Background: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a prevalent problem within the female population with associated high psycho-social impact. Transobturator tape procedure is a well-established procedure to treat the same, but the results may be influenced by various preoperative demographic and clinical factors. Patients and Methods: The study group comprised of 50 female patients with genuine SUI, who were then divided into subgroups based on demographic and clinical factors. Outcomes were compared between these subgroups at 6 and 12 months using self-reported questionnaires and provocative stress test. Results: Our results show positive correlation with statistically significant better surgical outcomes in premenopausal patients, patients aged <50 years and those having urethral mobility > 30 degrees. Statistically significant poor outcomes were seen in those having undergone hysterectomy or Caesarean section. No correlation was found with history of smoking or the patient's body mass index. Conclusions: In conclusion, the transobturator tape procedure appears to be more effective in premenopausal women, women aged < 50 years, women without history of hysterectomy/lower section Caesarean section, and presence of urethral hypermobility > 30 degrees. On the other hand, outcomes do not appear to be influenced by the patient's body mass index or smoking status.

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is defined as the involuntary leakage of urine on effort, exertion, or coughing [1]. The prevalence of SUI increases with age, with a 20-30% rate in young adults, 30-40% in middle age and maximum around 50% after menopause [2]. SUI in most cases is caused by loss of urethral support resulting in hypermobility and lower pressure transmission to the urethra than the bladder. This is surgically curable and many procedures have been introduced for stabilising the bladder neck and/or urethra. Pioneered by Delorme in 2001, the transobturator approach was developed with an aim to reduce the side effects of the retropubic sling procedure such as bladder perforation without entering the space beyond the endopelvic fascia [3]. Parameters such as age, BMI, menopausal status, smoking, history of pelvic surgery (hysterectomy/lower section Caesarean section (LSCS)) and urethral hypermobility are risk factors for stress incontinence and may influence the outcome of transobturator tape (TOT) implantation [4,5].

Chronically increased stress on the pelvic floor is generally regarded as causally related to the increased prevalence of urinary incontinence in obese women as compared to normal-weight women [6]. The influence of obesity on surgical outcomes in SUI patients is still under debate. Obesity may have an impact on the results of the retropubic open or laparoscopic operation for SUI [7]. On the other hand, in the tension-free vaginal tape era, obesity may not influence the outcomes because the procedure is less invasive [8,9,10]. Only few data are available to assess the impact of obesity on the TOT procedure.

It is well demonstrated that the urogenital organs are highly sensitive to the influence of estrogen. In fact, estrogen receptors have been found in the urethra, bladder trigone, round ligaments as well as in the levator ani muscles [11,12]. Following these findings, the idea arose of a possible relation between SUI and the causes of decreased estrogen status, such as menopause.

To date results presented in a number of papers are ambiguous and do not indicate clearly if the above mentioned demographic parameters affect the clinical outcome of midurethral sling surgery. To the best of our knowledge, no study has assessed results after TOT surgery based on presence or absence of history of hysterectomy/LSCS or that of smoking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of TOT implantation taking into account the influence of each of these 6 parameters separately and help clarify some of the doubts that exist with regards to the prognostic significance of these different parameters with regards to surgical outcomes after TOT surgery. It is important to understand the significance of these factors to help better manage patients and treatment expectations.

Women presenting with SUI (defined as involuntary leakage during physical activity, coughing or sneezing), underwent a standardized basic office evaluation and were eligible for the study if they had a history of symptoms of SUI for at least 3 months and failure to respond to standard medical treatment and pelvic floor exercises, a post void residual urine (PVRU) volume of less than 150 ml, a negative urinalysis or urine culture, a desire for surgery for SUI, and a positive provocative stress test (defined as an observed transurethral loss of urine that was simultaneous with a cough or Valsalva manoeuvre). A random 150 ml cut off for PVRU was chosen to exclude out patients of voiding dysfunction. The provocative stress test, which had to be positive for inclusion in the study was performed at the time of cystoscopic confirmation for SUI at a volume of approximate 300 ml along with Bonney test. A clinical assessment of urethral mobility (defined as straining angle of 30 degrees or greater relative to the horizontal on the Q-tip test) was also conducted at the same time. For Q-tip test, a sterile lubricated cotton swab was placed into the bladder through the meatus and withdrawn until resistance indicated correct positioning at urethrovesical junction. The angle between the cotton swab at rest and after maximal Valsalva maneuver in degrees was defined as the urethral mobility (measurements were taken using a protractor placed against the patient's perineum).

