Introduction: Ovarian yolk sac tumors after the menopause are very rare. Case Presentation: We report an atypical case of yolk sac tumor in an octogenarian woman, who presented to the hospital with anasarca, ascites, toxic syndrome, and an abdominal mass. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels were highly increased (246,720 ng/mL), and malignant cells with positive AFP immunohistochemical expression were detected in a diagnostic paracentesis. The definitive diagnosis was established by histopathological examination of the surgical specimen and immunohistochemical detection of positivity for AFP, glypican 3, cytokeratin AE1/AE3, and focal positivity for SALL4 and CK7. Adjuvant chemotherapy was refused by the patient. Postoperative AFP values decreased to normal limits. One year after surgery, she remains in good clinical condition without evidence of tumor recurrence. In a review of the literature, 11 cases of yolk sac tumors in postmenopausal women were collected. The mean age of the patients was 63.4 years (range 58–82 years). Frequent findings were FIGO stage II, cytoreductive surgery, immunohistochemical analyses of a large panel of markers, postoperative chemotherapy, and no tumor recurrence (except in 1 patient who died), although the length of follow-up was relatively short or unclearly stated. Conclusion: The present case report illustrates that yolk sac tumors in very old women may have a favorable clinical course without signs of recurrence even in the absence of radical surgical resection with curative intent and associated adjuvant chemotherapy.

Yolk sac tumors, also known as endodermal sinus tumors, are malignant primitive germ cell tumors commonly arising in the gonads and are rare and rapidly growing neoplasms. In pediatric ages, yolk sac tumors in the testes or ovary are found in a pure form and have a good prognosis in this age group, whereas yolk sac tumors in adults are often found in combination with other types of germ cell tumors [1‒3]. In females, ovarian germ cell tumors usually present in the adolescence and in young women in fertile age, with a prevalence of approximately 1–3% of all malignant ovarian neoplasms and poor prognosis [4]. Given that malignant germ cell tumors occur rarely compared to epithelial ovarian tumors, greater focus is required in their diagnosis and treatment. Suggestive diagnostic findings including an enhanced large solid cystic mass with intertumoral hemorrhage in radioimaging studies and increased serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels should be confirmed by microscopic examination of biopsy or surgical specimens [5, 6].

The present-day treatment for yolk sac tumors is surgery (fertility-sparing procedures) and adjuvant chemotherapy, achieving high complete remission rates and prolonged overall survival [7‒9]. Ovarian yolk sac tumors occur very rarely after menopause. We here report an atypical case of yolk sac tumor in an older woman. This case is unique because it occurred in an octogenarian patient and showed a favorable clinical course without signs of tumor recurrence after 1 year of follow-up.

An 80-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital because of anasarca, ascites, toxic syndrome, and an abdominal mass. Family history was unrevealing. Gynecological history showed menarche at 14 years of age, menopause at 44 years, 1 eutocic delivery, and 1 spontaneous abortion. A thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT) scanning revealed an abdominopelvic mass, 18.5 cm in diameter, probably originated from the right uterine appendages, abundant ascites with trabeculation of the anterior peritoneal fat, hepatic steatosis, a possible small pathological focus in segment II, and focal and partial thrombosis in the intrahepatic inferior vena cava (Fig. 1, 2). Bowel involvement was not detected in the CT scan. Thrombosis of the inferior vena cava was treated with anticoagulation at prophylactic doses due to the patient’s general condition. Laboratory studies were unrevealing except for an increased serum AFP level (246,720 ng/mL; normal range up to 40 ng/mL for adults). A diagnostic paracentesis was performed, disclosing the presence of malignant cells with AFP immunocytochemical expression. A tentative diagnosis of primary hepatic tumor or germ cell tumor (yolk sac) with hepatoid differentiation was established. The case was evaluated by the Gynecologic Oncology Tumor Committee, and given that the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma could not be excluded and a primary yolk sac tumor appeared improbable on imaging findings, magnetic resonance imaging of the liver and a position emission tomography-CT were indicated, which could not be finally performed due to claustrophobia and patient’s refusal. Clinical staging according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) [10] was IIA.

Fig. 1.

