Recently introduced endoscopy-based imaging methods such as double-balloon endoscopy or wireless capsule endoscopy can visualize the complete small bowel. These approaches are quite invasive diagnostic methods. Therefore, radiological small bowel imaging is also still considered as the primary imaging approach to diagnose pathological changes of the small bowel. In this review article the most important small bowel imaging modalities such as conventional fluoroscopy, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound are discussed. Additionally the most important diseases, which can affect the small bowel, are evaluated and the optimal imaging modalities are pointed out, respectively.

1.
Schreyer AG, Debl K, Herfarth H: Indications for magnetic resonance imaging in internal medicine. When do we really need this technology? Internist (Berl) 2010;51:451–462.
2.
Schreyer AG, Gölder S, Seitz J, Herfarth H: New diagnostic avenues in inflammatory bowel diseases. Capsule endoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging and virtual enteroscopy. Dig Dis 2003;21:129–137.
3.
Schreyer AG, Seitz J, Feuerbach S, Rogler G, Herfarth H: Modern imaging using computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2004;10:45–54.
4.
Maglinte DD, Kelvin FM, O’Connor K, Lappas JC, Chernish SM: Current status of small bowel radiography. Abdom Imaging 1996;21:247–257.
5.
Ott DJ, Chen YM, Gelfand DW, Van Swearingen F, Munitz HA: Detailed per-oral small bowel examination vs. enteroclysis. Part II: Radiographic accuracy. Radiology 1985;155:31–34.
6.
Toms AP, Barltrop A, Freeman AH: A prospective randomised study comparing enteroclysis with small bowel follow-through examinations in 244 patients. Eur Radiol 2001;11:1155–1160.
7.
Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD: Enteroclysis or small bowel follow-through in Crohn’s diseases? Gastroenterology 1998;114:1349–1351.
8.
Sellink JL: Radiologic examination of the small intestine by duodenal intubation. Acta Radiol 1974;15:318–332.
9.
Jaffe TA, Gaca AM, Delaney S, Yoshizumi TT, Toncheva G, Nguyen G, et al: Radiation doses from small-bowel follow-through and abdominopelvic MDCT in Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:1015–1022.
10.
Schreyer AG, Geissler A, Albrich H, Scholmerich J, Feuerbach S, Rogler G, et al: Abdominal MRI after enteroclysis or with oral contrast in patients with suspected or proven Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2:491–497.
11.
Wold PB, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Sandborn WJ: Assessment of small bowel Crohn’s disease: noninvasive peroral CT enterography compared with other imaging methods and endoscopy – feasibility study. Radiology 2003;229:275–281.
12.
Rimola J, Rodriguez S, Garcia-Bosch O, Ricart E, Pages M, Pellise M, et al: Role of 3.0-T MR colonography in the evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease. Radiographics 2009;29:701–719.
13.
Schreyer AG, Ludwig D, Koletzko S, Hoffmann JC, Preiss JC, Zeitz M, et al: Updated German S3 guideline regarding the diagnosis of Crohn’s disease – implementation of radiological modalities. Rofo 2010;182:116–121.
14.
Ajaj W, Pelster G, Treichel U, Vogt FM, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG, et al: Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology. Gut 2003;52:1738–1743.
15.
Schreyer AG, Golder S, Scheibl K, Volk M, Lenhart M, Timmer A, et al: Dark lumen magnetic resonance enteroclysis in combination with MRI colonography for whole bowel assessment in patients with Crohn’s disease: first clinical experience. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2005;11:388–394.
16.
Schreyer AG, Hoffstetter P, Daneschnejad M, Jung EM, Pawlik M, Friedrich C, et al: Comparison of conventional abdominal CT with MR enterography in patients with active Crohn’s disease and acute abdominal pain. Acad Radiol 2010;17:352–357.
17.
Low RN, Sebrechts CP, Politoske DA, Bennett MT, Flores S, Snyder RJ, et al: Crohn’s disease with endoscopic correlation: single-shot fast spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology 2002;222:652–660.
18.
Schreyer AG, Finkenzeller T, Gossmann H, Daneschnejad M, Muller-Wille R, Schacherer D, et al: Microcirculation and perfusion with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in Crohn’s disease: first results with linear contrast harmonic imaging. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2008;40:143–155.
19.
Schreyer AG, Landfried K, Zorger N, Hoffstetter P, Ammer J, Fellner C, et al: Transmural penetration of intravenously applied microbubbles during contrast-enhanced ultrasound as a new diagnostic feature in patients with GVHD of the bowel. Bone Marrow Transplant 2011;46:1006–1011.
20.
Schreyer AG, Menzel C, Friedrich C, Poschenrieder F, Egger L, Dornia C, et al: Comparison of high-resolution ultrasound and MR enterography in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:1018–1025.
21.
Bourreille A, Ignjatovic A, Aabakken L, Loftus EV Jr, Eliakim R, Pennazio M, et al: Role of small-bowel endoscopy in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease: an international OMED-ECCO consensus. Endoscopy 2009;41:618–637.
22.
Desmond AN, O’Regan K, Curran C, McWilliams S, Fitzgerald T, Maher MM, et al: Crohn’s disease: factors associated with exposure to high levels of diagnostic radiation. Gut 2008;57:1524–1529.
23.
Zuckerman GR, Prakash C, Askin MP, Lewis BS: AGA technical review on the evaluation and management of occult and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 2000;118:201–221.
24.
Herlinger H, Maglinte DD: Jejunal fold separation in adult celiac disease: relevance of enteroclysis. Radiology 1986;158:605–611.
25.
Soyer P, Boudiaf M, Fargeaudou Y, Dray X, Hamzi L, Vahedi K, et al: Celiac disease in adults: evaluation with MDCT enteroclysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:1483–1492.
26.
Lohan DG, Alhajeri AN, Cronin CG, Roche CJ, Murphy JM: MR enterography of small-bowel lymphoma: potential for suggestion of histologic subtype and the presence of underlying celiac disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:287–293.
27.
Balci NC, Noone T, Akun E, Akinci A, Klor HU: Juxtapapillary diverticulum: findings on MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:487–492.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.