Introduction: Members of the carbonic anhydrase gene family, responsible for the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide, participate in several important biological processes including processes involved in fertilization. CAIV has been shown to play a role in sperm cell capacitation and regulation of sperm motility and is present in mature murine placentae. The present study specifically analyzes the distribution of CAIV in female reproductive organs and during early placenta development. Methods: Immunostaining for CAIV was performed on female reproductive organs (ovary, fallopian tube, uterus, vagina) of nonpregnant mice and on implantation sites of early pregnancy between 4.5 and 9.5 days post-coitum (dpc). Sex typing of embryos was performed by PCR using three separated gene combinations for X and Y chromosomes, respectively. Additionally, reproductive outcome of CAIV-deficient mice was determined. Results: CAIV is largely absent in the female reproductive organs of nonpregnant mice. Immunostaining for CAIV was present in the blastocyst and in consecutive stages of the developing embryo. In the endometrial epithelium distant from the implantation chamber, CAIV is induced from 8.5 dpc onward. Moreover, the yolk sac epithelium, the trophoblast giant cells, and the labyrinthine compartment of the developing hemochorial placenta show a strong immunostaining for CAIV. In heterozygous mating, the number of CAIV knockout pups is significantly reduced than was to be expected according to the mendelian rules, while homozygous mating of CAIV knockout mice results in a significant reduction of litter size, which is mainly due to a reduced number of female mice born. Since at 9.5 dpc the number of female embryos is rather higher than that of males, the observed reduction of female offspring appears to be due to a defect in placentation after 9.5 dpc. Conclusion: Thus, CAIV seems to be involved in the signaling network of embryo development, implantation, and placentation.

The implantation of the mammalian embryo is a complex process [1]. During the initial phases of pregnancy in mammals, the interaction between the uterus and the embryo is of high importance for ensuring the embryo’s successful implantation and subsequent development. Morphological and physiological alterations within the endometrium, including processes like the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and decidualization, are under control of ovarian steroids, namely, estrogen and progesterone [2]. This interaction is very susceptible to disruption and about 20% of pregnancies in human end at the time of implantation [3]. To maintain the nutrition of the developing embryo, development of a placenta is of outmost importance. The specialized cells required for placental development such as trophoblast and extraembryonic mesoderm are formed during the early stages of embryonic development. Therefore, the precise understanding of the molecular interactions leading to successful embryo implantation and placentation is considered essential from a clinical point of view [4].

The mouse is widely used as an animal model as it is well suited for reproductive studies. As in humans, uterine receptivity for implantation lasts for a limited time, and the decidual reaction only occurs in a uterus appropriately primed with progesterone and estrogen. However, in contrast to humans, physiological decidualization in mice is only induced in the presence of a blastocyst. The feto-maternal interaction of the embryonic trophoblast with the maternal decidua is indispensable for regular embryogenesis as well as adequate placenta formation. This interaction is orchestrated by highly complex and finely tuned molecular and cellular processes, which are regulated by multiple factors [5, 6]. Extending our knowledge of these complex events is indispensable to prevent infertility caused by implantation failure.

Carbonic anhydrases (CAs) are zinc enzymes that catalyze the conversion of CO2 into the soluble hydrogen carbonate HCO3 [7] and play a crucial role in regulation of carbon dioxide concentrations throughout the body. The activity of the enzymes is dependent on both their abundance and the pH level [8]. At least 16 different isozymes of CAs have been found in mammals [9]. Cellular localization can be divided into cytosolic (CA I, II, III, VII, and XIII), membrane-bound (CA IV, IX, XII, XIV, and XV), mitochondrial (CA VA and VB), and salivary secreted (CAVI) forms [8]. The majority of these isozymes are generated by various members of a gene family that appears to be evolved from a common precursor through gene duplication. CAIV has been identified previously as a key enzyme for the early activation of sperm motility [10]. The function of CAs includes pH-regulating processes that are essential for sperm storage, motility, and capacitation during fertilization [11]. Moreover, CAIV expression has been shown in various tissues including lung, heart, muscles, liver, brain, kidney, gallbladder, distal intestine, placenta, and specialized capillaries [12‒19]. Unlike other isoenzymes, CAIV is attached extracellularly to the plasma membrane by a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol anchor, in contrast to a membrane-spanning domain, and plays an active role in mediating the transport of CO2 and HCO3 [18]. Thus, it may be involved in maintaining proper homeostasis and may be also associated with the blood-brain barrier in cerebral capillaries [20]. Because of these properties, CAIV may also play an essential role in placental function and embryo development. During embryo development, regulation of CAIV previously has been analyzed in late murine pregnancy on gestational days 11, 15, and 19. CAIV protein has been localized in the endodermal layer of the yolk sac (both intra- and extraplacental) and in the uterine epithelium but was mostly expressed in the labyrinth, at the interface between fetal capillaries and maternal blood, and increased with gestation [21]. Yet there is no information on the distribution of CAIV at the time of implantation and during early embryonic and placental development. Moreover, deletion of CAIV resulted in reduced litter size, which preferentially affected female offspring [22]. However, it was not clear from this study at what time the loss of the embryos, mainly female embryos, took place. The aim of the present study thus was to analyze the distribution of the CAIV protein in early stages of pregnancy and placenta development from 4.5 to 9.5 dpc and to determine the time span in which intrauterine loss of the embryos occurs.