Preoperative abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan revealed an abdominopelvic mass with a hypodense cystic-necrotic center (arrow), measuring 18.5 cm oblique to the sagittal plane of probable right adnexal origin, which displaces the uterus to the right and establishes a relationship with the right ovarian vessels. Nontypical image of a germ cell tumor.

Fig. 1.

Preoperative abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan revealed an abdominopelvic mass with a hypodense cystic-necrotic center (arrow), measuring 18.5 cm oblique to the sagittal plane of probable right adnexal origin, which displaces the uterus to the right and establishes a relationship with the right ovarian vessels. Nontypical image of a germ cell tumor.

Close modal
Fig. 2.

Preoperative abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan. In the sagittal plane, there is abundant ascites with slight trabeculation of the peritoneal fat, suspicion of M1, and without significant lymph nodes.

Fig. 2.

Preoperative abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan. In the sagittal plane, there is abundant ascites with slight trabeculation of the peritoneal fat, suspicion of M1, and without significant lymph nodes.

Close modal

During hospital admission, the patient’s clinical status deteriorated due to progressive tumor growth, and on June 13, 2023, she was operated on undergoing a subtotal hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy. There was an adherence of the tumor mass to the sigma (without malignant cell infiltration), but a diverting colostomy was necessary due to intraoperative inadvertent bowel perforation. Total hysterectomy was not performed due to technical difficulties. Postoperatively, she presented hypovolemic shock with rectosigmoid perforation requiring intestinal resection and pararectal colostomy. She was admitted to the intensive care unit, presented a favorable clinical course, and was discharged home.

The histopathological examination of the surgical specimen confirmed a yolk sac tumor (175 × 120 × 105 mm) with multiple tumor foci in the ovary surface and invasion of the fat tissue involving the fallopian tube and the uterine serosa, without evidence of lymphovascular or perineural invasion. Immunohistochemical analysis showed positive expression of AFP, glypican 3, cytokeratin AE1/AE3, and focal SALL4, CK7, PAX8, and WT1 expression (Fig. 3). Other immunohistochemical markers, such as inhibin, calretinin, PLAP, BHCG, CD30, OCT3/4, CK7, CK20, and Ber-Ep4, gave negative results. The definite diagnosis of malignant ovarian primitive germ cell tumor was established, and chemotherapy with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) was proposed, but it was refused by the patient. She was aware of the risks associated with expectant management. Postoperatively, serum levels of AFP decreased progressively to 186 ng/mL at 8 weeks of surgery, 32 ng/mL at 12 weeks, and 2.68 ng/mL at 6 months. Monthly clinical and analytical controls were scheduled, and at present, in June 2024, the patient’s general condition is excellent with good quality of life and the level of AFP is 2.0 ng/mL.

Fig. 3.

Histopathological findings (hematoxylin and eosin. × 20) showing tumors cells with glandular pattern (a) and tumor cells with hepatoid pattern (b). The immunohistochemical staining shows positivity for glypican 3 (c), cytokeratin 7 (CK7) (d), Sal-like protein 4 (SALL4) (e), paired-box gene 8 (PAX8) (f), and Wilms’ tumor gene protein 1 (WT1) (g).

Fig. 3.

Histopathological findings (hematoxylin and eosin. × 20) showing tumors cells with glandular pattern (a) and tumor cells with hepatoid pattern (b). The immunohistochemical staining shows positivity for glypican 3 (c), cytokeratin 7 (CK7) (d), Sal-like protein 4 (SALL4) (e), paired-box gene 8 (PAX8) (f), and Wilms’ tumor gene protein 1 (WT1) (g).

Close modal

The case here reported of a yolk sac tumor in an 80-year-old woman illustrates the occurrence of ovarian germ cell tumors in a very rare age group. The main clinical manifestations were an abdominal mass and ascites. Timely diagnosis is crucial for improved prognosis in these patients. Our patient, however, refused to undergone diagnostic procedures for tumor staging and required surgery for a final histopathological diagnosis. In the differential diagnosis of a large adnexal mass, other forms of rare tumors should be considered, including a mucinous ovarian cancer, embryonal carcinoma, sex cord tumor, immature teratoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and dysgerminoma. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the mass was not performed due to its large tumor, risk of rupture, and positive cytology suggestive of yolk sac tumor. According to FIGO recommendations [10], patients with ovarian germ cell tumors should undergo surgical staging similar to that established for ovarian epithelial cancer. Tumor stage in our patient was pT1N0MX (there was only an adherence of the tumor mass to the sigma without malignant cell infiltration).

