Laparoscopic surgery has been widely studied in colorectal cancer and its feasibility and safety have been proven to the extent that in the UK a national laparoscopic colorectal surgery programme has been established. The advantages of laparoscopic surgery have been studied less systematically in diverticular disease. Several prospective uncontrolled studies have demonstrated that laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease is feasible with low morbidity and mortality rates. A large population study in the USA has demonstrated elective laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease to have reduced hospital stay by 1 day, and a lower rate of intra-operative and post-operative complications over open surgery. Some of the reported differences may be attributable to selection bias of more complex cases to open surgery. A Cochrane systematic review examining 11 non-randomized and 1 randomized study showed laparoscopic surgery to be feasible in diverticular disease, although there might be a higher minor complications rate in laparoscopic resections. Attention has been focused on surgical techniques as means to reduce complications. There is a belief that preservation of the inferior mesenteric and superior rectal artery protects from anastomotic leak, but a study from the USA looking into that point did not find a difference. The application of hand-assisted laparoscopy seems to help cope with complex diverticular masses and colovesical fistulas. New hybrid techniques incorporating specimen extraction via rectum may reduce complications further. Single incision laparoscopic surgery has recently been shown to be feasible. Although minimally invasive techniques appear superior in terms of early outcomes than open surgery the choice of minimally invasive technique seems to be less relevant to outcomes if accompanied by an appropriate level of surgical experience and expertise. Patient-related factors such as comorbidities or degree of disease complexity are more likely to be related to complication rates.

Keywords:
Laparoscopic surgery, Complications, Outcomes
1.
Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Müller JM: Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;3:CD003145.
2.
El Zarrok Elgazwi K, Baca I, Grzybowski L, Jaacks A: Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis: a prospective study. JSLS 2010;14:469–475.
3.
Katsuno G, Fukunaga M, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S: Laparoscopic one-stage resection of right and left colon complicated diverticulitis equivalent to Hinchey stage I–II. Surg Today 2011;41:647–654.
4.
Klarenbeek BR, Veenhof AA, Bergamaschi R, van der Peet DL, van den Broek WT, de Lange ES, Bemelman WA, Heres P, Lacy AM, Engel AF, Cuesta MA: Laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis decreases major morbidity rates: a randomized control trial: short-term results of the Sigma Trial. Ann Surg 2009;249:39–44.
5.
Klarenbeek BR, Coupé VM, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA: The cost effectiveness of elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection for symptomatic diverticular disease: financial outcome of the randomized control Sigma trial. Surg Endosc 2011;25:776–783.
6.
Klarenbeek BR, Bergamaschi R, Veenhof AA, van der Peet DL, van den Broek WT, de Lange ES, Bemelman WA, Heres P, Lacy AM, Cuesta MA: Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid resection for diverticular disease: follow-up assessment of the randomized control Sigma trial. Surg Endosc 2011;25:1121–1126.
7.
Siddiqui MR, Sajid MS, Qureshi S, Cheek E, Baig MK: Elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticular disease has fewer complications than conventional surgery: a meta-analysis. Am J Surg 2010;200:144–161.
8.
Cirocchi R, Farinella E, Trastulli S, Sciannameo F, Audisio RA: Elective sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: Laparoscopic versus open surgery: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2011, Epub ahead of print.
9.
Masoomi H, Buchberg B, Nguyen B, Tung V, Stamos MJ, Mills S: Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open colectomy in elective surgery for diverticulitis. World J Surg 2011;35:2143–2148.
10.
Pendlimari R, Touzios JG, Azodo IA, Chua HK, Dozois EJ, Cima RR, Larson DW: Short-term outcomes after elective minimally invasive colectomy for diverticulitis. Br J Surg 2011;98:431–435.
11.
Kirchhoff P, Matz D, Dincler S, Buchmann P: Predictive risk factors for intra- and postoperative complications in 526 laparoscopic sigmoid resections due to recurrent diverticulitis: a multivariate analysis. World J Surg 2011;35:677–683.
12.
Lehmann RK, Brounts LR, Johnson EK, Rizzo JA, Steele SR: Does sacrifice of the inferior mesenteric artery or superior rectal artery affect anastomotic leak following sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis? A retrospective review. Am J Surg 2011;201:623–627.
13.
Nguyen SQ, Divino CM, Vine A, Reiner M, Katz LB, Salky B: Laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease complicated by fistulae. JSLS 2006;10:166–168.
14.
Engledow AH, Pakzad F, Ward NJ, Arulampalam T, Motson RW: Laparoscopic resection of diverticular fistulae: a 10-year experience. Colorectal Dis 2007;9:632–634.
15.
Vestweber B, Alfes A, Paul C, Haaf F, Vestweber KH: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a promising approach to sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease. Surg Endosc 2010;24:3225–3228.
16.
Wolthuis AM, Van Geluwe B, Fieuws S, Penninckx F, D’Hoore A: Laparoscopic sigmoid resection with transrectal specimen extraction: a Systematic Review. Colorectal Dis 2011, Epub ahead of print.
17.
Collinson FJ, Jayne DG, Pigazzi A, Tsang C, Barrie JM, Edlin R, Garbett C, Guillou P, Holloway I, Howard H, Marshall H, McCabe C, Pavitt S, Quirke P, Rivers CS, Brown JM: An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012;27:233–241.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.