The most important driver gene in malignant melanoma is the BRAF mutation, and molecularly targeted therapies targeting mutations, mainly V600E and V600k, are used in clinical practice. In this report, we treated a patient with malignant melanoma expressing a rare BRAF-ZKSCAN5 fusion gene with dabrafenib/trametinib. The patient was a 71-year-old female. She was diagnosed with malignant melanoma (pT4aN3M0, STAGE IIIC) of the abdomen with axillary lymph node metastasis. She underwent extended resection and axillary lymph node dissection and was treated with adjuvant therapy, but lung and mediastinal lymph node metastases developed. The patient was treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic lesions and achieved complete remission, but relapsed and metastatic lesions appeared in the cervical lymph nodes. Next-generation sequencing revealed the BRAF-ZKSCAN5 fusion gene, and treatment with dabrafenib/trametinib was initiated. After 1 month of treatment, tumor growth stopped and the length of the tumor shrank by 22.2%, but she developed grade 3 adverse events of nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea and had difficulty exercising, forcing her to discontinue treatment after 6 weeks. The tumor continued to shrink during drug administration. This case report may provide insight into treatment options for cases in which the BRAF fusion gene was observed, which is expected to be detected in large numbers by next-generation sequencing in the future.

Several genetic mutations have been reported in malignant melanoma that are targets for therapy, the most important of which are BRAF mutations, which are driver genes for tumor cell growth and are generally expressed in the V600 region [1]. This gene mutation is known to be found in cancers other than melanoma, such as biliary tract and lung cancer, and the benefit of molecularly targeted therapies has also been reported [2, 3]. The most common of these mutations is in the V600E region, but several other mutations have been reported in recent years [4]. In this study, we report a case of melanoma expressing the BRAF-ZKSCAN fusion gene that was successfully treated with dabrafenib/trametinib.

With the development of cancer genome research, has identified various melanoma driver genes have been identified [5]. We report a case of melanoma expressing the BRAF-ZKSCAN5 fusion gene that was treated with dabrafenib/trametinib. The patient was a 71-year-old female. She underwent extended resection and axillary lymph node dissection for abdominal malignant melanoma in the abdomen with axillary lymph node metastasis (pT4aN3M0, STAGE IIIC) and received peginterferon-α as postoperative adjuvant therapy (Fig. 1). Lung and mediastinal lymph node metastases were detected 2 months after surgery, and she was treated with nivolumab. Her metastatic lesions remained stable for 2 years, but then increased in number 2 years after the initial treatment. The combination of treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab was started as second-line therapy. Although the patient achieved a complete response at the first posttreatment evaluation, she developed bullous pemphigoid with a mucocutaneous rash after the second administration, and the ipilimumab/nivolumab treatment was discontinued. After remission of the bullous pemphigoid, treatment with pembrolizumab was started. No tumor relapse was observed during the first year of treatment, but cervical lymph node metastases appeared and gradually increased. At that time, the other lesions continued to shrink. Therefore, radiotherapy (electron beam, 66 Gy) was applied to the cervical lymph node, leading to a partial response (Fig. 2). At 4 months after the completion of radiotherapy, the tumor was enlarged (Fig. 3). Next-generation sequencing with FoundationOne® CDx detected the gene for the BRAF-ZKSCAN5 fusion protein, leading to treatment with dabrafenib/trametinib. At 1-month posttreatment, the tumor had stopped growing and the long diameter was reduced by 22.2% (Fig. 4). The patient developed grade 3 adverse events of nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea, which caused movement difficulties and forced the discontinuation of treatment 6 weeks. A chronology was created from a timeline of events that occurred with this patient (Table 1).

Fig. 1.

Dissected right axillary lymph nodes showing gross metastasis.

Fig. 1.

Dissected right axillary lymph nodes showing gross metastasis.

Close modal
Fig. 2.

CT scan of the neck after radiotherapy: arrow indicates lymph node with a long diameter of 23.5 mm.

Fig. 2.

CT scan of the neck after radiotherapy: arrow indicates lymph node with a long diameter of 23.5 mm.

Close modal
Fig. 3.

CT scan of the neck 4 months after the completion of radiotherapy; lymph node diameter increased to 35.3 mm.

Fig. 3.