In contrast to initial clinical stage and extension of the disease, age is not a negative prognostic factor, although the presence of comorbid diseases associated with advanced age should be taken into account at the time of surgical resection of the tumor. In a review of the Malignant Germ Cell International Consortium dataset of 251 patients (78 children, 139 adolescents, and 34 adults) followed for a median of 5.8 years, the overall 5-year event-free survival and overall survival was 91% and 96%, respectively, and age did not affect risk of event or death, modeled either as a categorical or continuous variable. Also, analysis failed to identify an age cut point that affected risk [11]. However, other studies have reported that ovarian yolk sac tumors in postmenopausal women are characterized by high malignancy and may have a worse prognosis compared with those in younger patients [12]. Surgery and adjuvant BEP chemotherapy is the recommended approach, but without treatment, the prognosis is poor, although the clinical condition of our patient has been favorable and serum AFP decreased after surgery and remained within normal limits in the last follow-up control, 1 year after surgery.

The experience regarding diagnosis, treatment, and outcome in yolk sac tumors in postmenopausal women is limited, with a total of 11 cases reported in the literature [12‒19]. The characteristics of these patients together with those of the present case are summarized in Table 1. The mean age of the patients was 63.4 years (range 52–82 years). With the exception of 2 cases in which serum AFP levels were not reported, the remaining 9 patients had elevated preoperative serum AFP levels, with the highest values of 273,550 ng/mL in 1 case reported by Wang et al. [12] followed by 246,720 ng/mL in our patient. Also, after surgical treatment of tumors, postoperative AFP levels usually decreased to normal limits. In relation to FIGO staging, stage II was the most frequent (41.7%) followed by stage I (33.3%) and stage III (25%). All patients underwent surgical treatment, with cytoreductive surgery as the most common procedure. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed in all cases, with consistent positivity for distinctive diagnostic markers including p53, AFP, SALL4, glypican 3, AE1/3, and CK7. Moreover, all patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, especially the BEP protocol (bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin), although in the case reported by Ahn et al. [13], chemotherapy was refused by the patient as occurred in our case. One patient died [14] and another patient developed pelvic peritoneal recurrence and infiltration in a supraclavicular lymph node [13], whereas in the remaining patients, recurrence was not documented. However, it should be noted that the length of follow-up was mainly limited to some months, except for our patient who remained asymptomatic at the time of last control after 1 year of surgery. This illustrates the favorable course of the disease in the case here reported.

Table 1.

