Introduction: Text message-based interventions reduce colonoscopy no-show rates and improve bowel preparation scores. In this non-randomized study, we assessed whether an interactive text messaging system could improve colonoscopy outcomes. Methods: Colonoscopy pre-procedural instructions were programmed into a dedicated software platform created for this study. In the intervention arm, text messages were sent to veterans during a 4-week study period. Validated pre-procedural satisfaction questionnaires were completed by patients during standard protocol and intervention periods. Demographics and colonoscopy outcomes data were compared between the standard protocol and intervention arms, including procedure completion rate on scheduled date, Boston bowel preparation score (BPPS), adenoma detection rate, and satisfaction. Results: Of 241 patients, 128 were in the standard protocol arm and 113 in the intervention arm. Higher proportions of patients receiving text messages underwent colonoscopy on their scheduled date (69.9%) compared to the ones in the standard protocol (50.8%, p = 0.015). Patients with ≥3 interactions with the system had 80.6% likelihood of completing colonoscopy on the scheduled date compared to 56.9% with <3 interactions and 50.8% with standard protocol (p < 0.001). Frequency of interaction with the system was similar between older (>65 years) and younger patients (p = 1.0). Among older patients, colonoscopy was completed successfully in 84.2% when alert-based human interactions occurred compared to 65.6% in those without and 47.9% with standard protocol (p = 0.018). More than 90% indicated they would recommend the system to patients undergoing future colonoscopy. Conclusion: An interactive text messaging system improves successful colonoscopy rates in a VA setting, with greatest impact in older patients.

1.
Joseph
DA
,
Meester
RG
,
Zauber
AG
,
Manninen
DL
,
Winges
L
,
Dong
FB
, et al.
Colorectal cancer screening: estimated future colonoscopy need and current volume and capacity
.
Cancer
.
2016 Aug 15
;
122
(
16
):
2479
86
. .
2.
National Center for Health Statistics
.
Data file documentation, National Health Interview Survey
.
2010
.
3.
Harewood
GC
,
Sharma
VK
,
de Garmo
P
.
Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia
.
Gastrointest Endosc
.
2003 Jul
;
58
(
1
):
76
9
. .
4.
Chang
JT
,
Sewell
JL
,
Day
LW
.
Prevalence and predictors of patient no-shows to outpatient endoscopic procedures scheduled with anesthesia
.
BMC Gastroenterol
.
2015 Sep 30
;
15
:
123
. .
5.
Partin
MR
,
Gravely
A
,
Gellad
ZF
,
Nugent
S
,
Burgess
JF
 Jr
,
Shaukat
A
, et al.
Factors associated with missed and cancelled colonoscopy appointments at veterans health administration facilities
.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
.
2016 Feb
;
14
(
2
):
259
67
. .
6.
Lin
CL
,
Mistry
N
,
Boneh
J
,
Li
H
,
Lazebnik
R
.
Text message reminders increase appointment adherence in a pediatric clinic: a randomized controlled trial
.
Int J Pediatr
.
2016
;
2016
:
8487378
. .
7.
Thakkar
J
,
Kurup
R
,
Laba
TL
,
Santo
K
,
Thiagalingam
A
,
Rodgers
A
, et al.
Mobile telephone text messaging for medication adherence in chronic disease: a meta-analysis
.
JAMA Intern Med
.
2016 Mar
;
176
(
3
):
340
9
. .
8.
Walter
B
,
Klare
P
,
Strehle
K
,
Aschenbeck
J
,
Ludwig
L
,
Dikopoulos
N
, et al.
Improving the quality and acceptance of colonoscopy preparation by reinforced patient education with short message service: results from a randomized, multicenter study (PERICLES-II)
.
Gastrointest Endosc
.
2019 Mar
;
89
(
3
):
506
e4
. .
9.
Wu
Y
,
Liang
Y
,
Zhou
Q
,
Liu
H
,
Lin
G
,
Cai
W
, et al.
Effectiveness of a short message service intervention to motivate people with positive results in preliminary colorectal cancer screening to undergo colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
.
Cancer
.
2019 Jul 1
;
125
(
13
):
2252
61
. .
10.
Lee
YJ
,
Kim
ES
,
Choi
JH
,
Lee
KI
,
Park
KS
,
Cho
KB
, et al.
Impact of reinforced education by telephone and short message service on the quality of bowel preparation: a randomized controlled study
.
Endoscopy
.
2015 Nov
;
47
(
11
):
1018
27
. .
11.
Marko-Holguin
M
,
Cordel
SL
,
Van Voorhees
BW
,
Fogel
J
,
Sykes
E
,
Fitzgibbon
M
, et al.
A two-way interactive text messaging application for low-income patients with chronic medical conditions: design-thinking development approach
.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
.
2019 May 1
;
7
(
5
):
e11833
. .
12.
Hutchings
A
,
Cheung
WY
,
Alrubaiy
L
.
Development and validation of the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Satisfaction Questionnaire (GESQ)
.
Endoscopy
.
2015 Dec
;
47
(
12
):
1137
43
.
13.
Nathoo
S
,
Ho
L
,
Jibaja-Weiss
M
,
Montealegre
JR
,
Suarez
MG
,
Canadas
K
, et al.
Text messaging reminders improve colonoscopy show rates in a county endoscopy unit
.
Am J Gastroenterol
.
2018
;
113
(
Suppl 1
):
S647
8
. .
14.
Keren
D
,
Rainis
T
,
Stermer
E
,
Lavy
A
.
A nine-year audit of open-access upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: results and experience of a single centre
.
Can J Gastroenterol
.
2011 Feb
;
25
(
2
):
83
8
. .
15.
Staff
DM
,
Saeian
K
,
Rochling
F
,
Narayanan
S
,
Kern
M
,
Shaker
R
, et al.
Does open access endoscopy close the door to an adequately informed patient?
Gastrointest Endosc
.
2000 Aug
;
52
(
2
):
212
7
. .
16.
Committee ASoP
;
Chandrasekhara
V
,
Chandrasekhara
V
,
Eloubeidi
MA
,
Bruining
DH
,
Chathadi
K
,
Faulx
AL
, et al.
Open-access endoscopy
.
Gastrointest Endosc
.
2015
;
81
(
6
):
1326
9
. .
17.
Abuksis
G
,
Mor
M
,
Segal
N
,
Shemesh
I
,
Morad
I
,
Plaut
S
, et al.
A patient education program is cost-effective for preventing failure of endoscopic procedures in a gastroenterology department
.
Am J Gastroenterol
.
2001 Jun
;
96
(
6
):
1786
90
. .
18.
Mahmud
N
,
Doshi
SD
,
Coniglio
MS
,
Clermont
M
,
Bernard
D
,
Reitz
C
, et al.
An automated text message navigation program improves the show rate for outpatient colonoscopy
.
Health Educ Behav
.
2019 Dec
;
46
(
6
):
942
6
. .
19.
Park
J
,
Kim
TO
,
Lee
NY
,
Kim
H
,
Seo
EH
,
Heo
NY
, et al.
The effectiveness of short message service to assure the preparation-to-colonoscopy interval before bowel preparation for colonoscopy
.
Gastroenterol Res Pract
.
2015
;
2015
:
628049
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.