Introduction: Surgical never events are preventable harmful non-intentional human errors. Urology is a common surgical specialty for their occurrence. Patients and Methods: A retrospective search of our center's data was done during the period 2006-2016 for surgical never events. Each included case was studied for the primary diagnosis, procedure, and subspecialty, never event type and timing, needed extra-interventions, urologist/procedure proportioning, outcomes, and possible underlying causes of the event. Results: Of more than 55,000 different urological interventions, 61 patients were involved in never events. Wrong procedures represented 75% of the never events, and endourology and urolithiasis subspecialties were more often involved. The main detectable underlying factor was the disproportion between the levels of the procedure class and the qualification of the urologist (41%). Thirty-four cases had extra-procedures. The short-term harm effect represented the final outcome in 42% of all events. Death, permanent organ loss, and long-term harm represented 20, 15, and 23%, respectively. Conclusion: Urological surgical never events are rare, but their final outcomes could be catastrophic, even leading to death.

1.
Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals (CAMH) Update; Sentinel events. 2016 Jan. Available at: http://www.jointcommission.org. Accessed 11 Jan. 2017, p20.
2.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213.
3.
Eke N: Urological complications of abdominal surgery. J West Afr Coll Surg 2013;3:9- 12.
4.
Algie CM, MR, Wasiak J, Batty L, Gruen RL, Mahar PD: Interventions for reducing wrong-site surgery and invasive clinical procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015: CD009404.
5.
Makar A, Kodera A, Bhayani SB: Never events in surgery. Eur Urol 2015;68:919-920.
6.
National Quality Forum (NQF): Serious reportable events in healthcare-2011 update: A consensus report. Available at: www.qualityforum.org. Accessed 2017 Jan 4, Washington, DC, USA.
7.
Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP, Herbosa T, Joseph S, Kibatala PL, Lapitan MC, Merry AF, Moorthy K, Reznick RK, Taylor B, Gawande AA: A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009;360:491-499.
8.
Thiels CA, Lal TM, Nienow JM, Pasupathy KS, Blocker RC, Aho JM, Morgenthaler TI, Cima RR, Hallbeck S, Bingener J: Surgical never events and contributing human factors. Surgery 2015;158:515-521.
9.
Seiden S, Barach P: Wrong-side/wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and wrong-patient adverse events: are they preventable? Arch Surg 2006;141:931-939.
10.
Watterson J, Mahoney JE, Futter NG, Gaffield J: Iatrogenic ureteric injuries: approaches to etiology and management. Can J Surg 1998;41:379-382.
11.
Eke N: Iatrogenic urological trauma: a 10-year experience from Port Harcourt. West Afr J Med 2000;19:246-249.
12.
Hanchanale V, Rao AR, Motiwala H, Karim OM: Wrong site surgery! How can we stop it? Urol Ann 2014;6:57-62.
13.
Alleemudder A, King P, Mehta S: Point of technique: reducing wrong-side errors for endourology procedures. Urology 2014;84: 1541-1543.
14.
Challacombe B, Dasgupta P, Amoroso P, Kirby R: Wrong-side/site surgery. Trend Urol Men Health 2011;2:32-34.
15.
Elderwy A, Kurkar A, Hussein A, Abozeid H, Hammodda HM, Ibraheim AF: Dissolution therapy versus shock wave lithotripsy for radiolucent renal stones in children: a prospective study. J Urol 2014;191(5 Suppl): 1491-1495.
16.
Al-Kohlany K, Shokeir AA, Mosbah A, Mohsen T, Shoma AM, Eraky I, El-Kenawy M, El-Kappany HA: Treatment of complete staghorn stones: a prospective randomized comparison of open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 2005;173: 469-473.
17.
Carayon P, Schultz K, Hundt AS: Righting wrong site surgery. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 2004;30:405-410.
18.
Hempel S, Maggard-Gibbons M, Nguyen DK, Dawes AJ, Miake-Lye I, Beroes JM, Booth MJ, Miles JN, Shanman R, Shekelle PG: Wrong-site surgery, retained surgical items, and surgical fires: a systematic review of surgical never nvents. JAMA Surg 2015; 150:796-805.
19.
Watson DS: Concept analysis: wrong-site surgery. AORN J 2015;101:650-656.
20.
McAlister VC: Catastrophe surgery: response to multiple casualties or individual patients with devastating injuries. Can J Surg 2009; 52:175-176.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.