Animals

C57Bl/6J wild-type mice were bred in the animal facility of the University Hospital Essen. CAIV knockout B6.129S1-Car4tm1Sly/J mice were provided by the laboratory of William S. Sly (Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA) [22]. Mice were maintained at a 12-h light/dark cycle and had free access to tap water and food. As only organs were removed for the investigations and no animal experiments were carried out, approval by the local Ethics Committee was not necessary (ethics approval waiver was granted). The mice were treated in accordance with guidelines approved by the University of Duisburg-Essen Animal Care and Use Committees as well as the State Office for Nature, Environment and Consumer Protection of North Rhine-Westphalia (LANUV, protocol 84-02.04.2014.A219; address: Leibnizstrasse 10, 45659 Recklinghausen, Germany) before the start of the investigations. Institutional animal care facility was the Zentrales Tierlaboratorium (ZTL; Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147 Essen, Germany). Animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation.

Collection of Tissue Samples

Female reproductive organs of nonpregnant mice were obtained from the estrous phase of the ovarian cycle. Cycle monitoring was performed by microscopic evaluation of vaginal smear. For analysis of implantation sites and embryos, female mice were mated overnight with males, and the day of vaginal plug finding was defined as day 0.5 of pregnancy (dpc). Mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation. After dissection, tissues were fixed overnight with formaldehyde (4%), dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. In total, 29 mice were sacrificed in this study. For immunohistochemical evaluation, organs from three different female nonpregnant wild-type mice and implantation sites of at least three different mice of each of the six pregnancy stages investigated (4.5–9.5 dpc) were analyzed. For assignment of number of implantation chambers and sex determination of embryos, uteri of three pregnant heterozygous and five pregnant CAIV knockout mice were dissected at 9.5 dpc.

Histology and Immunohistochemistry

C57Bl/6J wild-type mice were used to analyze the localization of CAIV in the female reproductive tract and in embryos by immunoperoxidase method. Briefly, 7-μm-thick paraffin sections were deparaffinized in xylol and rehydrated in ethanol of decreasing concentrations. After rinsing in distilled water, slices were blocked with PBS-glucose-oxidase buffer and incubated with a polyclonal goat IgG antibody against CAIV (AF2414; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) (1:100 in PBS/5% BSA) overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with biotinylated anti-goat IgG (1:200 in PBS/5% BSA) for 30 min at room temperature. The VECTASTAIN® Elite ABC kit for peroxidase (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) was used for signal enhancement according to the protocol of the manufacturer. Detection was carried out with 3,3′diaminobenzidine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) as chromogen. Nuclear staining was performed with hematoxylin (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany). After staining, slides were dehydrated in ethanol of raising concentrations and embedded in Eukitt® (Sigma). Negative controls were performed by using an unspecific serum instead of the primary antibody on consecutive sections. Murine renal tissue was used as a positive control. Morphology of implantation sites was examined using hematoxylin and eosin-stained paraffin section. Hematoxylin-eosin staining was performed according to standard protocols. All slides were examined with a Leica DM4000 (Leica, Nussloch, Germany) microscope.

Sex Determination of Early Embryos

For sex determination of implanted embryos, 26 embryos of three different pregnant WT mice and 21 embryos of 5 different pregnant CAIV knockout mice were analyzed at day 9.5 pc. Three separated gene combinations were analyzed: X-chromosomal Xlr (X-linked lymphocyte-regulated complex) and Y-chromosomal Sly (Sycp3-like Y-linked), the homologous genes Uba1 and Ube1y1 on the X and Y chromosome, and Y-chromosomal Zfy (zinc finger protein Y-linked) have been amplified by PCR. In brief, 30-μm sections of embedded uteri from pregnant mice were prepared and microdissected to exclude maternal uterus tissue. For this purpose, embryonic tissue was isolated under microscopic control from 10 paraffin sections (thickness 30 μm) of each embryo using a scalpel and was transferred to an Eppendorf vial. Genomic DNA then was isolated from the embryonic tissues using ReliaPrep FFPE gDNA Miniprep System (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCRs were performed in a final volume of 25 μL containing 500 ng genomic DNA using standard PCR protocol as follows: 94°C for 2 min followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 57°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s. PCR products were subsequently separated on a 2% agarose gel containing GelRed® Nucleic Acid Gel Stain (Biotium Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) and were visualized by ultraviolet light. PCR products: Sly/Xlr PCR showed amplicons of 480/650 bp for XX and 280 bp for XY, Uba/Ube PCR 200 bp for XX and 180 bp for XY, Zfy PCR 190 bp for XY. Primer sequences are listed in online supplementary Table S1 (for all online suppl. material, see https://doi.org/10.1159/000544000) and one representative agarose gel is shown in online supplementary Figure SF1.

