Abstract
Prevention is and will remain a major goal of medicine and gastroenterology. Economics will have a major influence. Preventive approaches will need to prove a favorable cost-benefit ratio before they are authorized for broad implementation. Personalized medicine is just starting, but undoubtedly it will accelerate, gain relevance and become an integral part of our clinical practice. Physicians in general and gastroenterologists specifically will need to seriously contemplate retraining/refocusing to gain competence in genetic/proteomic evaluation of individuals, or risk a significant degree of obsolescence.
References
1.
Johanson JF (ed): Risk Factors and Prevention. Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven, 1997, pp 296.
2.
Kirkegaard H, Johnsen NF, Christensen J, et al: Association of adherence to lifestyle recommendations and risk of colorectal cancer: a prospective Danish cohort study. BMJ 2010;341:e-5504.
3.
Rothwell PM, Wilson M, Elwin CF, et al: Long-term effect of aspirin on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: 20-year follow-up of five randomised trials. Lancet 2010;376:1741–50.
4.
Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, et al: Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:1–8.
5.
Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al: Screening and surveillance for detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008;134:1570–1595.
6.
US Preventive Services Task Force: Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:627–37.
7.
Hoff G, Dominitz JA: Contrasting US and European approaches to colorectal cancer screening: which is best? Gut 2010;59:407–414.
8.
Malila N, Oivanen T, Malminiemi O, et al: Colorectal cancer screening in Finland: details of the national screening programme implemented in Autumn 2004. J Med Screen 2005;112:28–32.
9.
Mitchal A, Schreiner, et al: Proximal and large hyperplastic and nondysplastic serrated polyps detected by colonoscopy are associated with neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2010;139:1497–1502.
10.
Hiraoka S, Kato J, Fujiki S, et al: The presence of large serrated polyps increases. Gastroenterology 2010;139:1503–1510.
11.
Kussman MJ: VHA Directive 2007-004. Colorectal Cancer Screening. Washington, Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, 2007.
12.
Odze RD: A balancing view: pathologist/clinician interaction is essential. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:1331–1333.
13.
Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V, et al: Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:89–95.
14.
Lagergren J, Ye W, Bergström R, et al: Utility of endoscopic screening for upper gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma. JAMA 2000;284:961–962.
15.
Jones TF, Sharma P, Daaboul B, et al: Yield of intestinal metaplasia in patients with suspected short-segment Barrett’s esophagus on repeat endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 2002;47:2108–2111.
16.
Odze RD, Maley CC: Neoplasia without dysplasia: lessons from Barrett’s esophagus and other tubal gut neoplasms. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2010;134:896–906.
17.
Gress FG: Endoscopic Management of Barrett’s Esophagus. Clinical Update. Oak Brook/IL, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2009, p16.
18.
Inadoni JM, Somsouk M, Madanick RD: A cost-utility analysis of ablative therapy for Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 2009;136:2101–2114.
19.
Das A, Wells C, Kim HJ: An economic analysis of endoscopic ablative therapy for management of nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy 2009;41:400–408.
20.
Peters FTM, Ganesh S, Kuipers EJ: Endoscopic regression of Barrett’s oesophagus during omeprazole treatment; a randomised double-blind study. Gut 1999;45:489–494.
21.
El-Serag HB, Aguirre TV, Davis S: Proton pump inhibitors are associated with reduced incidence of dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1877–1883.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.