A family with multiple members diagnosed with prostate cancer was identified, and genetic variants were analyzed. Three brothers were diagnosed with prostate cancer. Germline variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, TINF2, and CD19 were found through next-generation DNA sequencing using a hereditary cancer panel. The BRCA1 G275D variant was present in patients, but absent in the healthy member. An ELAC2 variant was found in 1 patient. Several mutations were predicted to be deleterious by a set of computation programs. Multiple gene mutations might contribute to the overall predisposition to prostate cancer in the family. Even in cases with potentially deleterious variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2, there could be diverse clinical manifestations.

Prostate cancer (Pca) is one of the most common cancers in men in the USA. In China, Pca is among the top 10 of the most common cancers in men [1]. About 10% of Pca was considered hereditary [2, 3]. Some common genes of which mutations cause predisposition to Pca include BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, ATM, HOXB13, BRIP, PALB2, and mismatch repair genes (MMR) [2-4]. The American College of Medical Genetics recommend genetic testing when three or more first-degree relatives are with Pca or two or more first-degree relatives are diagnosed with Pca at age 55 or younger [5]. We performed genetic analysis of a family in which three out of four brothers suffered from Pca and found variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2, together with some other putatively related genes, and the clinical characteristics also less aggressive.

Two brothers were diagnosed with Pca in 2020 at the local hospital through prostate biopsies and pathological exams. Main symptom is difficulty in urination. History tracing revealed that another brother from the family was also diagnosed with Pca a few years ago, but lost contact since then. Pca was not diagnosed before the age of 60. One brother remains healthy. The family pedigree is shown in Figure 1.

Fig. 1.

Family pedigree. *This subject was out of contact.

Fig. 1.

Family pedigree. *This subject was out of contact.

Close modal

Blood specimens were taken from the three brothers available for genetic tests with consent. NGS was performed with a hereditary panel of 219 predisposition genes in cancers. The gene list of the panel and experimental details are provided in online supplementary file S1 (for all online suppl. material, see www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000521122). Six rare germline gene variants were identified, and all were of heterozygous type (Table 1). All variants were verified by Sanger sequencing. No other variants were found in CHEK2, ATM, BRIP1, PALB2, HOXB13, or other MMR genes. Panel gene list, NGS experimental, and bioinformatics details are given in online supplementary File 1. BRCA1 G275D was noticeably absent in the healthy brother but present in the two brothers with Pca, while BRCA1 V2109I was found in all the three brothers (Table 1).

Table 1.

Distribution of rare germline variants from NGS

Distribution of rare germline variants from NGS
Distribution of rare germline variants from NGS

All variants were rare with population allele frequencies between 0.001 and 0.01 (Table 2). Population frequency information for TINF2 was absent from the databases. NGS data from over 200 Pca patients collected in the laboratory were also analyzed, and the BRCA1 variant was found in another patient with Pca, and no other BRCA1 or BRCA2 variant was found recurrent except the family in this report.

Table 2.

Population frequencies of the variants

Population frequencies of the variants
Population frequencies of the variants

The functional consequences of the variants were analyzed by some commonly used in silico tools, SIFT, Polyphen2, MutationTaster, MutationAssessor, and Provean [6]. The predicted effects are summarized in Table 3. The results show that the BRCA1 G275D might have a higher functional impact, and the BRCA2 V2109I might have limited functional effect. The glycine at position 275 of BRCA1 is conserved among multiple species, including human, monkey, and mouse (data not shown). None of the variants was classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic in the Clinvar database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/).

Table 3.

Functional effect prediction by computational programs

Functional effect prediction by computational programs
Functional effect prediction by computational programs

In this family, Pca was not diagnosed before the age of 60. One brother remains healthy at the age over 70. The two brothers with Pca with clinical information available had adenoma of the prostate by pathological exams, and the Gleason scores were 6 and 7, respectively. No metastasis was found. PSA level was between 4 and 10 ng/mL. Both received radical prostatectomy treatment, and the disease remain stable with PSA less than 4 ng/mL up to the point of this report.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are tumor suppressors, involved in cellular DNA damage repair. BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene germline mutations are the most common and major drivers of familial Pca [2-4, 7, 8]. The types of BRCA2 gene germline mutations include frameshift (64%), missense (31%), and splicing (5%). For the BRCA1 gene, the mutation types are missense (63%), frameshift (31%), and splicing (6%) [7]. It is estimated that germline mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 could increase Pca risk by 3.8- and 8.6-fold, respectively [9, 10]. Clinically, Pcas in BRCA-mutated carriers are associated with early onset, higher Gleason score, more aggressive clinical course, and shorter survival time [9, 11, 12]. Pca patients with mutations in DNA damage repair genes respond favorably to PARP inhibitors such as olaparib and rucaparib [13]. In this family however, the onset of age is older than 60 years old. Gleason scores and PSA level were at moderate levels. Aggressive clinical features were not shown.

