Background: Donepezil is indicated for the management of mild to moderate dementia, particularly in Alzheimer's disease. Several studies have described low adherence rates with donepezil. Aim: To examine and measure donepezil adherence, persistence and time to first discontinuation in older New Zealanders. Methods: An inception cohort of 1,999 new users of donepezil, aged 65 years or older, were identified from the Pharmaceutical Collections and National Minimum Dataset from 1 November 2010 to 31 December 2013. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis were used to estimate the cumulative probability and risk of time to first discontinuation of donepezil therapy. Results: The mean age of the cohort was 79.5 ± 6.4 years and included 42.7% females. Adherence was high (89.0%), while the proportion of donepezil dispensings (81.0-32.5%) declined between 6 and 36 months. Persistence between the 1st and 6th dispensing visit decreased by 19.0%, and 11.0% of the total cohort had a gap of 31 days or more. The adjusted risk of time to first discontinuation in the non-adherent group was 2.2 times (95% CI 1.9-2.6) that of the adherent group. Conclusions: The non-adherent new donepezil users, on average, discontinued faster than the adherent group. Time to first discontinuation in this study was higher compared to discontinuation rates observed in clinical trials.

Clinical trials with cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) have shown a short-term benefit in halting the progression of cognitive decline, enhanced ability to carry out activities of daily living and improved behaviour in mild to moderate dementia [1,2,3]. However, there has been minimal evidence supporting long-term use of ChEIs to improve cognition, physical function, challenging behaviours, admission to residential care and mortality [4,5,6].

Donepezil is the only subsidized acetylcholinesterase inhibitor approved for symptomatic management of dementia in Alzheimer's disease in New Zealand since 1 November, 2010 to date by the Pharmaceutical Management Agency (PHARMAC) [7]. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend the use of donepezil for mild to moderate dementia with assessment of cognitive function after the first 6 months [8]. In New Zealand, a psychiatric specialist or general practitioner working with mental health patients has to confirm the dementia diagnosis before treatment is initiated using either the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; a score of 21-26 for mild dementia and of 10-20 for moderate dementia), the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R; scale of 0-100), or, in addition, the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog; scale of 0-70) to indicate the need for treatment [1].

Donepezil discontinuation is calibrated depending on how effective the treatment is in halting cognitive decline [9,10,11]. Older people with dementia commonly experience a significant decline in cognitive function without the use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for the first 6 months [12]. Therefore, reassessing cognitive decline after donepezil initiation for a similar time frame would help determine if treatment was effective and beneficial or needs to be discontinued. The NICE and New Zealand Formulary have recommended discontinuation of donepezil in individuals with dementia who do not benefit from treatment within a 6-month exposure to the medicine and restarting treatment for those with a rapid decline in cognitive function after a trial withdrawal of the medicine [8,12,13]. In some individuals, a rapid decline in plasma levels of donepezil occurs during discontinuation and may not keep pace with the central nervous system readjustment leading to withdrawal symptoms and possible restarting of the treatment [14]. The donepezil starting dose is usually 5 mg daily in the first month and may be increased to 10 mg with caution, monitoring for dose-dependent adverse effects [15,16].

The trend and characteristics of donepezil in new users (with no pre-exposure) and beyond 6 months have not been explored in New Zealand so far. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine adherence, persistence and time to first discontinuation (TTFD) of donepezil in an inception cohort of new users over a 3-year follow-up period.

Study Design

An inception cohort of 1,999 de-identified new users of donepezil, who were aged 65 years or older, was followed for 3 years from 1 November 2010 (start of donepezil subsidy) to 31 December 2013. The inception cohort was chosen from the Pharmaceutical Collections (Pharms) maintained by the Ministry of Health in New Zealand. New users of donepezil, with pre-exposure for 12 months before the index date, were taken to mitigate the challenge of defining and delimiting exposure in the cohort; hence, the measured outcome can, to a large extent, be attributed to donepezil. The scope of our study covered all dispensing data claims for subsidized donepezil in older people aged 65 years or older in New Zealand. The Human Ethics Committee of the University of Otago, New Zealand, approved the study (approval No. H13/001).

