The mechanical properties of bone are known to depend on its structure at all length scales. In large animals, such as sheep, cortical bone grows very quickly and it is known that this occurs in 2 stages whereby a poorly ordered (mostly woven) bone structure is initially deposited and later augmented and partially replaced by parallel fibered and lamellar bone with much improved mechanical properties, often called primary osteons. Most interestingly, a similar sequence of events has also recently been observed during callus formation in a sheep osteotomy model. This has prompted the idea that fast intramembranous bone formation requires an intermediate step where bone with a lower degree of collagen orientation is deposited first as a substrate for osteoblasts to coordinate the synthesis of lamellar tissue. Since some osteoblasts become embedded in the mineralizing collagen matrix which they synthesize, the resulting osteocyte network is a direct image of the location of osteoblasts during bone formation. Using 3-dimensional imaging of osteocyte networks as well as tissue characterization by polarized light microscopy and backscattered electron imaging, we revisit the structure of growing plexiform (fibrolamellar) bone and callus in sheep. We show that bone deposited initially is based on osteocytes without spatial correlation and encased in poorly ordered matrix. Bone deposited on top of this has lamellar collagen orientation as well as a layered arrangement of osteocytes, both parallel to the surfaces of the initial tissue. This supports the hypothesis that the initial bone constitutes an endogenous scaffold for the subsequent deposition of parallel fibered and lamellar bone.

Keywords:
Osteocyte network, Collagen matrix arrangement, Bone formation, healing, lamellar, woven
1.
Burger, E.H., J. Klein-Nulend (1999) Mechanotransduction in bone – role of the lacuno-canalicular network. FASEB J 13: S101–S112.
2.
Currey, J.D. (2002) Bones: Structure and Mechanics. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
3.
Franz-Odendaal, T.A., B.K. Hall, P.E. Witten (2006) Buried alive: how osteoblasts become osteocytes. Dev Dyn 235: 176–190.
4.
Fratzl, P., H.S. Gupta, E.P. Paschalis, P. Roschger (2004) Structure and mechanical quality of the collagen-mineral nano-composite in bone. J Mater Chem 14: 2115–2123.
5.
Jones, S.J., A. Boyde, J.B. Pawley (1975) Osteoblasts and collagen orientation. Cell Tissue Res 159: 73–80.
6.
Kerschnitzki, M., W. Wagermaier, P. Roschger, J. Seto, R. Shahar, G.N. Duda, S. Mundlos, P. Fratzl (2011) The organization of the osteocyte network mirrors the extracellular matrix orientation in bone. J Struct Biol 173: 303–311.
7.
Lanyon, L.E. (1993) Osteocytes, strain detection, bone modeling and remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int 53: S102–S107.
8.
Liu, Y.F., I. Manjubala, H. Schell, D.R. Epari, P. Roschger, G.N. Duda, P. Fratzl (2010) Size and habit of mineral particles in bone and mineralized callus during bone healing in sheep. J Bone Miner Res 25: 2029–2038.
9.
Mori, R., A. Hirayama, T. Kodaka, M. Nakamura (2007) Histological and physicochemical studies of hypercalcified primear lines in the laminar bone of young calves. Anat Sci Int 82: 108–115.
10.
Schell, H., D.R. Epari, J.P. Kassi, H. Bragulla, H.J. Bail, G.N. Duda (2005) The course of bone healing is influenced by the initial shear fixation stability. J Orthop Res 23: 1022–1028.
11.
Shapiro, F. (2008) Bone development and its relation to fracture repair: the role of mesenchymal osteoblasts and surface osteoblasts. Eur Cell Mater 15: 53–76.
12.
Stover, S.M., R.R. Pool, R.B. Martin, J.P. Morgan (1992) Histological features of the dorsal cortex of the 3rd metacarpal bone mid-diaphysis during postnatal growth in thoroughbred horses. J Anat 181: 455–469.
13.
Weiner, S., H.D. Wagner (1998) The material bone: structure mechanical function relations. Annu Rev Mater Sci 28: 271–298.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.