Statistics

For the examination of significances, Student’s t test was used. Probability values of ≤0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

CAIV in the Nonpregnant Female Reproductive Organs

To show whether CAIV is consecutively expressed in the female reproductive tract, immunostaining with an antibody directed against CAIV was performed on mice ovaries (Fig. 1a–d), fallopian tubes (Fig. 1e, f), uteri (Fig. 1g), and vaginal tissue (Fig. 1h) of three different wild-type mice. Murine renal tissue served as a positive control (Fig. 1i). In the nonpregnant state, no immunostaining for CAIV is visible in the ovary (different follicle states and corpus luteum), the fallopian tube, and the vagina. In the uterus, we detect a slight staining in small vessels of the endometrium, whereas the uterine epithelium and the stromal cells exhibit no immunoreactivity.

Fig. 1.

CAIV immunostaining of reproductive organs in nonpregnant mice. a–d Ovary. No immunostaining is visible in the mullerian epithelium (ME in a), ovarian stroma (S in a), primordial follicles (arrow in a), primary follicles (* in b), secondary follicles (SF in b), tertiary follicles (c), and corpora lutea (d). e, f Fallopian tube. Neither in the ampulla (e) nor in the isthmus (f) is CAIV immunostaining observed in the epithelium (Ep) and musculature (M). In the uterus (g), endometrial capillaries were CAIV immunoreactive (insert in g), while no staining is visible in the endometrial epithelium (Ep) and the endometrial stromal cells (S). h Vagina. In the vaginal tissue, no CAIV-immunoreactive cells are observed in the epithelium (Ep) or in the stroma (S). i In kidney as positive control, a strong CAIV signal is visible in tubular epithelium while the negative control of the endometrium (j) shows no immunostaining (counterstaining with hematoxylin). Bar, 50 μm.

Fig. 1.

CAIV immunostaining of reproductive organs in nonpregnant mice. a–d Ovary. No immunostaining is visible in the mullerian epithelium (ME in a), ovarian stroma (S in a), primordial follicles (arrow in a), primary follicles (* in b), secondary follicles (SF in b), tertiary follicles (c), and corpora lutea (d). e, f Fallopian tube. Neither in the ampulla (e) nor in the isthmus (f) is CAIV immunostaining observed in the epithelium (Ep) and musculature (M). In the uterus (g), endometrial capillaries were CAIV immunoreactive (insert in g), while no staining is visible in the endometrial epithelium (Ep) and the endometrial stromal cells (S). h Vagina. In the vaginal tissue, no CAIV-immunoreactive cells are observed in the epithelium (Ep) or in the stroma (S). i In kidney as positive control, a strong CAIV signal is visible in tubular epithelium while the negative control of the endometrium (j) shows no immunostaining (counterstaining with hematoxylin). Bar, 50 μm.

Close modal

CAIV during Embryo Development, Implantation, and Placentation

At developmental stage 4.5 dpc, murine blastocysts from wild-type mating show a strong immunostaining for CAIV (Fig. 2a). In the pregnancy stages up to 7.5, the CAIV signal is shown in the visceral endoderm (VE) and the embryonic ectoderm (IE) (Fig. 2b–d). There is no immunoreactivity in the extraembryonic ectoderm and the ectoplacental cone. No staining of the endometrial tissue is observed. At stage 8.5 dpc (Fig. 3a–c), a strong CAIV immunostaining is visible in the amniotic epithelium lining the amniotic sac and the yolk sac epithelium (Fig. 3b). Additionally, CAIV is induced in the endometrial epithelium of the maternal compartment (Fig. 3c). At stage 9.5 dpc (Fig. 4a–h), strong immunostainings are present within the developing embryonic body, e.g., in the gut tube, the floor plate of the neural. Furthermore, the yolk sac epithelium, the trophoblast giant cells (TGC), and the endometrial epithelium, which form together the yolk sac placenta, show a strong immunostaining for CAIV. Moreover, also the labyrinthine compartment of the developing hemochorial placenta is CAIV positive. These results are summarized in Table 1.