Data Source

De-identified data from the Pharms database and National Minimum Dataset were collected for approximately 3 calendar years (2011-2013) from the Ministry of Health, New Zealand. The Pharms database is a national utilization claims database maintained by the Ministry of Health, which captures subsidized donepezil dispensings by all community pharmacies in New Zealand [17]. The Pharms database contained de-identified individual-level dispensing data used in the data analysis. The subsidized donepezil was categorized using the Anatomical Therapeutic and Chemical (ATC) classification for donepezil (N06DA02) developed by the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology's Anatomical Therapeutic and Chemical (WHOCC) classification [18]. Deprivation scores used in this study are social indices derived as a composite variable of categorized basic social needs that include access to a phone or internet, subsidized benefits, income, employment, education, owning a house, or access to a car. The decile scores are a range of ordinal scores from 1 (least deprived) to 10 (most deprived) obtained from mesh blocks, which are the smallest geographical areas defined by Statistics New Zealand, with a population of 60-110 individuals [19].

Adherence and Persistence Measures

Adherence was defined as attaining a variable medication possession ratio (VMPR) of 85% or more. The VMPR served as a proxy to estimate compliance, i.e. following the dispensing interval for refills from the index to the final dispensed date plus the last days of receiving the medicine [20].

Persistence, on the other hand, was defined as the accumulation of time from initiation (first dispensing claim) to discontinuation (last claim plus days of last medicine supply) of treatment with a dispensing gap ≤31 days between refills, while non-adherence (discontinuation) was defined as a gap of more than 31 days, at any time during the 12-month period. The period allowed for the gap was sensitive to changes in measurement for donepezil discontinuation following the implementation of subsidy in New Zealand [7]. Those patients who continued until the end of the study were right censored, while patients who switched medicines were excluded from the study as there was no other subsidized medicine in this therapeutic class. Donepezil dispensings were usually issued or refilled as expected, between 28 days and up to 3 months all at once, and there were only few outliers to this range.

New users of donepezil were defined as not having used donepezil in the preceding 12 months before the index date. The selection of patients was made on the basis of adherence, with a VMPR ≥85% as cut-off, and a sum calculation for each patient on the medicine was done. The VMPR quantifies the accumulation of exposure time from the initial medicine use until the discontinuation of therapy, requiring one or more medicines. The formula below was used to compute the VMPR [20].

The VMPR can be used for patients who discontinued and/or restarted donepezil therapy and had their missing days accounted for in terms of quantity and daily dose (variables in the Pharms database). The VMPR measures medicine stockpile refills even when there are overlaps between gaps.

Statistical Analyses

Descriptive statistics were performed to generate frequencies and percentages of patient characteristics, adherence and persistence measures in the cohort. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis were also used to estimate the cumulative probability and risk of TTFD of donepezil therapy. Data analyses were performed with IBM SPSS for Windows version 22, 2013 [21].

Baseline Characteristics

The cohort of 1,999 patients consisted of 42.7% females, and the mean age of the population was 79.5 ± 6.4 years. The percentage of new donepezil users for the 65- to 69-year age group (7.6%) increased with age up to the ≥85-year age group (23.2%). New Zealand Europeans were the majority of donepezil users (87.0%), and the top new user of donepezil stratified by the District Health Board was Canterbury (16.2%). Only 3.3% of new users were least deprived with a score of 10 (table 1).

Table 1

Cohort baseline characteristics of new users of donepezil in the 3-year follow-up among older people (n = 1,999)

Cohort baseline characteristics of new users of donepezil in the 3-year follow-up among older people (n = 1,999)
Cohort baseline characteristics of new users of donepezil in the 3-year follow-up among older people (n = 1,999)

Time to First Discontinuation

After a 3-year follow-up, 124 patients discontinued treatment after a single (one-off) donepezil dispensing, and the Kaplan-Meier curve found that the probability of continuing donepezil treatment was 0.6 after the first 6 months of treatment. The median TTFD of donepezil was 12.4 months and only a fraction of patients who discontinued donepezil after 6 months declined faster in the non-adherent (57.0%) compared to the adherent group (30.0%) (fig. 1). TTFD of donepezil gave cumulative probabilities, which increased by 35.0% in 6 months, by 49.0% in 12 months and by 77.0% in 24 months from the index date (table 2). The percentage of people on donepezil dispensings after 6 months declined from 100.0 to 81.0%, and after 12 months, it declined from 81.0 to 69.3%, as expected (table 2). Findings from the Cox regression model showed that males had an adjusted risk of TTFD of donepezil that was 1.2 times (95% CI 1.1-1.4) higher than that of females. Furthermore, the risk of TTFD of donepezil in the non-adherent group was 2.2 times (95% CI 1.9-2.6) higher compared to that of the adherent group, while increasing age and deprivation scores were independent of TTFD of donepezil (online suppl. table S1; see www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000441894 for all online suppl. material).

