Penile fracture is a very rare urological emergency resulting from traumatic rupture of the tunica albuginea of one or both corpora cavernosa, usually during sexual intercourse. Immediate surgical treatment is the current standard of care with lower risks of late complications, including erectile dysfunction, penile curvature, and tunical scar formation. We, hereby, report an over delayed presentation (23 days) of a penile fracture, which was successfully managed surgically. Our case emphasizes on the fact that there are not any “lost” cases and surgical treatment should always be offered to penile fracture, independently of delayed presentation.

Penile fracture is a very rare or, probably, a rarely reported urological emergency. It occurs after traumatic rupture of the tunica albuginea of one or both corpora cavernosa, due to twisting or bending of the penile shaft during erection [1]. Rupture may extend to the corpus spongiosum and the urethra [2]. Incidence and etiology of penile fracture varies considerably within different geographic areas. In 2002, Eke [3] reported 1,642 cases worldwide with 745 (56%) coming from the Mediterranean region. In Western European countries, the injury typically occurs during sexual intercourse while in the Middle Eastern countries, the most frequent cause is reported to be forceful manipulation (65%) [4]. The diagnosis is clinical, however, a Doppler ultrasound or an MRI may be useful sometimes. Immediate surgical repair is the current standard of care with lower risks of complications, including erectile dysfunction, penile curvature, and tunical scar formation, compared to conservative management or delayed repair [5,6].

Here we present an over delayed surgical treatment of penile fracture during intercourse.

A 42-year-old patient presented to his local hospital emergency department complaining of penile injury during intercourse. He was admitted to the urology department with the diagnosis of penile fracture and was treated conservatively with ice packs, compression, antibiotics and anti-inflammatory. He was discharged after 9 days and visited a private urologist who confirmed the diagnosis with MRI and consulted the patient to prompt surgical repair.

The patient was operated in our hospital 23 days after the injury. Surgical exploration, after degloving the penis, revealed a 2-cm defect in the left corpus cavernosum, with an associated peri-cavernosal hematoma (Fig. 1, 2). The right corpus cavernosum and the urethra were intact. The hematoma was evacuated, and the defect was repaired with a 2-0 vicryl continuous inverting sutures.

The patient had an uneventful postoperative period and was advised to have his first sexual intercourse at 2 months. At 4-month, 12-month and 24-month follow-ups, the patient had no signs of erectile dysfunction, pain or deformity during erection.

Penile fracture is known as the rupture of tunica albuginea of the corpus cavernosum while the penis is in the erect condition. The tunica albuginea is among the toughest of body fascias. It measures 2 mm in a flaccid penis and gets thinned out to 0.25 mm during erection [3]. It is considered as a rare urological emergency, rather highly underreported, due to the embarrassing nature of the condition.

Earlier studies favored conservative treatment for the traumatic rupture of the penis. However, due to the 10-30% of patients who, afterwards, experienced penile deformity, suboptimal erections and coitus difficulty, conservative management is the exception than the rule nowadays [7]. The World Health Organization is very clear on that: “all acute injuries to the tunica albuginea ought to be repaired immediately by surgical intervention”. Immediate surgical repair means within the first hours after the trauma. A large multicenter European study showed that delaying surgical intervention results in significantly impaired erectile function [4]. There is important data in the literature; on the other hand, that definitive therapy with excellent results is still possible after a considerable time period passed from the trauma without any increase in long-term complications [8,9,10].

Our patient presented 23 days after his trauma and, although we considered that long time as a contraindication for surgical repair, we proceeded in the operation. Patient's perfect condition 2 years after, justified our choice. We were not able to indentify case reports in the literature with such long delay for surgical treatment and consequent successful outcome. That case shows that there are not any “lost” cases and surgical treatment should always be offered to penile fracture, independently of delayed presentation.

Orvis BR, McAninch JW: Penile rupture. Urol Clin North Am 1989;16:369-375.
Moslemi MK: Evaluation of epidemiology, concomitant urethral disruption and seasonal variation of penile fracture: a report of 86 cases. Can Urol Assoc J 2013;7:E572-575.
Eke N: Fracture of the penis. Br J Surg 2002; 89:555-565.
Bozzini G, Albersen M, Otero JR, Margreiter M, Cruz EG, Mueller A, Gratzke C, Serefoglu EC, Salamanca JI, Verze P: Delaying surgical treatment of penile fracture results in poor functional outcomes: results from a large retrospective rulticenter European study. Eur Urol Focus 2017;3.
Bella AJ, Shamloul R: Addressing the barriers to optimal management of penile fracture. Can Urol Assoc J 2013;7:258-259.
Yamacake KGR, Tavares A, Padovani GP, Guglielmetti GB, Cury J, Srougi M: Longterm treatment outcomes between surgical correction and conservative management for penile fracture: Retrospective analysis. Korean J Urol 2013;54:472-476.
Nicolaisen GS, Melamud A, Williams RD, McAninch JW: Rupture of the corpus cavernosum: surgical management. J Urol 1983; 130:917-919.
Cummings JM, Parra RO, Boullier JA: Delayed repair of penile fracture. J Trauma 1998;45:153-154.
Kozacioglu Z, Degirmenci T, Arslan M, Yuksel MB, Gunlusoy B, Minareci S: Long-term significance of the number of hours until surgical repair of penile fractures. Urol Int 2011; 87:75-79.
el-Assmy A, el-Tholoth HS, Mohsen T, Ibrahiem eI-HI: Does timing of presentation of penile fracture affect outcome of surgical intervention? Urology 2011;77:1388-1392.
Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes as well as any distribution of modified material requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.