posterior temporoparietal region of interest in either hemisphere. Moreover, stepwise discriminant analysis was applied to study the accuracy of the two techniques in differentiating AD from healthy ageing. rCBF and qEEG were correlated with one another, especially in the right hemisphere (p values ranging from <0.001 to <0.01). Significant correlations were found between Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and relative power of both the 2- to 6-Hz and the 6.5- to 12-Hz bands on either side (p < 0.001), and between MMSE and left rCBF (p < 0.005), while the correlation with right rCBF was poorer (p < 0.02). The statistical procedure identified the right values of both examinations for the discriminant analysis. Sensitivity of qEEG and rCBF employed together was 88% and specificity 89%, with a total accuracy of 88.3%. The unrecognized patients (n = 5) were affected by mild AD (4 scoring 3 at the Global Deterioration Scale and 1 scoring 4). qEEG alone showed an accuracy of 77% in the whole group and of 69% in mild AD, and rCBF alone an accuracy of 75% in the whole group and of 71% in mild AD. It is concluded that qEEG and rCBF examinations employed together are accurate tools to differentiate AD from normal ageing, although a lower degree of accuracy is achieved in mildly demented patients.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.