Summary of yolk sac tumors in postmenopausal women reported in the literature

Author, year [reference]Age, yearsAFP levels, ng/mLFIGO stageSurgeryImmunohistochemistry characteristicsChemotherapyFollow-upOutcome
preoppostop
Horiuchi et al. [14] (1998) 53 2,842.4 Normal IA Cytoreductive Positive for p53 Vinblastine, bleomycin, cisplatin, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide 6 months Dead 
Kamoi et al. [18] (2002) 54 13,143.0 Normal IC Cytoreductive Positive for AFP and SALL4 Bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEP) 21 months No recurrence 
Varia et al. [19] (2012) 69 Not stated Normal II Cytoreductive Positive for glypican 3 and AE1/3 Bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEP) April 11, 2012 Not stated 
Negative for AFP, epithelial membrane antigen, CD30, and PLAP 
Chen et al. [15] (2014) 61 11,233 1,482 IC Cytoreductive Positive for AFP, SALL4, and glypican 3 Paclitaxel and carboplatin October 15, 2014 Not stated 
Negative for PAX8, CK7, and EMA 
Parker et al. [20] (2014) 60 11,677 Normal III Cytoreductive Positive for AE1/3, focally for CA125, CDX2, beta hCG and very focally positive for CK7 and CK20 Etoposide and cisplatin 2 cycles, later PMOB/ACE scheme Continue No recurrence 
Negative for p53, WT1, CD10, and CD56 Follow-up 
November 15, 2014 
Kabukcuoglu and Arik [17] (2016) 52 Not stated Normal II Cytoreductive Positive for AFP, COX-2, and cytokeratin Bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEP) 2 months No recurrence 
Negative for CK7, WT1, PAX8, ER, PR, and hCG 
Wang et al. [12] (2018) 61 1,847 293 IIIB Cytoreductive Irregular positivity for SALL4, AFP, EMA, CD99, PR Bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEP) 23 months No recurrence 
Negative for OCT3/4, CD30, p53, S100, and NF 
58 219.7 27.3 IC Cytoreductive Positive for SALL4 and AFP Bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEP) August 17, 2018 No recurrence 
Negative for p53, OCT3/4, napsin A, PR, and ER 
77 273,550 47.2 II Cytoreductive Positive for AFP, SALL4, AE1/AE3, CK7, and p53 Bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEP) 7 months No recurrence 
Negative for PAX8, ER, PR, OCT3/4, and WT1 
Ahn et al. [13] (2020) 82 488.30 Normal II Cytoreductive Positive for glypican 3, SALL4, CK7, and PAX8 Refused 9 months Recurrence (peritoneum, supraclavicular node) 
Short et al. [16] (2022) 54 30,000 12 III Interval hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy Strongly positive for AFP and CK OSCAR Bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEP) 7 months No recurrence 
Weakly positive for CD117 and CD30 
Present case, 2024 80 246,720 186 IIA Subtotal hysterectomy bilateral adnexectomy and diverting colostomy Positive for AFP, glypican 3, cytokeratin AE1/AE3, and focal positivity for SALL4 and CK7 Refused by the patient 1 year (continue follow-up, last visit June 13, 2024) No recurrence 
Author, year [reference]Age, yearsAFP levels, ng/mLFIGO stageSurgeryImmunohistochemistry characteristicsChemotherapyFollow-upOutcome
preoppostop
Horiuchi et al. [14] (1998) 53 2,842.4 Normal IA Cytoreductive Positive for p53 Vinblastine, bleomycin, cisplatin, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide 6 months Dead 
Kamoi et al. [18] (2002) 54 13,143.0 Normal IC Cytoreductive Positive for AFP and SALL4 Bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEP) 21 months No recurrence 
Varia et al. [19] (2012) 69 Not stated Normal II Cytoreductive Positive for glypican 3 and AE1/3 Bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEP) April 11, 2012 Not stated 
Negative for AFP, epithelial membrane antigen, CD30, and PLAP 
Chen et al. [15] (2014) 61 11,233 1,482 IC Cytoreductive Positive for AFP, SALL4, and glypican 3 Paclitaxel and carboplatin October 15, 2014 Not stated 
Negative for PAX8, CK7, and EMA 
Parker et al. [20] (2014) 60 11,677 Normal III Cytoreductive Positive for AE1/3, focally for CA125, CDX2, beta hCG and very focally positive for CK7 and CK20 Etoposide and cisplatin 2 cycles, later PMOB/ACE scheme Continue No recurrence 
Negative for p53, WT1, CD10, and CD56 Follow-up 
November 15, 2014 
Kabukcuoglu and Arik [17] (2016) 52 Not stated Normal II Cytoreductive Positive for AFP, COX-2, and cytokeratin Bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEP) 2 months No recurrence 
Negative for CK7, WT1, PAX8, ER, PR, and hCG 
Wang et al. [12] (2018) 61 1,847 293 IIIB Cytoreductive Irregular positivity for SALL4, AFP, EMA, CD99, PR Bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEP) 23 months No recurrence 
Negative for OCT3/4, CD30, p53, S100, and NF 
58 219.7 27.3 IC Cytoreductive Positive for SALL4 and AFP Bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEP) August 17, 2018 No recurrence 
Negative for p53, OCT3/4, napsin A, PR, and ER 
77 273,550 47.2 II Cytoreductive Positive for AFP, SALL4, AE1/AE3, CK7, and p53 Bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEP) 7 months No recurrence 
Negative for PAX8, ER, PR, OCT3/4, and WT1 
Ahn et al. [13] (2020) 82 488.30 Normal II Cytoreductive Positive for glypican 3, SALL4, CK7, and PAX8 Refused 9 months Recurrence (peritoneum, supraclavicular node) 
Short et al. [16] (2022) 54 30,000 12 III Interval hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy Strongly positive for AFP and CK OSCAR Bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEP) 7 months No recurrence 
Weakly positive for CD117 and CD30 
Present case, 2024 80 246,720 186 IIA Subtotal hysterectomy bilateral adnexectomy and diverting colostomy Positive for AFP, glypican 3, cytokeratin AE1/AE3, and focal positivity for SALL4 and CK7 Refused by the patient 1 year (continue follow-up, last visit June 13, 2024) No recurrence 

AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; preop, preoperative; postop, postoperative; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; p53, protein 53; SALL4, Sal-like protein 4; AE1/3, anti-cytokeratin AE1/AE3 antibody; CD30, cluster of differentiation 30; PLAP, placental alkaline phosphatase; PAX8, paired-box gene 8; CK7, cytokeratin 7; EMA, epithelial membrane antigen; CA125, cancer antigen 125; CDX2, caudal-related homeobox transcription factor; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; CK20, cytokeratin 20; WT1, Wilms’ tumor gene protein 1; CD10, cluster of differentiation 10; CD56, cluster of differentiation 56; PMOB/ACE, cisplatin, vincristine, methotrexate, bleomycin, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, etoposide; COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; CD99, cluster of differentiation 99; OCT3/4, octamer-binding transcription factor 3/4; S100, S100 protein; NF, nuclear factor; CK OSCAR, anti-cytokeratin clone OSCAR.

We presented a very rare case of yolk sac tumor in an octogenarian patient presenting with an abdominopelvic mass and ascites. Very high preoperative serum AFP levels were documented, and she underwent subtotal hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, and diverting colostomy. The definitive diagnosis was established by histopathological examination of the surgical specimen and immunohistochemical detection of positivity for AFP, glypican 3, cytokeratin AE1/AE3, and focal positivity for SALL4 and CK7. The patient refused adjuvant chemotherapy, and 1 year after surgery, she remains in good clinical condition with normal serum AFP levels and absence of signs of tumor recurrence.

The authors thank Dr. Marta Pulido for editing the manuscript and editorial assistance supported by Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili (IISPV).

Declaration of generative AI in scientific writing: the authors declined the use of artificial intelligence, language models, machine learning, or similar technologies to create content or assist with writing or editing of the manuscript. Ethical approval is not required for this study in accordance with local guidelines. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of the details of their medical case and any accompanying images. The CARE Checklist has been completed by the authors for this case report, attached as online supplementary material at https://doi.org/10.1159/000542244.

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

The study is funded by the authors’ own resources.

Vanessa Maldonado and María Masvidal contributed to the design of the report and drafted the manuscript. Vanessa Morente Laguna, Jacqueline Cimerman, and Salvador Mertinez Soriano contributed to the revision of the medical history and critically revised the manuscript. All authors were involved in the care of the patient and contributed at the pathology revision.

The data that support the findings of this study are not publicly available due to their containing information that could compromise the privacy of the research participant but are available from the corresponding author (M.M.).

