To analyze postprandial gastroesophageal reflux by means of ambulatory gastroesophageal pH monitoring for 24 h, four groups were studied prospectively: group A: 22 healthy volunteers; group B: 31 consecutive patients undergoing medical treatment for gastroesophageal reflux, group Cl: 20 consecutive patients with symptomatic reflux awaiting surgical treatment by means of Nissen fundoplication (pre-Nissen evaluation) and group C2: group C1 patients reevaluated 6 months postoperatively (post-Nissen evaluation). Gastroesophageal pH, as a measure of post-prandial reflux following the main meal of the day was evaluated by the Kaye test. In groups B, C1 and C2, esophageal manometry was also performed. Gastroesophageal pH monitoring revealed significant qualitative as well as quantitative differences in postprandial gastroesophageal reflux experienced by healthy subjects (group A) and surgically treated patients (group C2) compared to patients with pathologic reflux (groups B and C1). The postprandial reflux was significantly more acid and more important (Kaye’s test value) in groups Cl and B than in groups A and C2. There were no differences in postprandial reflux between healthy subjects and patients treated by Nissen fundoplication (group C2). Only the pressure and length of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) showed differences after Nissen fundoplication. We conclude that patients with pathologic reflux have more severe postprandial reflux than normal subjects; Nissen fundoplication corrects the degree of postprandial reflux to a normal range by elevating the LES pressure (11.3 × 1.4 vs. 22.4 ± 1.6 mm Hg; p < 0.001) and length (2.7 ± 0.2 vs. 3.7 ± 0.1 cm; p < 0.001) in our patients.

Keywords:
Gastroesophageal reflux, Kaye’s test, 24-hour pH monitoring, Antireflux surgery, Nissen fundoplication
© 1993 S. Karger AG, Basel
1993
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.