CT scan of the neck 4 months after the completion of radiotherapy; lymph node diameter increased to 35.3 mm.

Close modal
Fig. 4.

Cervical CT 1 month after dabrafenib/trametinib administration; lymph node long diameter reduced to 27.5 mm.

Fig. 4.

Cervical CT 1 month after dabrafenib/trametinib administration; lymph node long diameter reduced to 27.5 mm.

Close modal
Table 1.

Time line of events that occurred with this patient

DateEvent
Aug/20XX Initial medical evaluation 
Sep/20XX Extended resection, axillary lymph node dissection 
Oct/20XX Peginterferon-alpha started 
Dec/20XX Pulmonary metastasis and mediastinal lymph node metastasis appear 
Jan/20XY Nivolumab started 
Multiple subcutaneous metastases were resected, but no metastases other than subcutaneous for 3 years 
Feb/20XZ Multiple lung metastases appeared 
Mar/20XZ Started ipilimumab and nivolumab 
May/20XZ Onset of bullous pemphigoid 
Jun/20XZ Started pembrolizumab 
No disease progression for 1 year 
Jun/20XA Onset of cervical lymph node metastases 
Aug/20XA Started radiation therapy to cervical lymph nodes 
Dec/20XA Shrunken cervical lymph nodes re-enlarged, dabrafenib/trametinib started 
Jan/20XB Dabrafenib/trametinib discontinued due to nausea symptoms 
DateEvent
Aug/20XX Initial medical evaluation 
Sep/20XX Extended resection, axillary lymph node dissection 
Oct/20XX Peginterferon-alpha started 
Dec/20XX Pulmonary metastasis and mediastinal lymph node metastasis appear 
Jan/20XY Nivolumab started 
Multiple subcutaneous metastases were resected, but no metastases other than subcutaneous for 3 years 
Feb/20XZ Multiple lung metastases appeared 
Mar/20XZ Started ipilimumab and nivolumab 
May/20XZ Onset of bullous pemphigoid 
Jun/20XZ Started pembrolizumab 
No disease progression for 1 year 
Jun/20XA Onset of cervical lymph node metastases 
Aug/20XA Started radiation therapy to cervical lymph nodes 
Dec/20XA Shrunken cervical lymph nodes re-enlarged, dabrafenib/trametinib started 
Jan/20XB Dabrafenib/trametinib discontinued due to nausea symptoms 

BRAF mutations, involving the driver gene for tumor cell growth, are usually observed in the V600 region [6]. In this case, a fusion gene related to BRAF was expressed. The efficacy of BRAF/MEK inhibitors in such cases is well established [7]. In addition, the efficacy of the BRAF/MEK inhibitor for brain metastases from melanoma was also reported in BRAFi naive patients with an overall response rate of 67.3%, median overall survival of 20.0 months, and median progression-free survival of 7.5 months compared to previous treatment modalities [8]. Although there are some case reports of BRAF fusion genes in various tumors other than melanoma, no BRAF-targeted therapies for melanoma have been reported [9, 10]. Previous basic research on melanoma cells reported that the efficacy of BRAF inhibitors is specific to the fusion gene type [11]. In another case report, a MEK inhibitor was administered to a case of malignant melanoma expressing the GOLGA4-RAF1 fusion gene, and efficacy was achieved [12]. Similarly, in our case, the efficacy of dabrafenib/trametinib was observed during short-term administration in our case, and the results suggest that the BRAF-ZKSCAN5 fusion gene is a potential target gene for the treatment of melanoma. Although many variations of BRAF fusion genes are known, the effects of molecularly targeted therapeutics on each fusion gene remain unclear. As cancer genomic testing becomes more widespread in the future, it is expected that multiple such genes will be detected. This case report may provide evidence for treatment options for cases with BRAF fusion gene detection, which is expected to be detected in large numbers by next-generation sequencing in the future. It is important to accumulate such reports while conducting basic research to deepen our understanding of the effects of drugs on each target molecule. The CARE Checklist has been completed by the authors for this case report, available online at https://doi.org/10.1159/000533822.

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of the details of their medical case and any accompanying images. In addition, the administration of dabrafenib/trametinib in this case was reviewed and approved review by the Ethics Committee of Nagoya City University Hospital (approval #2021-33).

