Sea urchin teeth grow continuously and develop a complex mineralized structure consisting of spatially separate but crystallographically aligned first stage calcitic elements of high Mg content (5–15 mol% mineral). These become cemented together by epitaxially oriented second stage very high Mg calcite (30–40 mol% mineral). In the tooth plumula, ingressing preodontoblasts create layered cellular syncytia. Mineral deposits develop within membrane-bound compartments between cellular syncytial layers. We seek to understand how this complex tooth architecture is developed, how individual crystalline calcitic elements become crystallographically aligned, and how their Mg composition is regulated. Synchrotron microbeam X-ray scattering was performed on live, freshly dissected teeth. We observed that the initial diffracting crystals lie within independent syncytial spaces in the plumula. These diffraction patterns match those of mature tooth calcite. Thus, the spatially separate crystallites grow with the same crystallographic orientation seen in the mature tooth. Mineral-related proteins from regions with differing Mg contents were isolated, sequenced, and characterized. A tooth cDNA library was constructed, and selected matrix-related proteins were cloned. Antibodies were prepared and used for immunolocaliztion. Matrix-related proteins are acidic, phosphorylated, and associated with the syncytial membranes. Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy of various crystal elements shows unique amino acid, Mg, and Ca ion distributions. High and very high Mg calcites differ in Asp content. Matrix-related proteins are phosphorylated. Very high Mg calcite is associated with Asp-rich protein, and it is restricted to the second stage mineral. Thus, the composition at each part of the tooth is related to architecture and function.

Keywords:
Echinoderm tooth structure, Magnesium calcite, high, very high, Syncytial proteins
1.
Alvares, K., S.N. Dixit, J. Barss, E. Lux, A. Veis (2007) The proteome of the developing tooth of the sea urchin, Lytechinus variegatus: mortalin is a constituent of the developing cell syncytium. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 308B: 357–370.
2.
Alvares, K., S.N. Dixit, E. Lux, A. Veis (2009) Echinoderm phosphorylated matrix proteins UTM P16 and UTMP19 have different functions in sea urchin tooth mineralization. J Biol Chem 284: 26149–26160.
3.
Beniash, E., L. Addadi, S. Weiner (1999) Cellular control over spicule formation in sea urchin embryos: a structural approach. J StructBiol 125: 50–62.
4.
Cheers, M.S., C.A. Ettensohn: (2005) P16 is an essential regulator of skeletogenesis in the sea urchin embryo. Dev Biol 283: 384–396.
5.
Illies, M.R., M.T. Peeler, A.M. Dechtiaruk, C.A. Ettensohn (2002) Identification and developmental expression of new biomineralization proteins in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Dev Genes Evol 212: 419–431.
6.
Killian, C.E., R.A. Metzler, Y.U. Gong, I.C. Olson, J. Aizenberg, Y. Politi, F. Wilt, A. Scholl, A. Young, A. Doran, M. Kunz, N. Tamura, S.N. Coppersmith, P.U. Gilbert (2009) Mechanism of calcite co-orientation in the sea urchin tooth. J Am Chem Soc 131: 18404–18409.
7.
Kniprath, E. (1974) Ultrastructure and growth of the sea urchin tooth. Calcif Tissue Int 14: 211–228.
8.
Ma, Y., B. Aichmayer, O. Paris, Y. Politi, P. Fratzl, A. Meibom, R.A. Metzler, L. Addadi, P.U. Gilbert, S. Weiner (2009) The grinding tip of the sea urchin tooth exhibits exquisite control over calcite crystal orientation and Mg distribution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 6048–6053.
9.
Märkel, K. (1969) Morphologie der Seeigelzähne 2. Die gekielten Zähne der Echinacea (Echinodermata, Echinoidea). Zoomorphology 66: 1–50.
10.
Märkel, K., U. Röser, U. Mackenstedt, M. Klostermann (1986) Ultrastructural investigation of matrix-mediated biomineralization in echinoids (Echinodermata, Echinoida). Zoomorphology 106: 232–243.
11.
Robach, J.R, S.R. Stock, A. Veis (2005) Transmission electron microscopy characterization of macromolecular domain cavities and microstructure of single-crystal calcite tooth plates of the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus. J Struct Biol 151: 18–29.
12.
Robach, J.S., S.R. Stock, A. Veis (2006) Mapping of magnesium and of different protein fragments in sea urchin teeth via secondary ion mass spectroscopy. J Struct Biol 155: 87–95.
13.
Stock, S.R., J. Barss, T. Dahl, A. Veis, J.D. Almer (2002) X-ray absorption microtomography (microCT) and small beam diffraction mapping of sea urchin teeth. J Struct Biol 139: 1–12.
14.
Veis, D.J., T.M. Albinger, J. Clohisy, M. Rahima, B. Sabsay, A. Veis (1986) Matrix proteins of the teeth of the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus. J Exp Zool 240: 35–46.
15.
Veis, A., K. Alvares, S.N. Dixit, J.S. Robach, Stock, S.R. (2009) Characterization of two distinctly different mineral-related proteins from the teeth of the Camarodont sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus: specificity of function with relation to mineralization. Front Mater Sci China 3: 163–168.
16.
Veis, A., J. Barss, T. Dahl, M. Rahima, S.R. Stock (2002) Mineral-related proteins of the sea urchin teeth: Lytechinus variegatus. Microsc Res Tech 59: 342–351.
17.
Veis, A., T. Dahl, J. Barss (2004) The progress of mineral deposition within the developing tooth of the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus and its relation to specialized matrix proteins; in Heinzeller T., J.H. Niebelsick (eds): Echinoderms. London, Taylor and Francis Group, pp 365–370.
18.
Veis, A., S.N. Dixit, J.T. Barss, J.S. Robach, K. Alvares, J.P. Malone, E. Lux., S.R. Stock.(2007) Mineral-matrix relationships in the developing tooth of the sea urchin, Lytechinus variegatus; in Arias J.L., M.S. Fernández (eds): Biomineralization: from Paleontology to Materials Science. Santiago, Editorial Universitaria, pp 329–342.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.