Exclusion criteria were previous surgery for incontinence, a history of pelvic irradiation, pelvic surgery within the previous 3 months, anterior or apical pelvic-organ prolapse beyond 1 cm proximal to the hymen (Stage II and higher of the pelvic organ prolapse quantitation system) and unfavorable factors on urodynamic testing suggestive of either intrinsic sphincter deficiency or detrusor overactivity. Written informed consent was obtained from each enrolled patient prior to their induction into the study and Ethical committee approval taken.

Finally 50 patients were recruited in the study group, all of whom underwent TOT operation. All the TOT operations done in this study were performed by a single senior surgeon thereby ensuring the same expertise across all cases. All patients across both groups were explained about the possibility of voiding dysfunction postoperatively and the need for clean intermittent self catheterisation.

Data for each patient was collected at first visit and subsequent follow-ups. Information obtained and tests performed at baseline preoperatively were age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), parity, duration of incontinence, menopausal status, past history of smoking, past history of hysterectomy/LSCS, urethral mobility, PVRU on USG, full bladder and supine empty bladder stress test, and 3 day voiding diary to measure incontinence severity.

Based on age, women were classified into 2 groups: age < 50 and age > 50 years. Patients were considered postmenopausal based on absence of menstrual bleeding for more than 12 months. History of pelvic surgery included caesarean section and hysterectomy. Urethral mobility ≥ 30º on Q-tip test was taken as the criteria for hypermobility. BMI was calculated by dividing the patient's weight by the square of height and women stratified in 2 groups: non-obese group (BMI < 25) and obese group (BMI ≥ 25) [13].

Self-reported measures included the urogenital distress inventory-6 (UDI-6) and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7). These 2 tools, UDI-6 and IIQ-7 are shortened versions of the original UDI and IIQ respectively [14,15]. They have shown promise in the assessment of health-related quality of life, symptom distress, and in distinguishing among different types of established urinary incontinence in the clinical setting.

Scoring: Item responses are assigned values of 0 for “not at all,” 1 for “slightly,” 2 for “moderately,” and 3 for “greatly.” The average score of items responded to is calculated. The average, which ranges from 0 to 3, is multiplied by 33 1/3 to put scores on a scale of 0 to 100.

Evaluation for treatment success was done at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. The primary outcome for treatment success was clinical reduction of complaints as measured with the UDI-6 and IIQ-7 (i.e., a score reduction of 70% or more) and a negative standard volume stress test at 12 months after the onset of treatment. For stress test, a full bladder standing Valsalva and cough manoeuvre was done. If the patient did not leak she was asked to repeat the manoeuvre bending the knees. A post test void of at least 300 ml was necessary for the test to be considered valid. Pre-operative clinical and demographic data were finally correlated with the above treatment outcomes to look for any statistical significance.

The statistical analysis was done using statistical software SPSS for windows (Version 16). Chi-square test was used for non-parametric variables. Student's t test was used for comparing 2 groups and one-way ANOVA test was used for multiple group comparison. P-value < 0.05 was stated as statistically significant.

Data was collected prospectively during the study period of September 2011 to August 2013. Primary outcome data was finally available for 50 women (table 1). The mean age of the whole study group was 49.8 years (range 26-72 years). There were 20 (40%) premenopausal and 30 (60%) postmenopausal patients. None of the postmenopausal patients were using any type of hormone replacement therapy. Mean parity was 2.7 (range 0-6). Average duration of incontinence was 22.9 months (range 9-78 months). Of 50 women 34 (68%) had undergone either hysterectomy or LSCS in the past. Urethral hypermobility defined as Q tip > 30 degree was present in 44 (88%) women. Five patients (10%) had a history of smoking. Of the 50 patients, 24 (48%) were normal-weight women and 26 (52%) were obese women.

Table 1

Baseline demographic & clinical characteristics of the patients

Baseline demographic & clinical characteristics of the patients
Baseline demographic & clinical characteristics of the patients

We compared outcome success rate by evaluating the success criteria of 70% reduction in UDI and IIQ scores, mean change in these scores at 6, 12 months and provocative stress test at 12 months.