Fig. 2.

CAIV immunostaining of mouse embryos at developmental stages 4.5 (a), 5.5 (b), 6.5 (c), and 7.5 dpc (d). CAIV immunoreactivity is visible in the blastocyst (B), the visceral endoderm (VE), and the embryonic ectoderm (IE). Corresponding negative controls (a′, b′, c′, d′) show no immunostaining. Slides are counterstained with hematoxylin. Bar, 50 μm in a, b, 100 μm in c, d, 100 μm in a′, b′, and 160 μm in c′, d′.

Fig. 2.

CAIV immunostaining of mouse embryos at developmental stages 4.5 (a), 5.5 (b), 6.5 (c), and 7.5 dpc (d). CAIV immunoreactivity is visible in the blastocyst (B), the visceral endoderm (VE), and the embryonic ectoderm (IE). Corresponding negative controls (a′, b′, c′, d′) show no immunostaining. Slides are counterstained with hematoxylin. Bar, 50 μm in a, b, 100 μm in c, d, 100 μm in a′, b′, and 160 μm in c′, d′.

Close modal
Fig. 3.

CAIV immunostaining of a representative mouse embryo at 8.5 dpc in overview (a) and in higher magnification (b, c). A strong immunoreactivity is visible in the amniotic membrane (AM), the yolk sac epithelium (Y), trophoblast giant cells (TGC), the endometrial epithelium (EE), and the developing GT of the embryo (E). Corresponding negative controls (a′, b′, c′) show no immunostaining. Slides are counterstained with hematoxylin. Bar indicates 200 μm in a and 50 μm in b, c.

Fig. 3.

CAIV immunostaining of a representative mouse embryo at 8.5 dpc in overview (a) and in higher magnification (b, c). A strong immunoreactivity is visible in the amniotic membrane (AM), the yolk sac epithelium (Y), trophoblast giant cells (TGC), the endometrial epithelium (EE), and the developing GT of the embryo (E). Corresponding negative controls (a′, b′, c′) show no immunostaining. Slides are counterstained with hematoxylin. Bar indicates 200 μm in a and 50 μm in b, c.

Close modal
Fig. 4.

CAIV immunostaining of mouse embryos at 9.5 dpc in overview (a, b) and in higher magnification (c–h). Within the developing embryo (c, d), CAIV immunostaining is visible in the gut tube (GT), the floor plate of the neural tube (FP), and the notochord (N). In placenta and extraembryonic tissues (e–h), the labyrinthine compartment (LT), the endometrial epithelium (EE), the trophoblast giant cells (TGC), and the yolk sac epithelium (Y) show immunoreactivity. The corresponding negative control (b) shows no immunostaining (counterstaining with hematoxylin). Bar = 500 μm in a, b and 50 μm in c–h.

Fig. 4.

CAIV immunostaining of mouse embryos at 9.5 dpc in overview (a, b) and in higher magnification (c–h). Within the developing embryo (c, d), CAIV immunostaining is visible in the gut tube (GT), the floor plate of the neural tube (FP), and the notochord (N). In placenta and extraembryonic tissues (e–h), the labyrinthine compartment (LT), the endometrial epithelium (EE), the trophoblast giant cells (TGC), and the yolk sac epithelium (Y) show immunoreactivity. The corresponding negative control (b) shows no immunostaining (counterstaining with hematoxylin). Bar = 500 μm in a, b and 50 μm in c–h.

Close modal
Table 1.

Localization of CAIV immunoreactivity in embryonic and maternal tissues during pregnancy

ReferencePregnancy stageEmbryoblast linageTrophoblast linageMaternal compartment
Present study 4.5 dpc 
  • Embryoblast

 
  • Polar trophoblast

 
  • Endothelium of small endometrial vessels

 
Present study 5.5 dpc 
  • VE

  • Embryonic ectoderm

 
  
Present study 6.5 dpc 
  • VE

  • Embryonic ectoderm

 
  
Present study 7.5 dpc 
  • VE

  • Embryonic ectoderm

 
  
Present study 8.5 dpc 
  • AM

  • Visceral layer of the yolk sac

  • Developing GT

 
  • TGC

 
  • EE

 
Present study 9.5 dpc 
  • Floor plate of the neural tube

  • Notochord

  • GT

 
  • TGC

  • Labyrinthine trophoblast

 
  • EE

 
Rosen et al. [21] (2001) E 11 
  • Fetal endothelial cells

  • Visceral layer of the yolk sac

 
  • Labyrinthine trophoblast

  • Trophoblast cells on Reichert's membrane

 
  • Decidua

  • EE

 
Rosen et al. [21] (2001) E 15 
  • Visceral layer of the yolk sac

 
  • Labyrinthine trophoblast

 
  • Decidua

  • EE

 
Rosen et al. [21] (2001) E 19 
  • Visceral layer of the yolk sac

 
  • Labyrinthine trophoblast

 
  • Decidua

  • EE

 
ReferencePregnancy stageEmbryoblast linageTrophoblast linageMaternal compartment
Present study 4.5 dpc 
  • Embryoblast