Table 2

TTFD (months) of donepezil in a 3-year follow up of new users (n = 1,999)

TTFD (months) of donepezil in a 3-year follow up of new users (n = 1,999)
TTFD (months) of donepezil in a 3-year follow up of new users (n = 1,999)
Fig. 1

TTFD of donepezil for 3 years of follow-up of new users by VMPR.

Fig. 1

TTFD of donepezil for 3 years of follow-up of new users by VMPR.

Close modal

Adherence and Persistence

Of the new users of donepezil during the study period, 89.0% of the adherent patients (both discontinued and censored) had attained a VMPR of 85% more, 10.4% were non-adherent (discontinued), and the remaining were right censored (table 1). After 6 months of treatment, the proportion of individuals who discontinued donepezil declined significantly (log-rank χ2 statistics = 137.8; p < 0.05) in the non-adherent (60.0%) compared to the adherent group (30.0%) (fig. 1). Persistence was 17.0% after 3 years, donepezil utilization between the 1st and 6th dispensing visit decreased by 19.0% for the patients, and the probability to continue treatment was 0.6 (fig. 2). Persistence in donepezil dispensings after the 12th dispensing visit had declined by 30.7% and the probability had halved (0.5) for donepezil treatment follow-up.

Fig. 2

Persistence in dispensing visits (between 1 and 3 months) for new users of donepezil in older people (n = 1,999).

Fig. 2

Persistence in dispensing visits (between 1 and 3 months) for new users of donepezil in older people (n = 1,999).

Close modal

There is no pharmacoepidemiology study, to our knowledge, on the utilization of donepezil among new users in New Zealand published in the literature. The findings from this study showed the first TTFD population-based study of new donepezil users being older New Zealanders aged 65 years and above. In this study, the continuation rate for the cholinesterase inhibitor in the first 6 months was 65.0% and the finding was similar to a new user design study explored by Roe et al. [22] that reported a continuation rate for ChEI to be 62.7%, within the same study time frame. In contrast, other studies have reported higher continuation rates of 74.0 and 83.0%, respectively [23,24]. Hollingworth and Byrne [25] found that in Australia, medicine subsidies influenced the prescribing trends of ChEIs and led to medicine stockpiling, though not observed in our cohort, towards the end of each calendar year.

In our study, 35.0% of the individuals discontinued donepezil 6 months after treatment, while 40.0-50.0% of patients had discontinued ChEI treatment within the same period in another population-based study [26]. Kogut et al. [23], in a cohort study, reported that 25.0% (compared to 35.0% in the present study) of patients discontinued ChEI treatment within the first 6 months. Le Couteur et al. [4], in a long-term Australian study, found consistent measures after 12 months; 54.7% (compared to 51.0% in the current study) of those were initiated with ChEI treatment and continued on it. After 36 months, only 32.9% (compared to 32.5%) remained on treatment. In a real-world population-level study of Alzheimer's disease patients conducted in Canada, discontinuation rates for donepezil were up to 66.4% at 12 months [26]. Herrmann et al. [27], using administrative health databases, reported discontinuation rates for ChEI of 40.0-50.0% at 12 months. Similarly, Dybicz et al. [9], in a 12-month nursing home population-based study, found 43.1% discontinuations, and Umegaki et al. [28], in a retrospective chart review, found 53.1% (compared to 33.0%) discontinuations at 24 months.

The discontinuation rates of donepezil in our study at 6 months (35.0%) and 12 months (49.0%) were higher compared to the clinical trial discontinuation rate of 10-28.0% reported by Rogers et al. [29]. Access to specialist psychogeriatric and mental health services varied from one jurisdiction to another, and may have contributed to higher donepezil utilization rates found in Canterbury, Waitemata and Auckland compared to other District Health Boards [30].

