Osteoid osteoma (OO) usually occurs in the extremities of young adults. The tumor can arise in any part of the skeletal tissue; however, it is rarely found in the rib, with limited reports to date. In this report, we present a rare case of OO arising in the rib, which was successfully treated under computed tomography guidance with minimal invasiveness. At the final follow-up after 4 years, no local recurrence was observed.

Osteoid osteoma (OO) is a benign tumor characterized by a small calcified lesion, usually less than 2 cm in diameter, with nocturnal pain alleviated by the administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). OO usually affects the long bones and mostly occurs in the first 2 decades of life. OO arising in the rib is extremely rare, and only 12 cases have been reported in detail to date. Treatment for this tumor is resection of the nidus; however, difficulty in reaching the nidus through normal tissues increases the invasiveness of the surgical procedure. In the reported cases of rib OOs with surgical documentation, the affected ribs were resected in all cases. Here, we present the first case of OO arising in the rib treated with a computed tomography (CT)-guided procedure without en bloc resection of the affected rib.

A 20-year-old male complained of nocturnal pain in his left anterior chest which had persisted for 2 years. Conservative treatment was performed for a period of 22 months with administration of NSAIDs at a nearby hospital. His symptoms were refractory to medication. Therefore, he was referred to our hospital for further treatment. At the initial visit to our hospital, there was no local tenderness, swelling, or redness. A plain radiograph showed bulging and mild bone sclerosis of the left 8th rib (fig. 1). CT examinations revealed a well-demarcated 5-mm nidus with peripheral bone sclerosis in this area (fig. 2). The bone scintigraphy showed focal uptake of radioisotope only on the left 8th rib. Clinical and radiological findings were compatible with an OO of the left 8th rib. Because the patient refused to undergo en bloc rib resection, the operative plan was to perform resection of the nidus under CT guidance. The operative procedure was performed in the CT room under total anesthesia. After identifying the nidus with a marker, a guide pin was inserted by a power drill just adjacent to the edge of the nidus. A 5.0-mm cannulated drill was inserted over the guide pin to remove the nidus. After removing the lesion, the bone specimen which resided in the cannulated drill was sent for histological study. Subsequently, heat ablation by an electrosurgical knife using a standard electrosurgical generator was performed to completely destroy any residual tumors. Each step was confirmed by CT imaging (fig. 3). Histopathological studies showed the characteristic appearance of an OO with differentiated osteoblasts lining the osteoid and interconnected trabeculae of woven bone (fig. 4). Complete pain relief associated with the nidus resection was achieved from the first postoperative day. The patient was free of pain at the final follow-up after 4 years, and no local recurrence was observed.

Fig. 1

Radiograph of the rib at the initial presentation. Bulging and mild sclerosis can be seen in the left 8th rib (arrow).

Fig. 1

Radiograph of the rib at the initial presentation. Bulging and mild sclerosis can be seen in the left 8th rib (arrow).

Close modal
Fig. 2

Preoperative CT examination. Axial view (a) and sagittal view (b). An osteolytic lesion surrounded by bone sclerosis (arrow) can be observed in the left 8th rib without any periosteal reaction.

Fig. 2

Preoperative CT examination. Axial view (a) and sagittal view (b). An osteolytic lesion surrounded by bone sclerosis (arrow) can be observed in the left 8th rib without any periosteal reaction.

Close modal
Fig. 3

Intraoperative findings. a A guidewire has been inserted into the nidus under CT guidance. b Tumor resection by a 5.0-mm cannulated drill over the guidewire. c A postoperative CT shows the successful resection of the nidus.

Fig. 3

Intraoperative findings. a A guidewire has been inserted into the nidus under CT guidance. b Tumor resection by a 5.0-mm cannulated drill over the guidewire. c A postoperative CT shows the successful resection of the nidus.

Close modal
Fig. 4

Histopathological findings demonstrate random reticular osteoid formation within a fibrovascular stroma consistent with OO.

Fig. 4

Histopathological findings demonstrate random reticular osteoid formation within a fibrovascular stroma consistent with OO.

Close modal

OO is a benign osteogenic tumor first reported by Jaffe [1] in 1935. OOs may affect any bone, but more than half of the tumors occur in the long bones of the lower extremities. The frequency of OOs affecting the ribs is extremely low (1∼1.4%), with only 12 reported cases with surgical intervention to date [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].