There was a tendency for premenopausal women to have a higher success rate that was statistically significant (each p < 0.05) (table 2). At 6 months, 70% reduction in UDI and IIQ scores was significant in the “premenopausal” group at 95 and 90% respectively compared to only 70 and 53.3% respectively in the “postmenopausal” group (p = 0.005, 0.001). Similarly change in UDI and IIQ scores were -49.2 and -24.9 respectively in the “premenopausal” group compared to -40.8 and -19.1 respectively in the “postmenopausal” group (p = 0.01). At 12 months follow-up, there were mild changes in all outcome variables and p values were similarly significant here for all the treatment outcomes in the 2 evaluation groups. The “premenopausal” group had no positive provocative stress test at 1 year in comparison to 6.7% in the “postmenopausal” group (p < 0.001).

Table 2

Efficacy of TOT procedure stratified by patients' menopausal status

Efficacy of TOT procedure stratified by patients' menopausal status
Efficacy of TOT procedure stratified by patients' menopausal status

Similarly, statistically significant difference was observed between patients below and at or above 50 years of age in terms of success rate with younger patients faring better (each p < 0.05) (table 3). Past history of hysterectomy/LSCS was associated with poorer treatment outcomes (each p < 0.05 except for positive provocative stress test at 12 months) (table 4). Urethral hypermobility positively influenced the success rate with better outcomes (each p < 0.05) (table 5). On the other hand, history of smoking had no bearing over success rate (each p > 0.05) (table 6). Our results also indicate that there is no statistically significant correlation between BMI and clinical outcomes of sling surgery (each p > 0.05) (table 7).

Table 3

Efficacy of TOT procedure stratified by patients' Age

Efficacy of TOT procedure stratified by patients' Age
Efficacy of TOT procedure stratified by patients' Age
Table 4

Efficacy of TOT procedure stratified by history of pelvic surgery (hysterectomy/LSCS)

Efficacy of TOT procedure stratified by history of pelvic surgery (hysterectomy/LSCS)
Efficacy of TOT procedure stratified by history of pelvic surgery (hysterectomy/LSCS)
Table 5

Efficacy of TOT procedure stratified by patients' urethral mobility

Efficacy of TOT procedure stratified by patients' urethral mobility
Efficacy of TOT procedure stratified by patients' urethral mobility
Table 6

Efficacy of TOT procedure stratified by history of smoking

Efficacy of TOT procedure stratified by history of smoking
Efficacy of TOT procedure stratified by history of smoking
Table 7

Efficacy of TOT procedure stratified by patients' BMI

Efficacy of TOT procedure stratified by patients' BMI
Efficacy of TOT procedure stratified by patients' BMI

SUI has been shown to cause deterioration in quality of life, limitations in social relationships, and a higher prevalence of psychological morbidity. It tends to occur mainly because of loss of urethral support with advancing age and with increasing parity. This support can be regained by surgical interventions such as TOT. Multiple factors can affect pelvic relaxation and thereby increase chances of the patient developing SUI. Gürel et al. [16] found that age, marriage period, and parity are directly and strongly related to pelvic relaxation.

It is well known that the prevalence of SUI increases with aging in women owing to menopause and the loss of estrogen. The only study that investigated the relationship between the success of TOT operations and menopause was reported in 2010 by Rechberger et al. [17]. The authors found that the clinical effectiveness of surgical SUI treatment did not depend on the patient's BMI or type of midurethral sling, but that menopausal status and aging significantly influenced the outcome of the surgery. They also concluded that both menopause and aging had a detrimental influence on the final outcome of both the retropubic and transobturator sling procedure. In our study, we confirmed the results of Rechberger et al. [17]. It is well known that estrogen and progesterone receptors have been found throughout the lower urinary tract [11], and many of the tissues involved in female continence have been found to be estrogen-sensitive, such as the urethra and bladder. Because estrogens are also known to have an effect on the synthesis of collagen and the metabolism of collagen in the lower genital tract, the significant difference that we found between pre- and post-menopausal patients is likely related to the loss of estrogen support of urogenital tissues [18].

Higher age has also been described as an important risk factor for developing SUI in previous literature [19,20,21,22]. In a study by Anger et al. [23], at 1 year after surgery, overall outcomes in younger women (aged 65-74 years) were significantly better than in older women (aged > 75 years) with respect to postoperative urge incontinence (20.0 vs. 12.6%), treatment failure (10.5 vs. 7.2%), and outlet obstruction (10.5 vs. 6.6%). They concluded that women aged 75 and older are more likely to experience postoperative urge incontinence, treatment failure, and outlet obstruction after sling surgery.

