Previous workers have reported a range of structural variations occurring along the length of small intestine. These studies have concentrated on the major intestinal components with little information available on the intersite variation of other members of a highly heterogeneous population. Using resin histology, the current study has collected data per circumference for all definable structural features within the murine intestinal wall, along with measurements for epithelial, muscle, nerve and connective tissue areas, and villous height and cryptal depth. Seven different sites along the length of the small intestine were examined. Following statistical comparisons a number of features exhibited no intersite variation; these were numbers of villi, submucosal vessels, myenteric nerve plexus profiles, inner muscle nuclei and apoptotic bodies as well as measurements for tissue areas and cryptal depth. Variations were seen between sites for crypts, enterocytes, villous and cryptal stromal cells, cryptal goblet cells, cryptal non-secretory epithelial cells, Paneth cells, endocrine cells, intra-epithelial lymphocytes, submucosal nerve plexus profiles, outer muscle nuclei and mitotic figures. A reduced villous height was observed caudally. Certain correlations between villous height/crypt number and constituent parameters have been noted. The results provide a complete description of how each definable structural feature within the gut wall varies at regular intervals along the length of the small intestine in C57 BL mice. A number of previously unreported variations have been described. The work provides a comprehensive data bank for future intestinal investigations.

Keywords:
Gut, Intestinal components
1.
Aparicio, S.R., P. Marsden (1969) A rapid methylene blue-basic fuchsin stain for semi-thin sections of peripheral nerve and other tissues. J Microsc 89: 139–141.
2.
Brandtzaeg, P., T.S. Halstensen, M. Hvatum, H. Scott (1992) The coeliac lesion: Immunological features. Proc 6th Int Symp Coeliac Dis, pp 117–131.
3.
Carr, K.E., J.S. McCullough, P.C. Brennan, T.L. Hayes, E.J. Ainsworth, A.C. Nelson (1994a) Heavy ion induced changes in small intestine parameters. Adv Space Res 14: 521–530.
4.
Carr, K.E., J.S. McCullough, R.St.C. Gilmore, B. Abbas, S.P. Hume, A.C. Nelson, T.L. Hayes, E.J. Ainsworth (1994b) Effects of neon ions, neutrons and X-rays on small intestine; in Swenberg, C.E., G. Hornbeck, E.G. Stassinopoulos (eds): Biological Effects and Physics of Solar and Galactic Cosmic Radiation. New York, Plenum Press, pp 203–216.
5.
Carr, K.E., J.S. McCullough, A.C. Nelson, S.P. Hume, S. Nunn, H.H.M. Kamel (1992a) Relationship between villous shape and mural structure in neutron irradiated small intestine. Scanning Microsc 6: 561–572.
6.
Carr, K.E., J.S. McCullough, S. Nunn, S.P. Hume, A.C. Nelson (1991) Neutron and X-ray effects of small intestine summarized by using a mathematical model or paradigm. Proc R Soc Lond 243: 187–194.
7.
Carr, K.E., A.C. Nelson, S.P. Hume, J.S. McCullough (1992b) Characterization through a data display of the different cellular responses in X-irradiated small intestine. J Radiat Res 33: 163–177.
8.
Cheng, H. (1974a) Origin, differentiation and renewal of the four main epithelial cell types in the mouse small intestine. II Mucous cells. Am J Anat 141: 481–502.
9.
Cheng, H. (1974b) Origin, differentiation and renewal of the four main epithelial cell types in the mouse small intestine. IV. Paneth cells. Am J Anat 141: 461–480.
10.
Cheng, H., C.P. Leblond (1974a) Origin, differentiation and renewal of the four main epithelial cell types in the mouse small intestine. I. Columnar cell. Am J Anat 141: 461–480.
11.
Cheng, H., C.P. Leblond (1974b) Origin, differentiation and renewal of the four main epithelial cell types in the mouse small intestine. III. Entero-endocrine cells. Am J Anat 141: 503–520.