1.
Gonzalez-Crussi
F
.
The human yolk sac and yolk sac (endodermal sinus) tumors. A review
.
Perspect Pediatr Pathol
.
1979
;
5
:
179
215
.
2.
Arumugam
D
,
Thandavarayan
P
,
Chidambaram
L
,
Boj
S
,
Marudasalam
S
.
Primary nasopharngeal yolk sac tumor: a case report
.
J Clin Diagn Res
.
2016
;
10
(
5
):
ED06
7
.
3.
Stang
A
,
Trabert
B
,
Wentzensen
N
,
Cook
MB
,
Rusner
C
,
Oosterhuis
JW
, et al
.
Gonadal and extragonadal germ cell tumours in the United States, 1973-2007
.
Int J Androl
.
2012
;
35
(
4
):
616
25
.
4.
Iscar
T
,
Arean
C
,
Chiva
L
,
Sanz
J
.
Ovarian yolk sac tumor
.
Int J Gynecol Cancer
.
2021
;
31
(
5
):
797
8
.
5.
Young
RH
,
Wong
A
,
Stall
JN
.
Yolk Sac Tumor of the ovary: a report of 150 cases and review of the literature
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2022
;
46
(
3
):
309
25
.
6.
Cicin
I
,
Saip
P
,
Guney
N
,
Eralp
Y
,
Ayan
I
,
Kebudi
R
, et al
.
Yolk sac tumours of the ovary: evaluation of clinicopathological features and prognostic factors
.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
.
2009
;
146
(
2
):
210
4
.
7.
Kojimahara
T
,
Nakahara
K
,
Takano
T
,
Yaegashi
N
,
Nishiyama
H
,
Fujimori
K
, et al
.
Yolk sac tumor of the ovary: a retrospective multicenter study of 33 Japanese women by Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit (TGCU)
.
Tohoku J Exp Med
.
2013
;
230
(
4
):
211
7
.
8.
Jeyakumar
A
,
Chalas
E
,
Hindenburg
A
.
Sustained complete remission in a patient with platinum-resistant ovarian yolk sac tumor
.
Gynecol Oncol
.
2001
;
82
(
3
):
578
80
.
9.
De La Motte Rouge
T
,
Pautier
P
,
Duvillard
P
,
Rey
A
,
Morice
P
,
Haie-Meder
C
, et al
.
Survival and reproductive function of 52 women treated with surgery and bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy for ovarian yolk sac tumor
.
Ann Oncol
.
2008
;
19
(
8
):
1435
41
.
10.
International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO)
.
Staging for OVFTP malignancies
. Available from: https://www.figo.org/news/staging-ovftp-malignancies (accessed May 24, 2024).
11.
Faure Conter
C
,
Xia
C
,
Gershenson
D
,
Hurteau
J
,
Covens
A
,
Pashankar
F
, et al
.
Ovarian yolk sac tumors; does age matter
.
Int J Gynecol Cancer
.
2018
;
28
(
1
):
77
84
.
12.
Wang
Y
,
Yang
J
,
Yu
M
,
Cao
D
,
Zhang
Y
,
Zong
X
, et al
.
Ovarian yolk sac tumor in postmenopausal females: a case series and a literature review
.
Medicine
.
2018
;
97
(
33
):
e11838
.
13.
Ahn
H
,
Oh
MH
,
Cho
HD
,
Lee
JH
,
Lee
HJ
,
Jeon
S
, et al
.
Ovarian yolk sac tumor with epithelial tumor component in a postmenopausal woman: case report and literature review
.
Int J Clin Exp Pathol
.
2020
;
13
(
9
):
2401
6
.
14.
Horiuchi
A
,
Osada
R
,
Nakayama
K
,
Toki
T
,
Nikaido
T
,
Fujii
S
.
Ovarian yolk sac tumor with endometrioid carcinoma arising from endometriosis in a postmenopausal woman, with special reference to expression of alpha-fetoprotein, sex steroid receptors, and p53
.
Gynecol Oncol
.
1998
;
70
(
2
):
295
9
.
15.
Chen
Q
,
Chen
X
.
Bilateral ovarian mixed epithelial adenocarcinoma in a postmenopausal woman with unilateral ovarian yolk sac tumor component
.
Int J Clin Exp Pathol
.
2014
;
7
(
11
):
8259
65
.
16.
Short
R
,
Greenwade
M
,
Bonebrake
A
.
Yolk sac tumor presenting as a colonic mass in a post-menopausal woman: a case report
.
Gynecol Oncol Rep
.
2022
;
42
:
101038
.
17.
Kabukcuoglu
S
,
Arik
D
.
Ovarian endometrioid carcinoma with yolk sac tumor component in a postmenopausal woman
.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol
.
2016
;
37
(
6
):
867
9
.
18.
Kamoi
S
,
Ohaki
Y
,
Mori
O
,
Okada
S
,
Seto
M
,
Matsushita
N
, et al
.
A case of ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma with yolk sac tumor component in a postmenopausal woman
.
APMIS
.
2002
;
110
(
6
):
508
14
.
19.
Varia
M
,
McCluggage
WG
,
Oommen
R
.
High grade serous carcinoma of the ovary with a yolk sac tumour component in a postmenopausal woman: report of an extremely rare phenomenon
.
J Clin Pathol
.
2012
;
65
(
9
):
853
4
.
20.
Parker
VL
,
Sanderson
P
,
Naik
V
,
Quincey
C
,
Farag
K
.
Post-menopausal presentation of yolk sac germ cell tumour
.
Gynecol Oncol Rep
.
2015
;
11
:
16
9
.