Persistence was directly influenced by adherence, while age was independent of TTFD of donepezil. The adjusted risk of TTFD of donepezil in the non-adherent group was more than twice that of the adherent group in our findings. However, Kogut et al. [23] found that those aged 85 years or older were more persistent than younger patients. After adjusting for race and institutional setting, they found that patients who were taking medicines that impair cognition were more likely to have discontinued ChEI treatment over 6 months compared to those who did not use such medicines. The continuation rate in the present study had declined to 65.0% after the first 6 months and to 17.0% after 36 months. In a similar long-term study, Le Couteur et al. [4] measured 70.3% persistence at 6 months and retained 26.0% of patients who, at the end of their study, were still on treatment. Courtney et al. [31] found, in a randomized controlled trial study on donepezil, that a persistence of 60.0% (compared to 51.0% in our study) was reached at 12 months and 23.0% (compared to 33.0%) after 24 months of donepezil treatment, which indicated longer persistence in our ‘as-treated' design. Furthermore, Winblad et al. [10] observed donepezil persistence rates of 66.9% in a randomized controlled trial, which retained similar rates in the placebo group (67.4%) after 12 months of exposure. Dispensing visits (1-3 monthly) for new users of donepezil was a useful indicator for assessing persistence in relation to time, as well as the refill trend. Patients with more dispensing visits were less likely to discontinue donepezil treatment, and this finding was consistent with a similar study by Suh et al. [32].

There is very little meaningful information to derive about persistence from clinical trials in relation to donepezil new users in older people; hence, real-world observational data are important to examine persistence patterns, as strictly controlled trial data are often short-term, suffer from selection bias and deviate from real-world clinical practice [31]. Persistence to donepezil is also important for demonstrating efficacy and tolerability, and could have economic implications [26]. Previous studies have demonstrated that improved persistence to donepezil can delay residential care admissions [6]. Single dispensings were observed for some patients during follow-up, and this finding may likely be due to misdiagnosis, switching of medicines or loss to follow-up.

This study has some limitations. The VMPR was used as a proxy for adherence with the assumption that everyone consumed the medicine. Individuals lost during the follow-up were not individually investigated to find out the reasons for their discontinuation. MMSE scores or other cognitive measures were not available to be included as variables in this study. The new users were identified based on the use of donepezil rather than a diagnosis of dementia. Previous studies have identified the underreporting of dementia in national claims data [33]. The clinical reasons for discontinuation of donepezil, including dementia severity, tolerability and adverse effects, were not ascertained. However, the study highlights the initial use and TTFD of donepezil as being consistent, based on population-level data for each patient, within the first 6 months in relation to clinical recommendations for patient characteristics, adherence and persistence in new users.

In conclusion, donepezil adherence, persistence and TTFD beyond the first 6 months in older people were consistent with current clinical practice recommendations. Non-adherence to donepezil treatment reduced persistence and increased the risk of discontinuation. However, the rate of TTFD was high compared to clinical trial discontinuation rates. Future studies should examine the clinical correlates for donepezil discontinuation.

The authors would like to thank the Analytical Services, New Zealand Ministry of Health, for providing the dispensing data extracted from the Pharms database and National Minimum Dataset. The authors wish to also thank the Ri PE (Research in Pharmacoepidemiology) group, School of Pharmacy, University of Otago for providing clinical data management and support. Henry C. Ndukwe was only funded for a doctoral scholarship from the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. The funding institution did not have any role in the study concept, design, data acquisition, data analysis or interpretation.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

