Most investigators consider the caroticotympanic artery to be a normal branch of the petrous portion of the internal carotid artery, although some authors disagree. The present study was conducted on forty human temporal bones removed from adult cadavers of both sexes. Twenty pieces were injected and dissected under a surgical microscope, 10 pieces were injected and submitted to corrosion, and 10 were injected and diaphanized in order to observe the frequency of the caroticotympanic artery in the petrous portion of the internal carotid artery. The caroticotympanic artery was not observed in any of the pieces submitted to microdissection and was observed in only 1 of the pieces (10%) submitted to corrosion and also in 1 of the diaphanized pieces (10%). In both cases, only one artery was present. Based on the present results showing that the rate of occurrence of the caroticotympanic artery was very low by the three techniques utilized (microdissection 0%; corrosion 10%; diaphanization 10%), it is possible to conclude that, anatomically, the artery should be considered as a variation and not as a normal branch of the petrous portion of the internal carotid artery, in agreement with most literature reports.

Keywords:
Caroticotympanic artery, Internal carotid artery, Temporal bone structure, Arteries, head
1.
Altmann F (1947) Anomalies of the internal carotid artery and its branches; their embryological and comparative anatomical significance. Report of a new case of persistent strapedical artery in man. Laryngoscope 57: 313–339.
2.
Andreo, J.C., J.A.C. Navarro, J.L. Toledo Filho, N.L. Zorzetto (1997) Anatomical study of the intrapetrous segment of the internal carotid artery. Braz J Morphol Sci 14/1: 25–28.
3.
Glasscock, M.E., J.R.E. Dickins, C.G. Jackson, R.J. Wiet (1980) Vascular anomalies of the middle ear. Laryngoscope 90: 77–88.
4.
Hogg, I.R. (1972) Theorical anomalies of the stapedial artery. Ann Otol 81: 860–870.
5.
Lasujaunias, P., A. Berensteins (1983) Surgical Neuroangiography – Functional Anatomy of Craniofacial Arteries, ed 1. London, Springer.
6.
Lasjaunias, P., J. Moret (1978) Normal and non-pathological variations in the angiographic aspect of the arteries of the middle ear. Neuroradiology 15: 213–219.
7.
Lasjaunias, P., J. Moret, C. Manelfe, J. Théron, T. Hasso, J. Seeger (1977) Arterial anomalies at the base of the skull. Neuroradiology 13: 267–272.
8.
Lockhart, J., G.F. Hamilton, F.W. Fyfe (1983) Anatomia do corpo humano, ed 2. Rio de Janeiro, Guanabara Koogan.
9.
Meder, J.F., J. Blustajn, D. Trystram, S. Godon-Hardy, B. Devaux, M. Zuber, D. Fredy (1997) Radiologic anatomy of segmental agenesis of the internal carotid artery. Surgy Radiol Anat 19: 358–394.
10.
Morantz, R.A., F.R. Kirchner, P. Hishore (1976) Aneurysms of the petrous portion of the internal carotid artery. Surg Neurol 6: 313–318.
11.
Nager, G.T., M. Nager (1953) The arteries of the human middle ear, with particular regard to the blood supply of the auditory ossicle. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 62: 923–949.
12.
Orts Lhorca, F. (1962) Anatomia humana, ed 2. Barcelona, Editorial Científico Médica.
13.
Osborn, A.G. (1980) The vidian artery: Normal and pathologic anatomy. Radiology 136: 373–378.
14.
Papazian, M., M. Paparella, E. Haems (1993) Aneurysm of the temporal bone. Ear Nose Throat J 72: 474–484.
15.
Paullus, W.S., G. Pait, A.L. Rhoton Jr (1977) Microsurgical exposure of the petrous portion of the carotid artery. J Neurosurg 47: 713–726.
16.
Pfiffer, C.R., V. Freitas, N.L. Zorzetto (1980) Observaciones microscópicas de la pared de la artéria carótida interna en los segmentos cervical y petroso. Anat Histol Embryol 9: 44–51.
17.
Pfifer, C.R., N.L. Zorzetto (1982) Aspectos morfológicos de la artéria carótida interna en el conduto carotídeo. Anat Histol Embryol 11: 45–49.
18.
Poirier, P., A. Charpy, B. Cunéo (1909) Abrégé d’anatomie. Paris, Masson.
19.
Poncet, P., P. Miller (1979) Aberrant course of the intrapetrous internal carotid in the cardium analysis of the personal case. Review of the literature. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 96: 793–804.
20.
Quisling, R.G., A. Rhoton (1979) Intrapetrous carotid artery branches radioanatomic analysis. Neurology 131: 133–136.
21.
Quisling, R.G. (1980) Intrapetrous carotic artery branches: Pathological application. Radiology 134/1: 109–113.
22.
Rodrigues, H. (1973) Técnicas anatómicas. Juiz de Fora, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora.
23.
Romanes, J.G. (1964) Cunningham’s Textbook of Anatomy, ed 10. London, Oxford University Press.
24.
Rouviére, H. (1979) Anatomia humana descrptiva y topográfica, ed 6. Madrid, Casa Editorial Bailly Bailliere.
25.
Schaeffer, J.O. (1953) Morri’s Human Anatomy, ed 1. New York, McGraw-Hill Book.
26.
Sinnreich, A.I., S.C. Parisier, N.L. Cohen, M. Berreby (1984) Arterial malformations of the middle ear. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 92/2: 194–206.
27.
Shankar, L., A.L. Mehta, M. Hawke, J. Rutka (1992) High resolution computed tomography of an aberrant internal carotid artery. J Otolaryngol 21: 373–375.
28.
Steffen, T.N. (1968) Vascular anomalies of the middle ear. Laryngoscope 78/2: 171–197.
29.
Testut, L., A. Latarjet (1958) Tratado de anatomia humana. Barcelona, Salvat Editores.
30.
Warwick, R., P.L. Williams (1995) Gray’s Anatomy, ed 37. New York, Churchill Livingstone.
© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
2000
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.