 
  • Polar trophoblast

 
  • Endothelium of small endometrial vessels

 
Present study 5.5 dpc 
  • VE

  • Embryonic ectoderm

 
  
Present study 6.5 dpc 
  • VE

  • Embryonic ectoderm

 
  
Present study 7.5 dpc 
  • VE

  • Embryonic ectoderm

 
  
Present study 8.5 dpc 
  • AM

  • Visceral layer of the yolk sac

  • Developing GT

 
  • TGC

 
  • EE

 
Present study 9.5 dpc 
  • Floor plate of the neural tube

  • Notochord

  • GT

 
  • TGC

  • Labyrinthine trophoblast

 
  • EE

 
Rosen et al. [21] (2001) E 11 
  • Fetal endothelial cells

  • Visceral layer of the yolk sac

 
  • Labyrinthine trophoblast

  • Trophoblast cells on Reichert's membrane

 
  • Decidua

  • EE

 
Rosen et al. [21] (2001) E 15 
  • Visceral layer of the yolk sac

 
  • Labyrinthine trophoblast

 
  • Decidua

  • EE

 
Rosen et al. [21] (2001) E 19 
  • Visceral layer of the yolk sac

 
  • Labyrinthine trophoblast

 
  • Decidua

  • EE

 

dpc, days post-coitum; E, gestational day; AM, amniotic membrane; GT, gut tube; EE, endometrial epithelium.

Non-Mendelian Sex Ratio in CAIV Knockout Mice

In comparison to heterozygous mating of wild-type and CAIV knockout mice, homozygous mating of CAIV knockout mice results in a significant reduction of litter size (Fig. 5a). In heterozygous mating, the CAIV genotype of the offspring does not follow the mendelian rules. While genotyping of pups show an enhanced number of wild-type (31% instead of 25% expected) and heterozygous genotype (62% instead of 50% expected), the number of CAIV knockout pups is significantly reduced (7% instead of 25% expected) (Fig. 5c).

Fig. 5.

Litter size and sex distribution in heterozygous and CAIV knockout mating. a Mating of CAIV knockout mice (n = 17 litters) results in a significant reduction of litter size compared to heterozygous mating (n = 31 litters). b Homozygous CAIV knockout mating results in a non-mendalian sex distribution of the 54 CAIV knockout pubs analyzed (74% male and 26% female instead of 50% each). c In heterozygous mating, the 164 pups analyzed show an enhanced number of wild-type (31% instead of 25% expected) and heterozygous genotype (62% instead of 50% expected), whereas the number of CAIV knockout pups is significantly reduced (7% instead of 25% expected). d A non-mendelian sex distribution is also observed in the 12 CAIV knockout pups (shown in c) resulting from heterozygous mating (67% male and 33% female instead of 50% each), while there is a slight preponderance of female pups in both the 50 resulting wild-type (36% male vs. 64% female) and the 102 resulting CAIV heterozygous pups (46% male vs. 54% female). e On 9.5 dpc, number of implantation chambers is similar in heterozygous (n = 3) and CAIV knockout (n = 5) mating. The sex distribution of embryos is slightly shifted to female in both experimental groups, showing a higher percentage of female embryos in heterozygous mating in total (n = 26; 40% male vs. 60% female) as well as in CAIV knockout embryos resulting from heterozygous mating (40% male vs. 60% female). f Additionally, CAIV knockout mating results in a higher percentage of female embryos on day 9.5 of pregnancy (n = 21; 43% male vs. 57% female).

Fig. 5.

