The c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) fusion gene is a rare genomic alteration detected in nearly 1–2% of lung adenocarcinomas. The major partner genes of ROS1 include CD74, SDC4, and EZR. Here, we report a case of MYH9-ROS1 fusion gene-positive lung adenocarcinoma, a rare ROS1 fusion gene. The patient was a woman in her 40s who was diagnosed with advanced primary lung adenocarcinoma after a thorough examination. Initial genetic testing conducted using mediastinal lymph node biopsy specimens collected by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration revealed no driver gene mutations, including the ROS1 fusion gene. The patient was treated with four courses of immunochemotherapy. As the disease worsened, another genetic test was conducted using FoundationOne® CDx, and the MYH9-ROS1 fusion gene was detected. Multiple lung metastases disappeared after the administration of entrectinib; the response persisted up to a year. Adverse events of rash, dysgeusia, and peripheral edema were observed, and the patient required temporary drug interruption; however, we were able to continue entrectinib following a short-term drug interruption. This is the first report on the effectiveness of entrectinib against lung adenocarcinoma with the rare MYH9-ROS1 fusion gene.

The c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) fusion gene is a rare genomic alteration detected in 1–2% of lung adenocarcinomas [1]; the major ROS1 fusion partner genes include CD74, SDC4, and EZR [2]. Two drugs, crizotinib and entrectinib, have proven to be effective against ROS1 fusion gene-positive nonsmall-cell lung cancer [3, 4]. The MYH9 gene encodes the heavy chain of nonmuscle myosin IIA, a cytoplasmic myosin that plays a role in processes requiring the generation of intracellular chemomechanical force and translocation of the actin cytoskeleton; MYH9 variants are associated with cancer [5]. MYH9 is a rare fusion partner of ROS1 [6]; however, the efficacy of drugs against this fusion is not well understood. In addition, because this fusion gene is rare, several conventional tests fail to detect it. Here, we report a case in which the MYH9-ROS1 fusion gene initially went undetected but was later detected using FoundationOne® CDx, a hybrid-capture-based diagnostic method, and the patient responded well to treatment with entrectinib.

A woman in her 40s visited Respiratory Medicine of Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital because of abnormal shadows on a chest radiograph. The patient had no history of smoking, no significant medical history, and no family history of cancer. She complained of lower abdominal pain; a chest radiograph was ordered as part of the examination. The X-ray revealed left pleural effusion and enhanced left hilar shadowing. Lung cancer was suspected upon examination, and metastases were found in the lungs, colon, systemic bone, lymph nodes, pleura, and peritoneum. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration was performed on the mediastinal lymph nodes, and thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1)-positive adenocarcinoma tissue was collected. An OncomineTM Dx Target Test (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was performed on the adenocarcinoma tissue sample, and no driver gene abnormalities were detected. The patient was then started on immunochemotherapy with carboplatin, paclitaxel, bevacizumab, and atezolizumab. The disease progressed to a stable disease at the end of two courses but exhibited worsened multiple lung metastases and a bladder tumor at the end of four courses. We performed a transurethral resection of the bladder tumor and histologically diagnosed it as bladder metastasis of the lung adenocarcinoma (shown in Fig. 1). The tumor specimen was tested using FoundationOne® CDx (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA) and was found to be positive for the MYH9-ROS1 fusion gene. Subsequently, the patient was prescribed entrectinib 600 mg/day, which resulted in a significant change; a week later, computed tomography revealed shrinkage of multiple lung metastases and the bladder tumor. The patient required temporary drug interruption for a week because of the appearance of a generalized erythema; her condition improved, and the disease did not relapse after restarting entrectinib. The cancerous lesions throughout the body disappeared after restarting entrectinib, resulting in a complete response; this effect was sustained for a year (shown in Fig. 2). The entire course of this patient is shown in Figure 3.

Fig. 1.

Histopathological images of biopsy samples from the patient. a Mediastinal lymph node specimen showing large, polygonal, atypical cells proliferating in sheets. The atypical cells showed TTF-1 positivity upon immunohistochemical staining. b Bladder tumor biopsy specimen showing enriched atypical cells and cord-like proliferation. The atypical cells showed TTF-1 positivity upon immunohistochemical staining.

Fig. 1.

Histopathological images of biopsy samples from the patient. a Mediastinal lymph node specimen showing large, polygonal, atypical cells proliferating in sheets. The atypical cells showed TTF-1 positivity upon immunohistochemical staining. b Bladder tumor biopsy specimen showing enriched atypical cells and cord-like proliferation. The atypical cells showed TTF-1 positivity upon immunohistochemical staining.

