The cumulative effect of undernutrition on successive generations was tested. The cranial growth of three generations of undernourished rats (F1, F2, F3) was compared to that of the parental generation (P), in order to (1) measure the extent to which the growth of each facial and neurocranial functional component was retarded when animals were undernourished and (2) determine whether any cumulative effect between generations can be found. The P generation was fed ad libitum, and the undernourished generations were fed 50% (F1) and 75% (F2 and F3) of the parental diet. Nine radiographs were taken from the age of 20–100 days. The length, width and height of the neurocranial and facial components were measured on each radiograph. Neurocranial (VNI), facial (VFI), and neurofacial (NFI) indices were calculated. Data were processed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. An impairment in neurocranial and facial growth was found, the latter being more affected than the former in F1. At variance, the neurocranium was more affected than the face in F2 and F3, resulting in variations of the shape of the skull. A cumulative effect of moderate transgenerational undernutrition was evident and points to the need for further analysis on this topic.

Keywords:
Transgenerational undernutrition, Skull growth, Rat
1.
Bresler, D.E., et al. (1975) Learning deficits in rats with malnourished grandmothers. Dev Psychobiol 8: 315–323.
2.
Cheverud, J.M. (1982) Phenotypic, genetic, and environmental morphological integration in the cranium. Evolution 36: 449–516.
3.
Cowley, J.J., R.D. Griesel (1966) The effect on growth and behavior of rehabilitation of first and second generation low protein rats. Anim Behav 14:506–517.
4.
Dressino, V., H.M. Pucciarelli (1997) Cranial growth in Saimiri sciureus (Cebidae) and its alteration by nutritional factors: A longitudinal study. Am J Phys Anthropol 102: 545–554.
5.
Emanuel, I. (1986) Maternal health during childhood and later reproductive performance. Ann NY Acad Sci 477: 27–39.
6.
Emanuel, I. (1997) Invited commentary: An assessment of maternal intergenerational factors in pregnancy outcome. Am J Epidemiol 146: 820–825.
7.
Emanuel, I., et al. (1992) Intergenerational studies of human birth weight from the 1958 birth cohort. 1. Evidence for a multigenerational effect. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 99: 67–74.
8.
Fields, H.W. (1991) Craniofacial growth from infancy to adulthood. Pediatr Clin North Am 38: 1053–1088.
9.
Galler, J.R., K.J. Propert (1981) Maternal behavior following rehabilitation of rats with intergenerational malnutrition. 1. Persistent changes in lactation-related behaviors. J Nutr 111: 1330–1336.
10.
Galler, J.R., C. Seelig (1981) Home-orienting behavior in rat pups: The effect of 2 and 3 generations of rehabilitation following intergenerational malnutrition. Dev Psychobiol 14: 541–548.
11.
Garn, S.M., D.C. Clarck (1975) Nutrition, growth, development, and maturation: Findings from the Ten-State Nutrition Survey of 1968–1970. Pediatrics 56: 300–319.
12.
Kenney, M.A., E.B. Barton (1975) Malnutrition and fetal development in two generations of rats. Nutr Rep Int 11: 243–250.
13.
Klebanoff, M.A., et al. (1997) Preterm and small-for-gestational-age birth across generations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176: 521–526.
14.
Miller, J.P., R.Z. German (1999) Protein malnutrition affects the growth trajectories of the craniofacial skeleton in rats. J Nutr 129: 2061–2069.
15.
Moore, W.J. (1966) Skull growth in the albino rat (Rattus norvegicus). J Zool Lond 149: 137–144.
16.
Moss, M.L. (1973) A functional cranial analysis of primate craniofacial growth. 4th International Congress of Primatology. Basel, Karger, vol 3, pp 191–208.
17.
Park, A.W., B.J. Nowosielski-Slepowron (1983) Postnatal skull growth of the rat relative to environmental variance. Acta Morph Neerl Scand 21: 141–163.
18.
Pessoa, D.C., et al. (2000) Dietary proteins on reproductive performance in three consecutive generations of rats. Arch Latinoam Nutr 50: 55–61.
19.
Pucciarelli, H.M. (1981) Growth of the functional components of the rat skull and its alteration by nutritional effects. Am J Phys Anthropol 56: 33–41.
20.
Pucciarelli, H.M., et al. (1990) Changes in skull components of the squirrel monkey evoked by growth and nutrition: An experimental study. Am J Phys Anthropol 81: 535–543.
21.
Pucciarelli, H.M., et al. (2001) Relative food intake of rats submitted to a moderate transgenerational undernutrition. Growth Dev Aging 65: 83–93.
22.
Rajanna, B., et al. (1984) Experimental study on rats to find the usefulness of nutritional supplementation to undernourished offspring of parents undernourished life-long. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 28: 83–96.
23.
Resnick, O., P.J. Morgane (1984) Generational effect of protein malnutrition in the rat. Brain Res 317: 219–227.
24.
Sanderson, M., I. Emanuel, V. Holt, (1995) The intergenerational relationship between birthweight, infant birthweight and infant mortality in black and white mothers. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 9: 391–405.
25.
Srivastava, U., et al. (1974) Maternal dietary deficiency and cellular development of progeny in the rat. J Nutr 104: 512–520.
26.
Stewart, R.J., et al. (1973) The long-term effects of marginal protein-energy deficiency. Proc Nutr Soc 32: 102A–103A.
27.
Widdowson, E.M., R.A. McCance (1963) The effect of finite periods of undernutrition at different ages on the composition and subsequent development on the rat. Proc R Soc B 158: 329–342.
28.
Zamenhof, S., E. van Marthens (1978) The effects of chronic undernutrition over generations on rat development. J Nutr 108: 1719–1723.
© 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
2003
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.