Litter size and sex distribution in heterozygous and CAIV knockout mating. a Mating of CAIV knockout mice (n = 17 litters) results in a significant reduction of litter size compared to heterozygous mating (n = 31 litters). b Homozygous CAIV knockout mating results in a non-mendalian sex distribution of the 54 CAIV knockout pubs analyzed (74% male and 26% female instead of 50% each). c In heterozygous mating, the 164 pups analyzed show an enhanced number of wild-type (31% instead of 25% expected) and heterozygous genotype (62% instead of 50% expected), whereas the number of CAIV knockout pups is significantly reduced (7% instead of 25% expected). d A non-mendelian sex distribution is also observed in the 12 CAIV knockout pups (shown in c) resulting from heterozygous mating (67% male and 33% female instead of 50% each), while there is a slight preponderance of female pups in both the 50 resulting wild-type (36% male vs. 64% female) and the 102 resulting CAIV heterozygous pups (46% male vs. 54% female). e On 9.5 dpc, number of implantation chambers is similar in heterozygous (n = 3) and CAIV knockout (n = 5) mating. The sex distribution of embryos is slightly shifted to female in both experimental groups, showing a higher percentage of female embryos in heterozygous mating in total (n = 26; 40% male vs. 60% female) as well as in CAIV knockout embryos resulting from heterozygous mating (40% male vs. 60% female). f Additionally, CAIV knockout mating results in a higher percentage of female embryos on day 9.5 of pregnancy (n = 21; 43% male vs. 57% female).

Close modal

Interestingly, in CAIV knockout mice, this reduction of litter size is mainly due to a reduced number of female mice born. The sex distribution proved to be non-mendelian as 74% male and 26% female are born instead of the expected 50% each (Fig. 5b). In addition, the sex distribution from heterozygous mating (wild-type x CAIV knockout) turns out to be non-mendelian. While in both wild-type (36% male vs. 64% female) and CAIV heterozygous (46% male vs. 54% female) pups there is a slight preponderance of female pups, CAIV knockout pups resulting from heterozygous mating are 67% male versus 33% female (Fig. 5d). This reduction of litter size takes place after mid-stage gestation since on 9.5 dpc with the start of placenta development, the number of implantation chambers is similar in heterozygous and CAIV knockout mating (Fig. 5e). At this early stage on 9.5 doc, the sex distribution of embryos is rather shifted to female in both experimental groups, showing a higher percentage of female embryos from heterozygous mating in total (40% male vs. 60% female) as well as in CAIV knockout embryos resulting from heterozygous mating (40% male vs. 60% female). Likewise, CAIV knockout mating results in a higher percentage of female embryos on day 9.5 of pregnancy (43% male vs. 57% female) (Fig. 5f). Thus, the observed reduction of litter size and loss of female embryos appears to occur during the phase of placentation after 9.5 dpc.

In this study, the distribution of the CAIV protein in the female reproductive tract of nonpregnant mice and during embryo implantation and placentation from 4.5 to 9.5 dpc was analyzed. Additionally, the effect of a deletion of CAIV on these processes was evaluated in a CAIV-deficient mouse model. As to date, the distribution of the CAIV protein in the murine genital tract had not been analyzed. We here show that the CAIV protein is absent in the epithelial and the stromal cells of the organs of the female genital tract (ovary, fallopian tube, uterus, vagina) of nonpregnant mice. Only weak signals are observed in endothelial cells of the endometrium. Here, CAIV potentially could be involved in the special immune situation of the uterus since it has also been described on endothelial cells of other organs revealing an immune privilege [14, 15]. During early pregnancy, CAIV is induced in the uterine epithelium adjacent to the yolk sac from 8.5 dpc onward, complementing the observations of Rosen et al. [21] who demonstrated CAIV in the uterine epithelium of pregnancy stages from 11 dpc onward. CAIV staining of decidual cells was not observed in the early pregnancy stages analyzed in our study, thus appearing only in later pregnancy stages as described by Rosen et al. [21] for gestational day 11 and ahead. The presence of CAIV was very clearly evident in the early embryo. It was present in the embryoblast already shortly before trophoblast invasion at 4.5 dpc and extended with the progression of pregnancy to the VE and embryonic ectoderm. It was visible in the visceral layer of the yolk sac already from 8.5 dpc, supplementing the findings described before by Rosen et al. [21] from gestational day 11 onward. Thus, our results complement the studies of Rosen et al. [21] showing that CAIV is not only active in the mature placenta but also during early placental development (Table 1). We here demonstrate that during implantation, an immunostaining of CAIV is present in the blastocyst, the VE, and the embryonic ectoderm. This might be explained by the need of fine adjustment of pH in the new developing embryonic cavities filled with fluids [23]. In contrast to the findings of Rosen et al. [21], we also observed CAIV immunostaining in TGC during early pregnancy.

Yolk sac epithelium, Reichert’s membrane, TGC, and the uterine epithelium together form the yolk sac placenta, which is important to ensure the nutrition of the murine embryo during early development. The role of CAIV in this context is not yet clear and so far can only be speculated. The induction of CAIV in these compartments might support the transport function of the yolk sac placenta [21]. It is discussed that carboanhydrases like CAIV possibly can facilitate paracellular regulations by locally changing the extracellular pH value, by this controlling receptor affinities or regulating pH-dependent transporters [24, 25].