12.
Clarke, R. (1970) Mucosal architecture and epithelial cell production rate in the small intestine of the albino rat. J Anat 107: 519–529.
13.
Clarke, R. (1972) The effect of growth and of fasting on the number of villi and crypts in the small intestine of the albino rat. J Anat 112: 27–33.
14.
D’Inca, R., G.C. Sturniolo, D. Martines, V. Di Leo, A. Cecchetto, C. Venturi, R. Naccarato (1995) Functional and morphological changes in small bowel of Crohn’s disease patients. Influence of site of disease. Dig Dis Sci 40: 1388–1393.
15.
Ettarh, R.R., K.E. Carr (1996) Morphometric analysis of small intestine epithelium in the indomethacin treated mouse. J Anat 189: 51–56.
16.
Ferguson, A. (1994) Immunological functions of the gut in the relation to nutritional state and mode of delivery of nutrients. Gut 1: S10–S12.
17.
Fisher, R.B., D.S. Parsons (1950) The gradient of mucosal surface area in the small intestine of the rat. J Anat 84: 272–282.
18.
Goodlad, R.A., B. Ratcliffe, J.P. Fordham, C.Y. Lee, N.A. Wright (1990) Effects of the intestinal microflora and dietary fibre on colonic epithelial cell production. Proc Nutr Soc 49: 37.
19.
Jenkins, A.P., R.P. Thompson (1993) Does the fatty acid profile of dietary fat influence its trophic effect on the small intestinal mucosa? Gut 34: 358–364.
20.
Leblond, C.P. (1980) The life history of cells in renewing systems. Am J Anat 160: 114–158.
21.
Madara, J.L., J.S. Trier (1987) Functional morphology of the mucosa of small intestine; in Johnson, L.R. (ed): Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract. New York, Raven Press, pp 1209–1249.
22.
Mayhew, T.M., F.L. Carson (1989) Mechanisms of adaptation in rat small intestine: Regional differences in quantitative morphology during normal growth and experimental hypertrophy. J Anat 164: 189–200.
23.
Neutra, M.R., H.A. Padykula (1983) The gastrointestinal tract; in Weiss, L. (ed): Histology: Cell and Tissue Biology. London, Macmillan Press, pp 183–193.
24.
Ouellette, A.J. (1997) Paneth cells and innate immunity in the crypt microenvironment. Gastroenterology 113: 1779–1784.
25.
Ouellette, A.J., M.E. Selsted (1996) Paneth cell defensins: Endogenous peptide components of intestinal host defense. FASEB J 10: 1280–1289.
26.
Peeters, T., G. Van Trappen (1975) The Paneth cell: A source of intestinal lysozyme. Gut 16: 553–564.
27.
Potten, C.S., J.H. Hendry (1985) The micro-colony assay in mouse small intestine; in Potten, C.S., J.H. Hendry (eds): Manual of Mammalian Cell Techniques. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, pp 50–60.
28.
Rodning, C.B., I.D. Wilson, S.L. Erlandsen (1976) Immunoglobulins within human small intestinal Paneth cells. Lancet i: 984–987.
29.
Sokal, R.R., F.J. Rohlf (1981) Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, ed 2. San Francisco, Freeman.
30.
Specian, R.D., M.G. Oliver (1991) Functional biology of intestinal goblet cells. Am J Physiol 260: C183–C193.
31.
Withers, H.R., M.M. Elkind (1970) Microcolony survival assay for cells of mouse small intestinal mucosa exposed to radiation. Int J Radiat Biol 17: 261–267.
32.
Wright, N.A., J. Carter, M. Irwin (1989) The measurement of villus cell population size in the mouse small intestine in normal and abnormal states: A comparison of absolute measurements with morphometric estimators in sectioned immersion-fixed material. Cell Tissue Kinet 22: 425–450.
1999
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.