Close modal
Fig. 2.

Computed tomography images through the course of treatment. a At first visit. b At the end of immunochemotherapy (before starting entrectinib). Pleural effusion decreased, but multiple lung metastases worsened and the appearance of a bladder tumor was observed. A ureteral stent was inserted. c One week after starting entrectinib. The previously observed multiple lung metastases and bladder tumor largely disappeared. d One year later. Response to entrectinib was sustained.

Fig. 2.

Computed tomography images through the course of treatment. a At first visit. b At the end of immunochemotherapy (before starting entrectinib). Pleural effusion decreased, but multiple lung metastases worsened and the appearance of a bladder tumor was observed. A ureteral stent was inserted. c One week after starting entrectinib. The previously observed multiple lung metastases and bladder tumor largely disappeared. d One year later. Response to entrectinib was sustained.

Close modal
Fig. 3.

Progress of the patient during the course of the treatment. Tumor markers decreased markedly after starting entrectinib (600 mg/day). After 2 weeks of entrectinib treatment, the patient developed generalized erythema and entrectinib was withdrawn for 1 week, following which erythema improved and entrectinib was resumed (at 600 mg/day) without relapse. After this, the patient showed acute cellulitis and edema; however, entrectinib treatment was continued without any major adverse events. CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; TUR-Bt, transurethral resection of bladder tumor.

Fig. 3.

Progress of the patient during the course of the treatment. Tumor markers decreased markedly after starting entrectinib (600 mg/day). After 2 weeks of entrectinib treatment, the patient developed generalized erythema and entrectinib was withdrawn for 1 week, following which erythema improved and entrectinib was resumed (at 600 mg/day) without relapse. After this, the patient showed acute cellulitis and edema; however, entrectinib treatment was continued without any major adverse events. CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; TUR-Bt, transurethral resection of bladder tumor.

Close modal

Herein, we report a case of a rare MYH9-ROS1 fusion gene-positive lung adenocarcinoma. The ROS1 fusion gene is a rare genomic alteration detected in 1–2% of lung adenocarcinomas [1]. The efficacy and safety of entrectinib for ROS1 fusion-positive nonsmall-cell lung cancer have already been demonstrated in the STARTREK trial; however, the trial did not include MYH9-ROS1 fusion [4]. We report that a patient with MYH9-ROS1 fusion gene-positive lung adenocarcinoma was treated with entrectinib and responded well to the treatment.

MYH9 is a rare partner of the ROS1 fusion gene and occurs in approximately 1% of ROS1 fusion cases [6, 7]. MYH9 has also been reported as a rare fusion partner for other genes such as ALK, RET, and NTRK [8-10]. When the patient’s adenocarcinoma sample tested negative for driver mutations, we started treatment with cytotoxic anticancer agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors; however, the response was unsatisfactory. We then used FoundationOne® CDx, a hybrid-capture-based technology, which detected the MYH9-ROS1 fusion gene. As MYH9 is a rare gene fusion partner, it is undetectable by amplicon methods such as OncomineTM owing to a lack of coverage [11]. In Japan, the AmoyDx® ROS1 fusion test kit is also available for detecting the ROS1 fusion gene; however, it does not detect the MYH9-ROS1 fusion gene [12]. Due to the limitations of these methods, detection of the MYH9-ROS1 fusion gene was possible using FoundationOne® CDx in our case, as the hybrid-capture method was capable of detecting unknown or rare fusion partners.

The patient experienced multiple side effects after starting entrectinib treatment, including the appearance of a skin rash. The patient was initially administered an immune checkpoint inhibitor when the fusion gene was not detected, followed by entrectinib treatment. Response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in a case of MYH9-ROS1 fusion gene-positive nonsmall-cell lung cancer has been reported before [13]; however, atezolizumab had no effect in our case. Moreover, severe adverse events such as skin rashes have been reported with the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as alectinib and vemurafenib, after immune checkpoint inhibitors [14, 15]. We postulate that treatment with entrectinib post-immunochemotherapy had a similar effect in our patient and should be used cautiously.

In conclusion, we successfully identified a case of lung adenocarcinoma with the MYH9-ROS1 fusion gene as the driver mutation, using FoundationOne® CDx. As demonstrated in this report, the use of hybrid-capture-based next-generation sequencing methods can be advantageous over conventional tests for the detection of unknown or rare fusion genes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the use of entrectinib for the treatment of MYH9-ROS1 rare fusion gene-positive lung adenocarcinoma. The patient showed a good treatment response, and entrectinib could be an effective therapy for lung adenocarcinoma with this rare fusion gene.