Interestingly, more CAIV-deficient male than female pups were born. This is in accordance with findings by Shah and coworkers [26], who, however, did not investigate the period during which the predominantly female embryos are lost. We here show that there is no misbalance in sex distribution during fertilization, early embryo development, and embryo implantation, but the observed misbalance in sex distribution is due to a higher death rate of female embryos during placentation after 9.5 dpc. Female-biased embryonic death has already been shown for other nonsex chromosome-associated mutations [27] but remains a largely unexplained phenomenon that requires further analysis. Taken together, we show that CAIV seems to be involved in some way in the precisely balanced signaling network of embryo development, implantation, and placentation.

The authors thank Kerstin Bahr, Natalie Knipp, and Christian von Massow for excellent technical assistance.

This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the University of Duisburg-Essen Animal Care and Use Committees as well as the State Office for Nature, Environment and Consumer Protection of North Rhine-Westphalia (LANUV, protocol 84-02.04.2014.A219; address: Leibnizstrasse 10, 45659 Recklinghausen, Germany) before the start of the investigations.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding was provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) to G.W. (WE 2344/9-3).

Conceptualization: G.W. and R.G. Data curation: S.S., J.T.D., G.W., R.G., and S.G. Funding acquisition: G.W. Project administration: G.W. Supervision: G.W. and R.G. Writing – original draft preparation: G.W., S.G., R.G., and J.T.D. Writing – review and editing: G.W., R.G., J.T.D., S.G., and S.S.

Additional Information

Current affiliation for Sven Schumann: Institute of Anatomy, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB), Neuroppin, Germany.

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and its online supplementary material files. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

