Purpose: To determine the accuracy of conventional computed tomography (CT) scan in the preoperative prediction of an involved circumferential resection margin (CRM) in primary rectal cancer. Methods: 125 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum underwent CT of the abdomen before undergoing total mesorectal excision. Scans were scored by three observers, differing in experience. The main outcome was yes/no involvement of the CRM. Histology was taken as reference standard. Results: For the most experienced observer, observer A, sensitivity was 46.7% and specificity 92.6%. For observer B, sensitivity was 46.7% and specificity 89.5%. For the least experienced observer C, sensitivity was 43.3% and specificity 92.6%. Inter-observer variability was good between observers A and B (ĸ 0.648), B and C (ĸ 0.648), and intermediate between A and C (ĸ 0.542). Discrepancies occurred in a total of 34 patients; 25 had a CT scan of low technical quality, 10 an anteriorly located distal tumor. Conclusion: Conventional CT scan lacks sensitivity for a clinical use in the preoperative assessment of an involved CRM in primary rectal cancer. Modern multislice spiral CT will probably resolve some of the problems of conventional CT; however, further research is needed to establish its role.

Keywords:
Rectum, computed tomography, Neoplasms, Rectal cancer surgery, Circumferential resection margin
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
2007
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.