A few epidemiologic studies have dealt with the prevalence of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), including Pick’s disease. The aim of this study was to review the epidemiologic studies of FTLD in western countries and to compare them with those in Japan. A community-based study of early-onset dementia in London revealed that 12% of cases with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) fulfilled the Lund-Manchester criteria in contrast to 34% of cases with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in a sample of 185 cases. The Cambridge Group has recently examined the prevalence of early-onset dementia in a community-based study. Of 108 cases, 15.7% had FTLD and 25% had AD. FTLD included 13 FTD cases, and 2 each with semantic dementia (SD) and nonfluent progressive aphasia (PA). Almost one third of cases with FTLD (29%) had a positive family history. Of our consecutive 330 outpatients with dementia (hospital setting without age limitation), 42 (12.7%) had FTLD and 215 (65.1%) had AD. In our series of patients, 22 FTD, 15 SD and 5 PA cases were identified. There was no family history in all subtypes of FTLD. Epidemiologic studies, both community-based and hospital-based, demonstrate that FTLD is a more common cause of early-onset dementia than previously recognized. Regarding the subtypes of FTLD, in Japan, compared with the data from the UK, FTD is less common, SD may be more common and PA is equally common. The reason for this discrepancy is supposed to be mainly based on the role of heredity.

Keywords:
Alzheimer’s disease, Epidemiology, Frontotemporal dementia, Frontotemporal lobar degeneration
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
2004
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.