Aim: To determine the immediate and later role(s) of initial CT in patients presenting with their first episode of acute left-colonic diverticulitis. Methods: Prospective inclusion of 542 patients hospitalized in the University Hospital of Geneva between 1986 and 1997. 465 (86%) patients had a CT. CT grading of diverticulitis was divided between moderate diverticulitis (no sign of colonic perforation) and severe diverticulitis (signs of colonic perforation). Results: During the index hospitalization, surgical treatment of the first episode of acute diverticulitis was needed in 26% of patients with CT-severe diverticulitis compared to 4% for patients with CT-moderate diverticulitis. At 5 years of follow-up after medical treatment of the first episode, incidence of remote complications was the highest (49%) for patients with CT-severe diverticulitis and the lowest (22%) for patients with CT-moderate diverticulitis. Finally, we found that the location of the diseased segment, which is important to guide the type of resection in case of elective surgery, varies in 35% of patients who had 2 episodes of acute diverticulitis. Conclusion: CT is the indispensable tool both to confirm the suspected diagnosis of acute diverticulitis and to appreciate the risk of surgical treatment during the initial acute episode. Moreover, CT grading of diverticulitis is a statistically significant prognostic parameter of the chance of secondary complicated outcome after a first acute diverticulitis episode successfully treated medically. Finally, CT gives the exact location of diverticulitis. In case of elective surgery this colonic segment should be removed.

Keywords:
Acute left-colonic diverticulitis, Computed tomography, Recurrence, Elective surgery
1.
DeStiger KK, Keating DP: Imaging update: acute colonic diverticulitis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2009;22:147–155.
2.
Hammond NA, Nikolaidis P, Miller FH: Left lower-quadrant pain: guidelines from the American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria. Am Fam Physician 2010;82:766–770.
3.
Ambrosetti P, Jenny A, Becker C, Terrier TF, Morel P: Acute left colonic diverticulitis. Compared performance of computed tomography and water-soluble contrast enema: prospective evaluation of 420 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:1363–1367.
4.
Ambrosetti P, Becker C, Terrier F: Colonic diverticulitis: impact of imaging on surgical management. A prospective study of 542 patients. Eur Radiol 2002;12:1145–1149.
5.
Ambrosetti P, Grossholz M, Becker C, Terrier F, Morel Ph: Computed tomography in acute left-colonic diverticulitis. Br J Surg 1997;84:532–534.
6.
Chautems RC, Ambrosetti P, Ludwig A, et al: Long-term follow-up after first acute episode of sigmoid diverticulitis: is surgery mandatory? A prospective study of 118 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:962–966.
7.
Ambrosetti P, Chautems R, Soravia C, Peiris-Waser N, Terrier F: Long-term outcome of mesocolic and pelvic diverticular abscesses: a prospective study of 73 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:787–791.
8.
Gervaz P, Platon A, Widmer L, Poletti PA: A clinical and radiological comparison of sigmoid diverticulitis episodes 1 and 2. Colorectal Dis 2011, Epub ahead of print.
9.
Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, et al: Helical CT with only colonic contrast material for diagnosing diverticulitis: prospective evaluation of 150 patients. Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:1445–1449.
10.
Werner A, Diehl SJ, Farag-Soliman M, Düber C: Multi-slice spiral CT in routine diagnosis of suspected left-sided colonic diverticulitis: a prospective study of 120 patients. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2596–2603.
11.
Laméris W, van Randen A, van Gulik TM, et al: A clinical decision rule to establish the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis at the emergency department. Dis Colon Rectum 2010;53:896–904.
12.
Andeweg CS, Knobben L, Hendriks JCM, Bleichrodt RP, van Goor H: How to diagnose acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis. Proposal for a clinical scoring system. Ann Surg 2011;253:940–946.
13.
Käser SA, Fankhauser G, Glauser PM, Toia D, Maurer CA: Diagnostic value of inflammation markers in predicting perforation in acute sigmoid diverticulitis. World J Surg 2010;34:2717–2722.
14.
Shaikh S, Krukowski ZH: Outcome of a conservative policy for managing acute sigmoid diverticulitis. Br J Surg 2007;94:876–879.
15.
Kaiser AM, Jiang JK, Lake JP, et al: The management of complicated diverticulitis and the role of computed tomography. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:910–917.
16.
Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann O, et al: Acute left-colonic diverticulitis: can CT findings be used to predict recurrence? Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:1159–1165.
17.
Hall JF, Roberts PL, Ricciardi R, et al: Long-term follow-up after an initial episode of diverticulitis: what are the predictors of recurrence? Dis Colon Rectum 2011;54:283–288.
18.
Hjern F, Josephson T, Altman D, Holmström B, Johansson C: Outcome of younger patients with acute diverticulitis. Br J Surg 2008;95:758–764.
19.
Nelson RS, Velasco A, Mukesh BN: Management of diverticulitis in younger patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:1341–1345.
20.
Thaler K, Baig M, Berho M, et al: Determinants of recurrence after sigmoid resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:385–388.
21.
Benn PL, Wolff BG, Ilstrup DM: Level of anastomosis and recurrent colonic diverticulitis. Am J Surg 1986;151:269–271.
22.
Forgione A, Leroy J, Cahill RA, et al: Prospective evaluation of functional outcome after laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy. Ann Surg 2009;249:218–224.
23.
Ambrosetti P, Francis K, Weintraub D, Weintraub J: Functional results following elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy after CT-proven diagnosis of acute diverticulitis: evaluation of 43 patients and review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 2007;11:767–772.
24.
Hall JF, Roberts PL, Ricciardi R, et al: Colonic diverticulitis: does age predict severity disease on CT imaging? Dis Colon Rectum 2010;53:121–125.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.