In summary, multiple brothers in this family were diagnosed with Pca, and BRCA1 G275D appeared having high impact on the pathogenesis. Early onset and aggressive clinical manifestations did not display in this family. It appears that at least in some families, variants in multiple genes might contribute together to the predisposition to Pca, and even in cases with potentially deleterious variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2, there could be diverse clinical manifestations.

Authors would like to thank Peng Jiang, Wenhong He, Yao Yao, and Lushuai Yao for assistance in the material collection and analysis.

The subjects of this case report have given their written informed consent for the study and for publication of the research findings. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Affiliated Wuxi No. 2 Hospital, Nanjing Medical University.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

The study was supported in part by Jiangsu Social Development Grant, BE2018629 (N.H.F.).

Project conception and overall organization of the research: N.H.F., F.P.L., and Q.S.S.; clinical materials and information collection: X.Y.X. and Y.W.; experimental design and performing data analysis and manuscript preparation: K.C.Z.

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

1.
Zhu
Y
,
Mo
M
,
Wei
Y
,
Wu
J
,
Pan
J
,
Freedland
SJ
,
Epidemiology and genomics of prostate cancer in Asian men
.
Nat Rev Urol
.
2021
;
18
(
5
):
282
301
.
2.
Vietri
MT
,
D’Elia
G
,
Caliendo
G
,
Resse
M
,
Casamassimi
A
,
Passariello
L
,
Hereditary prostate cancer: genes related, target therapy and prevention
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2021
;
22
(
7
):
3753
.
3.
Zhen
JT
,
Syed
J
,
Nguyen
KA
,
Leapman
MS
,
Agarwal
N
,
Brierley
K
,
Genetic testing for hereditary prostate cancer: current status and limitations
.
Cancer
.
2018
;
124
(
15
):
3105
17
.
4.
Dias
A
,
Kote-Jarai
Z
,
Mikropoulos
C
,
Eeles
R
.
Prostate cancer germline variations and implications for screening and treatment
.
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med
.
2018
;
8
(
9
):
a030379
. .
5.
Hampel
H
,
Bennett
RL
,
Buchanan
A
,
Pearlman
R
,
Wiesner
GL
, ,
Guideline Development Group
.
A practice guideline from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors: referral indications for cancer predisposition assessment
.
Genet Med
.
2015
;
17
(
1
):
70
87
.
6.
Pshennikova
VG
,
Barashkov
NA
,
Romanov
GP
,
Teryutin
FM
,
Solov’ev
AV
,
Gotovtsev
NN
,
Comparison of predictive in silico tools on missense variants in GJB2, GJB6, and GJB3 genes associated with autosomal recessive deafness 1A (DFNB1A)
.
ScientificWorldJournal
.
2019
;
2019
:
5198931
.
7.
Brandao
A
,
Paulo
P
,
Teixeira
MR
.
Hereditary predisposition to prostate cancer: from genetics to clinical implications
.
Int J Mol Sci
.
2020
;
21
(
14
):
5036
.
8.
Doan
DK
,
Schmidt
KT
,
Chau
CH
,
Figg
WD
.
Germline genetics of prostate cancer: prevalence of risk variants and clinical implications for disease management
.
Cancers
.
2021
;
13
(
9
):
2154
. .
9.
Castro
E
,
Goh
C
,
Olmos
D
,
Saunders
E
,
Leongamornlert
D
,
Tymrakiewicz
M
,
Germline BRCA mutations are associated with higher risk of nodal involvement, distant metastasis, and poor survival outcomes in prostate cancer
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2013
;
31
(
14
):
1748
57
.
10.
Leongamornlert
D
,
Mahmud
N
,
Tymrakiewicz
M
,
Saunders
E
,
Dadaev
T
,
Castro
E
,
Germline BRCA1 mutations increase prostate cancer risk
.
Br J Cancer
.
2012
;
106
(
10
):
1697
701
.
11.
Gallagher
DJ
,
Gaudet
MM
,
Pal
P
,
Kirchhoff
T
,
Balistreri
L
,
Vora
K
,
Germline BRCA mutations denote a clinicopathologic subset of prostate cancer
.
Clin Cancer Res
.
2010
;
16
(
7
):
2115
21
.
12.
Lee
MV
,
Katabathina
VS
,
Bowerson
ML
,
Mityul
MI
,
Shetty
AS
,
Elsayes
KM
,
BRCA-associated cancers: role of imaging in screening, diagnosis, and management
.
Radiographics
.
2017
;
37
(
4
):
1005
23
.
13.
Risdon
EN
,
Chau
CH
,
Price
DK
,
Sartor
O
,
Figg
WD
.
PARP inhibitors and prostate cancer: to infinity and beyond BRCA
.
Oncologist
.
2021
;
26
(
1
):
e115
29
. .
Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.