Obstetric procedures such as hysterectomy/LSCS could increase the risk of SUI by damaging anatomical structures involved in urethral support or the innervation of the urethral sphincter. This damage can be caused by direct surgical trauma or by trauma due to stretching or compression of the tissue [24]. In line with this, our study showed that patients with a prior history of either hysterectomy or LSCS had worse surgical outcomes.

Minaglia et al. [25] and Karateke et al. [26] found that low urethral mobility was associated with higher rates of postoperative incontinence. Paick et al. [27] on the other hand stated that cure rates were not significantly lower in the group without a mobile urethra (< 30º). Theoretically, a successful sling procedure restores continence not by increasing resting urethral pressure but by providing a support the holds the mid-urethra in place while the proximal urethra descends under stress, allowing better pressure transmission and, more importantly, a kinking of urethra during straining [28,29]. When urethra doesn't move well, this kinking does not occur. That's the advocated mechanism for urethral mobility as a prognostic factor. True to this, urethral mobility was found to be an important prognostic factor for TOT surgery in our study.

Studies by Hannestad et al. [30] and Bump et al. [31] have shown the relative risk of SUI to be between 1.8 and 2.92 for current smokers. Whether by direct effect such as bladder irritation or indirectly through smoking-related illnesses that cause increased coughing, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, smoking appears to have a striking causal relationship with SUI. In our study though, no significant differences were seen on comparing the treatment outcomes after surgery in the 2 groups of smokers and non-smokers.

Higher intra-abdominal pressures have been observed in patients with greater BMI, and this may stress the pelvic floor secondary to a chronic state of increased pressure [32]. Increased intra-abdominal pressure elevates pressure at maximum cystometric capacity, and decreases cough pressure transmission from the bladder to the urethra, as well as decreasing Valsava leak point pressure, which may contribute to the development of SUI in obese patients [9]. Obesity-induced neurogenic effects on the pelvic floor may also contribute to the development of urge or urge incontinence [33]. Only 2 studies so far have been reported for the relationship of obesity and TOT outcomes. Rechberger et al. [17] conducted 269 retropubic and 268 transobturator sling procedures and demonstrated that BMI does not influence the clinical effectiveness of SUI treatment. Similarly in the study by Esin et al. [34], there were no significant differences between obese (BMI > 30) and non-obese groups (BMI < 25) in terms of urodynamic parameters, objective cure rate and subjective success, quality of life scores, or postoperative complications. They concluded that BMI does not affect the clinical effectiveness of TOT operation in the treatment of female SUI or mixed urinary incontinence. These findings are consistent with our results. Our study has also revealed that obese SUI patients had no differences in surgical outcomes compared to non-obese patients. TOT surgery can be performed in obese patients with expectations of good treatment outcomes.

In conclusion, the TOT procedure appears to be more effective in premenopausal women, women aged < 50 years, women without history of hysterectomy/LSCS, and presence of urethral hypermobility > 30 degrees. On the other hand, outcomes do not appear to be influenced by the patient's BMI or smoking status. Further prospective, randomized, controlled studies on a larger number of patients are needed to clearly identify factors that would raise the success rate of TOT procedure.

