The purpose of this investigation was to measure in vivo fascicle length (Lfas) and pennation angle (PA) of the long head of the biceps femoris muscle (BFlh m.) at different hip and knee angles while the muscle was relaxed using ultrasonography (US). Data were collected from 18 healthy females (23.0 ± 1.8 years). To validate the measurements of the Lfas and PA, the US measurements on cadavers (n = 5), embalmed with the hip and knee in anatomical position, were compared to actual fiber lengths and PA from the dissected muscles. US images from volunteer subjects were recorded when the hip joint was positioned at 0°, 45° and 90° of hip flexion, and at each hip position, the knee joint was placed at 0°, 45° and 90° from full extension. The images were digitized to measure Lfas and PA. Results showed no significant differences between US and direct measurements of the Lfas and PA on the cadaver BFlh m. (p > 0.05). Lfas and PA changed significantly between the different hip and knee positions in volunteer subjects (p < 0.05). Changes in the Lfas and PA are more sensitive to changes in hip position with the knee position constant than to changes in knee position with the hip position constant. This difference may be related to the larger muscle moment arm at the hip resulting in greater excursion of the muscle with changing hip position. Based on the changes in Lfas with changing joint positions, BFlh sarcomere length was estimated to occupy a portion of the ascending limb, the plateau and descending limb of the length-tension relationship over the range of motion studied. US scanning is valid and reliable for measuring Lfas and PA of the BFlh m. An understanding of the dynamic nature of muscle architecture will assist in determining effective and efficient clinical evaluation and rehabilitation techniques.

1.
Alexander, R., A. Vernon (1975) The dimensions of knee and ankle muscles and the forces they exert. J Hum Mov Stud 1: 115–123.
2.
Chleboun, G.S., T.J. Patel, R.L. Lieber (1997) Skeletal muscle architecture and fiber-type distribution with the multiple bellies of the mouse extensor digitorum longus muscle. Acta Anat 159: 147–155.
3.
Cutts, A. (1988) The range of sarcomere lengths in the muscles of the human lower limb. J Anat 160: 79–88.
4.
Edgerton, V., J. Smith, D. Simpson (1975) Muscle fiber type populations of human leg muscles. Histochem J 7: 259–266.
5.
Ettema, G.J., P.A. Huijing (1989) Properties of the tendinous structures and series elastic component of EDL muscle-tendon complex of the rat. J Biochem 22: 1209–1215.
6.
Fukunaga, T., Y. Ichinose, M. Ito, Y. Kawakami, S. Fukashiro (1997) Determination of fascicle length and pennation in a contracting human muscle in vivo. J Appl Physiol 82: 354–358.
7.
Gans, C., F. De Vree (1987) Functional bases of fiber length and angulation in muscle. J Morphol 192: 63–85.
8.
Gordon, A.M., A.F. Huxley, F.J. Julian (1966) The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol 184: 170–192.
9.
Hoy, M., F. Zajac, M. Gordon (1990) A musculoskeletal model of the human lower extremity: The effect of muscle, tendon, and moment arm on the moment-angle relationship of the musculotendon actuators at the hip, knee, and ankle. J Biomech 23: 157–169.
10.
Ito, M., Y. Kawakami, Y. Ichinose, S. Fukashiro, T. Fukunaga (1998) Nonisometric behavior of fascicles during isometric contractions of a human muscle. J Appl Physiol 85: 1230–1235.
11.
Kawakami, Y., Y. Ichinose, T. Fukunaga (1998) Architectural and functional features of human triceps surae muscles during contraction. J Appl Physiol 85: 398–404.
12.
Kendall, F., E. McCreary, P. Provance (1993) Muscles Testing and Function. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins.
13.
Knapik, J.J., J.E. Wright, R.H. Mawdsley, J. Braun (1983) Isometric, isotonic, and isokinetic torque variations in four muscle groups through a range of joint motion. Phys Ther 63: 938–947.
14.
Kumagai, K., T. Abe, W.F. Brechue, T. Ryushi, S. Takano, M. Mizuno (2000) Sprint performance is related to muscle fascile length in male 100-m sprinters. J Appl Physiol 88: 811–816.
15.
Lieber, R., S. Bodine-Fowler (1993) Skeletal muscle mechanics: Implications for rehabilitation. Phys Ther 73: 844–856.
16.
Lieber, R., B. Ljung, J. Friden (1997) Intraoperative sarcomere measurements reveal differential design of human wrist extensor muscles. J Exp Biol 200: 19–25.
17.
Lieber, R., G. Loren, J. Friden (1994) In vivo measurement of human wrist extensor muscle sarcomere length changes. J Neurophysiol 71: 874–881.
18.
Lindh, M. (1979) Increase of muscle strength from isometric quadriceps exercises at different knee angles. Scand J Rehabil Med 11: 33–36.
19.
Maganaris, C., V. Baltaopoulos, A. Sargeant (1998) In vivo measurements of the triceps surae complex architecture in man: Implications for muscle function. J Physiol 512: 603–614.
20.
Maganaris, C.N., J.P. Paul (2000) Load-elongation characteristics of in vivo human tendon and aponeurosis. J Exp Biol 203: 751–756.
21.
Narici, M., T. Binzoni, E. Hiltbrand, J. Fasel, F. Terrier, P. Cerretelli (1996) In vivo human gastrocnemius architecture with changing joint angle at rest and during graded isometric contraction. J Physiol 486: 287–297.
22.
Rome, L., A. Sosnicki (1991) Myofilament overlap in swimming carp. II. Sarcomere length changes during swimming. Am J Physiol 260: C289–C296.
23.
Smidt, G. (1973) Biomechanical analysis of knee flexion and extension. J Biomech 6: 79–92.
24.
Staron, R., D. Karapondo, W. Kraemer, A. Fry, S. Gordon, J. Falkel, F. Hagerman, R. Hikida (1994) Skeletal muscle adaptations during early phase of heavy-resistance training in men and women. J Appl Physiol 76: 1247–1255.
25.
Visser, J., J. Hoogkamer, M. Bobbert, P. Huijing (1990) Length and moment arm of human leg muscles as a function of knee and hip-joint angles. Eur J Appl Physiol 61: 453–460.
26.
Weijs, W., T. van der Wielen-Drent (1982) Sarcomere length and EMG activity in some jaw muscles of the rabbit. Acta Anat 113: 178–188.
27.
Wickiewicz, T., R. Roy, P. Powell, V. Edgerton (1983) Muscle architecture of the human lower limb. Clin Orthop 179: 275–283.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.