1.
Schanz
A
,
Hess
A
,
Shahin
A
,
Hirchenhain
J
,
Griesinger
G
,
Krüssel
JS
.
Molekulare Mechanismen der Embryoimplantation im Endometrium
.
Der Gynäkologe
.
2004
;
37
(
2
):
123
7
.
2.
Ramathal
CY
,
Bagchi
IC
,
Taylor
RN
,
Bagchi
MK
.
Endometrial decidualization: of mice and men
.
Semin Reprod Med
.
2010
;
28
(
1
):
17
26
.
3.
Wilcox
AJ
,
Weinberg
CR
,
O’Connor
JF
,
Baird
DD
,
Schlatterer
JP
,
Canfield
RE
, et al
.
Incidence of early loss of pregnancy
.
N Engl J Med Overseas Ed
.
1988
;
319
(
4
):
189
94
.
4.
Shekibi
M
,
Heng
S
,
Nie
G
.
MicroRNAs in the regulation of endometrial receptivity for embryo implantation
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2022
;
23
(
11
):
6210
.
5.
Matsumoto
H
.
Molecular and cellular events during blastocyst implantation in the receptive uterus: clues from mouse models
.
J Reprod Dev
.
2017
;
63
(
5
):
445
54
.
6.
Bondarenko
V
,
Nikolaev
M
,
Kromm
D
,
Belousov
R
,
Wolny
A
,
Blotenburg
M
, et al
.
Embryo-uterine interaction coordinates mouse embryogenesis during implantation
.
EMBO J
.
2023
;
42
(
17
):
e113280
.
7.
Kaim
W
,
Schwederski
B
,
Chemie
B
,
Elschenbroich
C
,
Hensel
F
,
Hopf
H
, editors.
Wiesbaden
:
Vieweg+Teubner Verlag
;
1991
.
8.
Krishnamurthy
VM
,
Kaufman
GK
,
Urbach
AR
,
Gitlin
I
,
Gudiksen
KL
,
Weibel
DB
, et al
.
Carbonic anhydrase as a model for biophysical and physical-organic studies of proteins and Protein−Ligand binding
.
Chem Rev
.
2008
;
108
(
3
):
946
1051
.
9.
Imtaiyaz Hassan
M
,
Shajee
B
,
Waheed
A
,
Ahmad
F
,
Sly
WS
.
Structure, function and applications of carbonic anhydrase isozymes
.
Bioorg Med Chem
.
2013
;
21
(
6
):
1570
82
.
10.
Wandernoth
PM
,
Raubuch
M
,
Mannowetz
N
,
Becker
HM
,
Deitmer
JW
,
Sly
WS
, et al
.
Role of carbonic anhydrase IV in the bicarbonate-mediated activation of murine and human sperm
.
PLoS One
.
2010
;
5
(
11
):
e15061
.
11.
Ekstedt
E
,
Holm
L
,
Ridderstråle
Y
.
Carbonic anhydrase in mouse testis and epididymis; transfer of isozyme IV to spermatozoa during passage
.
J Mol Histol
.
2004
;
35
(
2
):
167
73
.
12.
Fleming
RE
,
Crouch
EC
,
Ruzicka
CA
,
Sly
WS
.
Pulmonary carbonic anhydrase IV: developmental regulation and cell-specific expression in the capillary endothelium
.
Am J Physiol
.
1993
;
265
(
6 Pt 1
):
L627
35
.
13.
Fleming
RE
,
Parkkila
S
,
Parkkila
AK
,
Rajaniemi
H
,
Waheed
A
,
Sly
WS
.
Carbonic anhydrase IV expression in rat and human gastrointestinal tract regional, cellular, and subcellular localization
.
J Clin Investig
.
1995
;
96
(
6
):
2907
13
.
14.
Ghandour
MS
,
Langley
OK
,
Zhu
XL
,
Waheed
A
,
Sly
WS
.
Carbonic anhydrase IV on brain capillary endothelial cells: a marker associated with the blood-brain barrier
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
.
1992
;
89
(
15
):
6823
7
.
15.
Hageman
GS
,
Zhu
XL
,
Waheed
A
,
Sly
WS
.
Localization of carbonic anhydrase IV in a specific capillary bed of the human eye
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
.
1991
;
88
(
7
):
2716
20
.
16.
Parkkila
S
,
Parkkila
A
,
Juvonen
T
,
Waheed
A
,
Sly
WS
,
Saarnio
J
, et al
.
Membrane-bound carbonic anhydrase IV is expressed in the luminal plasma membrane of the human gallbladder epithelium
.
Hepatology
.
1996
;
24
(
5
):
1104
8
.
17.
Sender
S
,
Gros
G
,
Waheed
A
,
Hageman
GS
,
Sly
WS
.
Immunohistochemical localization of carbonic anhydrase IV in capillaries of rat and human skeletal muscle
.
J Histochem Cytochem
.
1994
;
42
(
9
):
1229
36
.
18.
Waheed
A
,
Sly
WS
.
Membrane associated carbonic anhydrase IV (CA IV): a personal and historical perspective
.
Subcell Biochem
.
2014
;
75
:
157
79
.
19.
Zhu
XL
,
Sly
WS
.
Carbonic anhydrase IV from human lung. Purification, characterization, and comparison with membrane carbonic anhydrase from human kidney
.
J Biol Chem
.
1990
;
265
(
15
):
8795
801
.
20.
Deitmer
JW
,
Theparambil
SM
,
Ruminot
I
,
Noor
SI
,
Becker
HM
.
Energy dynamics in the brain: contributions of astrocytes to metabolism and pH homeostasis
.
Front Neurosci
.
2019
;
13
:
1301
.
21.
Rosen
O
,
Suarez
C
,
Schuster
VL
,
Brion
LP
.
Expression of carbonic anhydrase IV in mouse placenta
.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol
.
2001
;
280
(
2
):
R365
75
.
22.
Shah
GN
,
Ulmasov
B
,
Waheed
A
,
Becker
T
,
Makani
S
,
Svichar
N
, et al
.
Carbonic anhydrase IV and XIV knockout mice: roles of the respective carbonic anhydrases in buffering the extracellular space in brain
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
.
2005
;
102
(
46
):
16771
6
.
23.
Lutwak-Mann
C
,
Laser
H
.
Bicarbonate content of the blastocyst fluid and carbonic anhydrase in the pregnant rabbit uterus
.
Nature
.
1954
;
173
(
4397
):
268
9
.
24.
Klier
M
,
Schuler
C
,
Halestrap
AP
,
Sly
WS
,
Deitmer
JW
,
Becker
HM
.
Transport activity of the high-affinity monocarboxylate transporter MCT2 is enhanced by extracellular carbonic anhydrase IV but not by intracellular carbonic anhydrase II
.
J Biol Chem
.
2011
;
286
(
31
):
27781
91
.
25.
Deitmer
JW
,
Theparambil
SM
,
Ruminot
I
,
Becker
HM
.
The role of membrane acid/base transporters and carbonic anhydrases for cellular pH and metabolic processes
.
Front Neurosci
.
2014
;
8
:
430
.
26.
Shah
GN
,
Ulmasov
B
,
Waheed
A
,
Becker
T
,
Makani
S
,
Svichar
N
, et al
.
Carbonic anhydrase IV and XIV knockout mice: roles of the respective carbonic anhydrases in buffering the extracellular space in brain
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
.
2005
;
102
(
46
):
16771
6
.
27.
McNairn
AJ
,
Chuang
C-H
,
Bloom
JC
,
Wallace
MD
,
Schimenti
JC
.
Female-biased embryonic death from inflammation induced by genomic instability
.
Nature
.
2019
;
567
(
7746
):
105
8
.