1.
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A: The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:116-26.
2.
Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S: A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:1150-1157.
3.
Delorme E: Transobturator urethral suspension: mini- invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol 2001;11:1306-1313.
4.
Parazzini F, Colli E, Origgi G, Surace M, Bianchi M, Benzi G, Artibani W: Risk factors for urinary incontinence in women. Eur Urol 2000;37:637-643.
5.
Park YK: Female stress urinary incontinence. J Korean Continence Soc 2008;12:1-9.
6.
Norton P, Brubaker L: Urinary incontinence in women. Lancet 2006;367:57-67.
7.
O'Sullivan DC, Chilton CP, Munson KW: Should Stamey colposuspension be our primary surgery for stress incontinence? Br J Urol 1995;75:457-460.
8.
Rafii A, Darai E, Haab F, Samain E, Levardon M, Deval B: Body mass index and outcome of tension-free vaginal tape. Eur Urol 2003;43:288-292.
9.
Killingsworth LB, Wheeler TL, Burgio KL, Martirosian TE, Redden DT, Richter HE: One-year outcomes of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) mid-urethral slings in overweight and obese women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009;20:1103-1108.
10.
Ku JH, Oh JG, Shin JW, Yang JH, Kim SW, Paick JS: Outcome of mid-urethral sling procedures in Korean women with stress urinary incontinence according to body-mass index. J Korean Continence Soc 2005;9:28-33.
11.
Iosif CS, Batra S, Ek A, Astedt B: Estrogen receptors in the human female lower urinary tract. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;141:817-820.
12.
Smith P: Estrogens and the urogenital tract. Studies on steroid hormone receptors and clinical study on a new estradiol-releasing vaginal ring. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 1993;157:1-26.
13.
WHO Expert Consultation: Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004;363:157-163.
14.
Schumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA: Health related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Qual Life Res 1994;3:291-306.
15.
Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McClish DK, Fantl JA: Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol Urodyn 1995;14:131-139.
16.
Gürel H, Gürel SA: Pelvic relaxation and associated risk factors: the results of logistic regression analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:290-293.
17.
Rechberger T, Futyma K, Jankiewicz K, Adamiak A, Bogusiewicz M, Skorupski P: Body mass index does not influence the outcome of anti-incontinence surgery among women whereas menopausal status and ageing do: a randomised trial. Int Urogynecol J 2010;21:801-806.
18.
Robinson D, Cardozo LD: The role of estrogens in female lower urinary tract dysfunction. Urology 2003;62(4 Suppl 1):45-51.
19.
Hampel C, Artibani W, Espuna PM, Haab F, Jackson S, Romero J, Gavart S, Papanicolaou S: Understanding the burden of stress urinary incontinence in Europe: a qualitative review of the literature. Eur Urol 2004;46:15-27.
20.
Minassian VA, Stewart WF, Wood GC: Urinary incontinence in women: variation in prevalence estimates and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:324-331.
21.
Parazzini F, Chiaffarino F, Lavezzari M, Giambanco V: Risk factors for stress, urge or mixed urinary incontinence in Italy. BJOG 2003;110:927-933.
22.
Thom DH, Van den Eeden SK, Brown JS: Evaluation of parturition and other reproductive variables as risk factors for urinary incontinence in later life. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90:983-989.
23.
Anger JT, Litwin MS, Wang Q, Pashos CL, Rodríguez LV: The effect of age on outcomes of sling surgery for urinary incontinence. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55:1927-1231.
24.
Parys BT, Haylen BT, Hutton JL, Parsons KF: The effects of simple hysterectomy on vesicourethral function. Br J Urol 1989;64:594-599.
25.
Minaglia S, Urwitz-Lane R, Wong M, Ozel B: Effectiveness of transobturator tape in women with decreased urethral mobility. J Reprod Med 2009;54:15-19.
26.
Karateke A, Haliloglu B, Cam C, Sakalli M: Comparison of TVT and TVT-O in patients with stress urinary incontinence: short-term cure rates and factors influencing the outcome. A prospective randomised study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;49:99-105.
27.
Paick JS, Cho MC, Oh SJ, Kim SW, Ku JH: Is proximal urethral mobility important for transobturator tape procedure in management of female patients with stress urinary incontinence? Urology 2007;70:246-250.
28.
Kobashi KC: What is the relationship between the transobturator tape procedure and urethral mobility in women with SUI? Nat Clin Pract Urol 2008;5:242-243.
29.
Lo TS, Horng SG, Liang CC, Lee SJ, Soong YK: Ultrasound assessment of mid-urethra tape at three-year follow-up after tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Urology 2004;63: 671-675.
30.
Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Daltveit AK, Hunskaar S: Are smoking and other lifestyle factors associated with female urinary incontinence? The Norwegian EPINCONT Study. BJOG 2003;110:247-254.
31.
Bump RC, McClish DK: Cigarette smoking and urinary incontinence in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:1213-1218.
32.
Noblett KL, Jensen JK, Ostergard DR: The relationship of body mass index to intra-abdominal pres sure as measured by multichannel cystometry. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1997;8:323-326.
33.
Richter HE, Creasman JM, Myers DL, Wheeler TL, Burgio KL, Subak LL: Urodynamic characterization of obese women with urinary incontinence undergoing a weight loss program: the Program to Reduce Incontinence by Diet and Exercise (PRIDE) trial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008;19: 1653-1658.
34.
Esin S, Salman MC, Ozyuncu O, Durukan T: Surgical outcome of transobturator tape procedure in obese and non-obese women. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;31:645-649.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.