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

This study protocol was reviewed and approved by Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Ethics Committee, approval number 62-19. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Takeshi Tsuda received an honorarium from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding was received from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and MSD K.K. These sources were not involved in the preparation of data or the manuscript.

Takeshi Tsuda, Naoki Takata, Takahiro Hirai, Yasuaki Masaki, and Hirokazu Taniguchi treated the patients. Shin Ishizawa performed histopathological analysis. Hirokazu Taniguchi overviewed this study.

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

1.
Bergethon
K
,
Shaw
AT
,
Ou
SH
,
Katayama
R
,
Lovly
CM
,
McDonald
NT
,
ROS1 rearrangements define a unique molecular class of lung cancers
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2012
;
30
(
8
):
863
70
.
2.
Rozenblum
AB
,
Ilouze
M
,
Dudnik
E
,
Dvir
A
,
Soussan-Gutman
L
,
Geva
S
,
Clinical impact of hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing on changes in treatment decisions in lung cancer
.
J Thorac Oncol
.
2017
;
12
(
2
):
258
68
.
3.
Shaw
AT
,
Ou
SH
,
Bang
YJ
,
Camidge
DR
,
Solomon
BJ
,
Salgia
R
,
Crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer
.
N Engl J Med
.
2014
;
371
(
21
):
1963
71
.
4.
Drilon
A
,
Siena
S
,
Dziadziuszko
R
,
Barlesi
F
,
Krebs
MG
,
Shaw
AT
,
Entrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: integrated analysis of three phase 1–2 trials
.
Lancet Oncol
.
2020
;
21
(
2
):
261
70
.
5.
Pecci
A
,
Ma
X
,
Savoia
A
,
Adelstein
RS
.
MYH9: structure, functions and role of non-muscle myosin IIA in human disease
.
Gene
.
2018
;
664
:
152
67
. .
6.
Cui
M
,
Han
Y
,
Li
P
,
Zhang
J
,
Ou
Q
,
Tong
X
,
Molecular and clinicopathological characteristics of ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancers identified by next-generation sequencing
.
Mol Oncol
.
2020
;
14
(
11
):
2787
95
.
7.
Xu
H
,
Zhang
Q
,
Liang
L
,
Li
J
,
Liu
Z
,
Li
W
,
Crizotinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with different ROS1 fusion variants
.
Cancer Med
.
2020
;
9
(
10
):
3328
36
.
8.
Lamant
L
,
Gascoyne
RD
,
Duplantier
MM
,
Armstrong
F
,
Raghab
A
,
Chhanabhai
M
,
Non-muscle myosin heavy chain (MYH9): a new partner fused to ALK in anaplastic large cell lymphoma
.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
.
2003
;
37
(
4
):
427
32
.
9.
Sun
Y
,
Pei
L
,
Luo
N
,
Chen
D
,
Meng
L
.
A novel MYH9-RET fusion occurrence and EGFR T790M loss as an acquired resistance mechanism to Osimertinib in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma: a case report
.
Onco Targets Ther
.
2020
;
13
:
11177
81
. .
10.
Yeh
I
,
Tee
MK
,
Botton
T
,
Shain
AH
,
Sparatta
AJ
,
Gagnon
A
,
NTRK3 kinase fusions in Spitz tumours
.
J Pathol
.
2016
;
240
(
3
):
282
90
.
11.
Oncomine Dx target test part I: test description and performance characteristics USER GUIDE
. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf16/P160045S019C.pdf.
12.
13.
Jain
A
,
Fujioka
N
,
Patel
M
.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors in ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: a report of two cases
.
J Thorac Oncol
.
2019
;
14
(
8
):
e165
7
. .
14.
Uhara
H
,
Kiyohara
Y
,
Tsuda
A
,
Takata
M
,
Yamazaki
N
.
Characteristics of adverse drug reactions in a vemurafenib early post-marketing phase vigilance study in Japan
.
Clin Transl Oncol
.
2018
;
20
(
2
):
169
75
. .
15.
Nishiyama
A
,
Hattori
Y
,
Takeuchi
S
,
Tanimoto
A
,
Satouchi
M
,
Murayama
T
,
Severe skin toxicity caused by sequential anti-PD-1 antibody and Alectinib in non-small-cell lung cancer: a report of two cases and a literature review
.
Intern Med
.
2022
:
7472
21
.
Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.