The lumbosacral ligament (LSL), situated between the L5-vertebra and the sacrum, was studied in autopsy material. Twenty-eight cadaveric specimens from 12 black and 16 white persons aged 17–30 years were studied during routine forensic autopsies. The ligaments were measured and determined in situ. Thereafter, the ligaments were removed for histologic preparation. The ligament in the black subjects was thicker compared with the white (7.5 ± 1.4 vs. 5.7 ± 1.2 mm), and wider (11.7 ± 1.6 mm in the black vs. 9.2 ± 0.5 mm in the white), yielding a greater cross-sectional area in the black group (70.7 ± 22.8 vs. 34.5 ± 11.4 mm2, p < 0.001). However, no histological differences were noted. The previously described fibro-osseus tunnel could not be detected in any of the subjects. In all instances, the ligament was situated medial to the L5 nerve. Compression of the L5 nerve under the previously presented fibro-osseus tunnel could not be confirmed.

1.
Basadonna, P.T., D. Gasparini, V. Rucco (1996) Iliolumbar ligament insertions: In vivo anatomic study. Spine 21: 2313–2316.
2.
Bogduk, N. (1997) Clinical Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine and Sacrum, ed 3. London, Churchill-Livingstone.
3.
Briggs, C.A., S. Chandraraj (1995) Variations in the lumbosacral ligament and associated changes in the lumbosacral region resulting in compression of the fifth dorsal root ganglion and spinal nerve (see comments). Clin Anat 8: 339–346.
4.
Hammersen F. (1980) Sobotta/Hammersen Histology. A Color Atlas of Cytology, Histology and Microscopic Anatomy, ed 2. Baltimore, Urban & Schwarzenberg.
5.
Hanson, P., S.P. Magnusson (1998) The difference in anatomy of the lumbar anterior longitudinal ligament in young African-Americans and Scandinavians. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79: 1545–1548.
6.
Hanson, P., S.P. Magnusson, H. Sorensen, E.B. Simonsen (1998) Differences in the iliolumbar ligament and the transverse process of the L5 vertebra in young white and black people. Acta Anat (Basel) 163: 218–223.
7.
Hanson, P., B. Sonesson (1994) The anatomy of the iliolumbar ligament. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75: 1245–1246.
8.
Luk, K.D., H.C. Ho, J.C. Leong (1986) The iliolumbar ligament. A study of its anatomy, development and clinical significance. J Bone Joint Surg 68: 197–200.
9.
Nathan, H., M. Weizenbluth, N. Halperin (1982) The lumbosacral ligament (LSL), with special emphasis on the ‘lumbosacral tunnel’ and the entrapment of the 5th lumbar nerve. Int Orthop 6: 197–202.
10.
Neumann, P., T.S. Keller, L. Ekstrom, L. Perry, T.H. Hansson, D.M. Spengler (1992) Mechanical properties of the human lumbar anterior longitudinal ligament. J Biomech 25: 1185–1194.
11.
Olsewski, J.M., E.H. Simmons, F.C. Kallen, F.C. Mendel (1991) Evidence from cadavers suggestive of entrapment of fifth lumbar spinal nerves by lumbosacral ligaments. Spine 16: 336–347.
12.
Pecina, M.M., J. Krmpotic-Nemanic, A.D. Markiewitz (1997) Tunnel Syndromes. Peripheral Nerve Compression Syndromes, ed 2. Boca Raton, CRC Press.
13.
Rucco, V., P.T. Basadonna, D. Gasparini (1996) Anatomy of the iliolumbar ligament: A review of its anatomy and a magnetic resonance study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 75: 451–455.
14.
Shellshear, J.L. N.G.W. (1949) Surveys of Anatomical Fields. Syndney, Grahame.
15.
Uhthoff, H.K. (1993) Prenatal development of the iliolumbar ligament. J Bone Joint Surg 75: 93–95.
16.
Vernon-Roberts, B. (1992) Age-related and degenerative pathology of intervertebral discs and apophyseal joints; in Jayson, M.I.V. (ed): The Lumbar Spine and Back Pain. London, Churchill-Livingstone, vol 4. pp 17–41.
17.
Williams, P.L. (ed) (1995) Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Medicine and Surgery; ed 36. Edinburgh, Churchill-Livingstone.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.