Both conservative and operative techniques have been reported for the treatment of OO. Conservative treatment consists of NSAID administration for a prolonged period of time, which reportedly leads to alleviation of pain in select cases. The common principle for operative treatment of OO is thorough resection of the nidus, and incomplete resection could lead to local recurrence. A complete resection of the nidus by open surgery may lead to further damage of bone and soft tissues around the lesion, when the affected bone is not subcutaneous or when visual localization of the nidus is technically difficult. Although the ribs are easily accessed, the reported lengths of en bloc resection of the nidus ranged from 5 to 9.5 cm, which is significantly wider than the size of the nidus [4,5,6,7]. There are reports of varying degrees of functional impairments due to rib resection.

In 1990, Voto et al. [14] introduced the successful treatment of OOs by percutaneous CT-guided resection. Over the years, several percutaneous treatment methods using CT guidance have been introduced: drilling resection, thermocoagulation with radiofrequency, ethanol injection, and a combination of these methods. These CT-guided percutaneous procedures are less invasive than conventional resection. However, recurrence rates have been reported to be as high as 10∼20%, and in cases where the nidus is >10 mm, these procedures have been reported to be more likely to fail [15]. Despite these recurrence rates, a secondary operation either by CT guidance or en bloc resection leads to good results due to the remaining trace left by the primary treatment, enabling minimally invasive en bloc resection. One drawback of CT-guided resection is that a histological diagnosis may be difficult in some cases, because the resected specimens are small in quantity. By using a cannulated drill and careful curettage, we were able to make a histological diagnosis in over 90% of the cases (data not shown). CT-guided percutaneous treatment should be considered as a first-line therapy for OO in the majority of cases, except for lesions difficult to access due to the proximity of vital organs, lesions presenting with atypical findings that are difficult to diagnose as OO, and failed primary CT-guided treatments.

We were able to avoid rib resection without any recurrence of symptoms by the use of a CT-guided resection and heat ablation. In addition, we were able to obtain enough tissue for histological examination by using a 5.0-mm cannulated drill. CT-guided procedures should be considered as a treatment of choice for OO of the rib in order to minimize the loss of respiratory function.

The authors have no ethical conflicts to disclose. Informed consent was obtained from the patient for this case report and any accompanying images.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

1.
Jaffe HL: ‘Osteoid-osteoma': a benign osteoblastic tumor composed of osteoid and atypical bone. Arch Surg 1935;31:709-728.
2.
Mauer I: Osteoid osteoma of the 12th rib; resection under local anesthesia; a case report. Mil Med 1958;122:194.
3.
Kehl DK, Alonso JE, Lovell WW: Scoliosis secondary to an osteoid-osteoma of the rib. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;65:701-703.
4.
McGuire MH, Mankin HJ: Osteoid osteoma: an unusual presentation as a rib lesion. A case report. Orthopedics 1984;7:305-307.
5.
Mehdian H, Summers B, Eisenstein S: Painful scoliosis secondary to an osteoid osteoma of the rib. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;230:273-276.
6.
Veluvolu P, Winkler T, Sajjad SM, Leer RA, Fontanini SM: Osteoid osteoma involving body of right rib. Preoperative localization and postoperative confirmation. Clin Nucl Med 1992;17:895-896.
7.
Deng Z, Ding Y, Hao L, et al: Osteoid osteoma of the rib: a report of two cases. Oncol Lett 2015;9:1857-1860.
8.
Lynch MC, Dorgan JC: Osteoid osteoma of a rib as a cause of scoliosis. A case report. Spine 1986;11:480-482.
9.
Nelson MC, Brower AC, Ragsdale BD: Case report 448. Osteoid osteoma of left 6th rib with inflammatory reaction in the adjacent pleura and hyperostosis of the adjacent ribs. Skeletal Radiol 1987;16:601-603.
10.
Kozlowski D, Campbell J, Morris L, Sprague P, Taccone A, Beluffi G, Marcinski A, Porta F, Stevens M: Primary rib tumors in children (report of 27 cases with short literature review). Australas Radiol 1989;33:210-222.
11.
Cossetto D, Cummine J: Rapidly growing twelfth rib osteoid osteoma. Aust NZ J Surg 1991;61:862-864.
12.
Hoeffel JC, Lascombes P, Delgoffe C, Aymard B, Galloy MA: Osteoid osteoma of the rib: a case report. J Pediatr Surg 1993;28:738-740.
13.
McDermott MB, Kyriakos M, McEnery K: Painless osteoid osteoma of the rib in an adult. A case report and a review of the literature. Cancer 1996;77:1442-1449.
14.
Voto SJ, Cook AJ, Weiner DS, Ewing JW, Arrington LE: Treatment of osteoid osteoma by computed tomography guided excision in the pediatric patient. J Pediatr Orthop 1990;10:510-513.
15.
Lindner NJ, Ozaki T, Roedl R, Gosheger G, Winkelmann W, Wörtler K: Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in osteoid osteoma. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001;83:391-396.
Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.