1.
Best Practice Advocacy Centre: The pharmacological management of Alzheimer's disease: the place of donepezil. Best Pract J 2010;30:28-35.
2.
Birks J: Cholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;CD005593.
3.
Levy ML, Cummings JL, Kahn-Rose R: Neuropsychiatric symptoms and cholinergic therapy for Alzheimer's disease. Gerontology 1999;45(suppl 1):15-22.
4.
Le Couteur DG, Robinson M, Leverton A, et al: Adherence, persistence and continuation with cholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease. Australas J Ageing 2012;31:164-169.
5.
Francis PT, Nordberg A, Arnold SE: A preclinical view of cholinesterase inhibitors in neuroprotection: do they provide more than symptomatic benefits in Alzheimer's disease? Trends Pharmacol Sci 2005;26:104-111.
6.
Mucha L, Wang SS, Cuffel B, et al: Comparison of cholinesterase inhibitor utilization patterns and associated health care costs in Alzheimer's disease. J Manag Care Pharm 2008;14:451-461.
7.
Pharmaceutical Management Agency: Donepezil funding to start from 1 November 2010. PHARMAC. 2010. http://www.pharmac.govt.nz/2010/08/13/Notification%20of%20donepezil%20funding%20date.pdf (accessed March 19, 2015).
8.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Alzheimer's disease - donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine and memantine (review). NICE technology appraisal guidance 217. 2011. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta217/chapter/2-Clinical-need-and-practice (accessed June 3, 2015).
9.
Dybicz SB, Keohane DJ, Erwin WG, et al: Patterns of cholinesterase-inhibitor use in the nursing home setting: a retrospective analysis. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2006;4:154-160.
10.
Winblad B, Engedal K, Soininen H, et al: A 1-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study of donepezil in patients with mild to moderate AD. Neurology 2001;57:489-495.
11.
Gauthier S: Managing expectations in the long-term treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Gerontology 1999;45(suppl 1):33-38.
12.
New Zealand Formulary (NZF). Drugs for dementia. 2015. www.nzf.org.nz (accessed May 5, 2015).
13.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Dementia interventions. 2015. http://pathways.nice.org.uk/pathways/dementia#path=view%3A/pathways/dementia/dementia-interventions.xml&content=view-index (accessed May 4, 2015).
14.
Shobha S, Carole D: Discontinuation syndrome following donepezil cessation. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2003;18:282.
15.
Best Practice Advocacy Centre: Donepezil to be funded on pharmaceutical schedule. Best Pract J 2010;29:54-55.
16.
Doody RS, Corey-Bloom J, Zhang R, et al: Safety and tolerability of donepezil at doses up to 20 mg/day: results from a pilot study in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Drugs Aging 2008;25:163.
17.
Ndukwe H, Tordoff J, Wang T, et al: Psychotropic medicine utilization in older people in New Zealand from 2005 to 2013. Drugs Aging 2014;31:755-768.
18.
World Health Organisation Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (WHOCC): Guidelines for ATC classification index with DDDs, Oslo 2013. 2014. www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/ (accessed May 30, 2014).
19.
White P, Gunston J, Salmond C: Atlas of Socioeconomic Deprivation in New Zealand. Wellington, Ministry of Health, 2008.
20.
Choudhry NK, Shrank WH, Levin RL, et al: Measuring concurrent adherence to multiple related medications. Am J Manag Care 2009;15:457-464.
21.
IBM Corp: IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows; in SPSS® I. Armonk, IBM Corp, 2013.
22.
Roe CM, Anderson MJ, Spivack B: How many patients complete an adequate trial of donepezil? Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2002;16:49.
23.
Kogut SJ, El-Maouche D, Abughosh SM: Decreased persistence to cholinesterase inhibitor therapy with concomitant use of drugs that can impair cognition. Pharmacotherapy 2005;25:1729-1735.
24.
Cortes F, Portet F, Touchon J, et al: Six and 18-month changes in mild to moderate Alzheimer's patients treated with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: what can we learn for clinical outcomes of therapeutic trials? J Nutr Health Aging 2007;11:330-337.
25.
Hollingworth SA, Byrne GJ: Prescribing trends in cognition enhancing drugs in Australia. Int Psychogeriatr 2011;23:238-245.
26.
Amuah JE, Hogan DB, Eliasziw M, et al: Persistence with cholinesterase inhibitor therapy in a population-based cohort of patients with Alzheimer's disease. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2010;19:670-679.
27.
Herrmann N, Binder C, Dalziel W, et al: Persistence with cholinesterase inhibitor therapy for dementia: an observational administrative health database study. Drugs Aging 2009;26:403-407.
28.
Umegaki H, Itoh A, Suzuki Y, et al: Discontinuation of donepezil for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease in geriatric practice. Int Psychogeriatr 2008;20:800-806.
29.
Rogers SL, Doody RS, Mohs RC, et al: Donepezil improves cognition and global function in Alzheimer disease: a 15-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arch Int Med 1998;158:1021-1031.
30.
Davis PB, Yee RL, Millar J: Accounting for medical variation: the case of prescribing activity in a New Zealand general practice sample. Soc Sci Med 1994;39:367-374.
31.
Courtney C, Farrell D, Gray R, et al: Long-term donepezil treatment in 565 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD2000): randomised double-blind trial. Lancet 2004;363:2105-2115.
32.
Suh D-C, Thomas SK, Valiyeva E, et al: Drug persistency of two cholinesterase inhibitors: rivastigmine versus donepezil in elderly patients with Alzheimer's disease. Drugs Aging 2005;22:695-707.
33.
Narayan SW, Hilmer SN, Horsburgh S, et al: Anticholinergic component of the Drug Burden Index and the Anticholinergic Drug Scale as measures of anticholinergic exposure in older people in New Zealand: a population-level study. Drugs Aging 2013;30:927-934.
Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes as well as any distribution of modified material requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.