Kato H. has received speakers’ bureau from Novartis Pharma K.K.

The authors received no funding from any source for the preparation of this article.

Kato H. wrote the case report. Kato H., Kano S., Yasui Y., Nojiri Y., Yoshimitsu M., and Nakamura M. contributed to the clinical management of this patient. Morita A. contributed to critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content.

1.
Kim
SY
,
Kim
SN
,
Hahn
HJ
,
Lee
YW
,
Choe
YB
,
Ahn
KJ
.
Metaanalysis of BRAF mutations and clinicopathologic characteristics in primary melanoma
.
J Am Acad Dermatol
.
2015 Jun
72
6
1036
46.e2
.
2.
Rizzo
A
,
Ricci
AD
,
Tober
N
,
Nigro
MC
,
Mosca
M
,
Palloni
A
.
Second-line treatment in advanced biliary tract cancer: today and tomorrow
.
Anticancer Res
.
2020 Jun
40
6
3013
30
.
3.
Lamberti
G
,
Andrini
E
,
Sisi
M
,
Rizzo
A
,
Parisi
C
,
Di Federico
A
.
Beyond EGFR, ALK and ROS1: current evidence and future perspectives on newly targetable oncogenic drivers in lung adenocarcinoma
.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol
.
2020 Dec
156
103119
.
4.
Menzer
C
,
Menzies
AM
,
Carlino
MS
,
Reijers
I
,
Groen
EJ
,
Eigentler
T
.
Targeted therapy in advanced melanoma with rare BRAF mutations
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2019 Nov 20
37
33
3142
51
.
5.
Komatsu-Fujii
T
,
Nomura
M
,
Otsuka
A
,
Ishida
Y
,
Doi
K
,
Matsumoto
S
.
Response to imatinib in vaginal melanoma with KIT p.Val559Gly mutation previously treated with nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and ipilimumab
.
J Dermatol
.
2019 Jun
46
6
e203
e204
.
6.
Ascierto
PA
,
Kirkwood
JM
,
Grob
JJ
,
Simeone
E
,
Grimaldi
AM
,
Maio
M
.
The role of BRAF V600 mutation in melanoma
.
J Transl Med
.
2012 Jul 9
10
85
.
7.
Robert
C
,
Karaszewska
B
,
Schachter
J
,
Rutkowski
P
,
Mackiewicz
A
,
Stroiakovski
D
.
Improved overall survival in melanoma with combined dabrafenib and trametinib
.
N Engl J Med
.
2015 Jan 1
372
1
30
9
.
8.
Atkinson
V
,
Sandhu
S
,
Hospers
G
,
Long
GV
,
Aglietta
M
,
Ferrucci
PF
.
Dabrafenib plus trametinib is effective in the treatment of BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma patients: analysis of patients from the dabrafenib plus trametinib Named Patient Program (DESCRIBE II)
.
Melanoma Res
.
2020 Jun
30
3
261
7
.
9.
Helgager
J
,
Lidov
HG
,
Mahadevan
NR
,
Kieran
MW
,
Ligon
KL
,
Alexandrescu
S
.
A novel GIT2-BRAF fusion in pilocytic astrocytoma
.
Diagn Pathol
.
2017 Nov 15
12
1
82
.
10.
Bubola
J
,
Antonescu
CR
,
Weinreb
I
,
Swanson
D
,
De Almeida
JR
,
MacMillan
CM
.
A novel low-grade nasopharyngeal adenocarcinoma characterized by a GOLGB1-BRAF fusion gene
.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
.
2021 Jan
60
1
49
53
.
11.
Botton
T
,
Talevich
E
,
Mishra
VK
,
Zhang
T
,
Shain
AH
,
Berquet
C
.
Genetic heterogeneity of BRAF fusion kinases in melanoma affects drug responses
.
Cell Rep
.
2019 Oct 15
29
3
573
88.e7
.
12.
McEvoy
CR
,
Xu
H
,
Smith
K
,
Etemadmoghadam
D
,
San Leong
H
,
Choong
DY
.
Profound MEK inhibitor response in a cutaneous melanoma harboring a GOLGA4-RAF1 fusion
.
J Clin Invest
.
2019 May 1
129
5
1940
5
.